C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Calculated and Observed Thicknesses of 1 and 2 on
Si 111
lable by varying the SDS/SWNT reaction time with the terminal
diazonium salt from 3 to 16 h.
Thickness (nm)
Control experiments were performed to ensure both the OPE
and diazotization steps were required for SWNT attachment
(Supporting Information). When the OPE was not employed or
when the second diazotization step was eliminated, there was no
attachment of the SWNTs to the silicon surface. This leads us to
conclude that the SWNTs are indeed covalently attached13 to the
assembled organic molecule via the in situ generated diazonium
salt.
It is important to note that when using NOBF4 to perform the
diazotization (as opposed to the alkylnitrite) on the assembled
monolayer, surface roughening in the form of large peaks and
valleys (10-20 nm) was observed and there were no surface-bound
nanotubes.
The lightly functionalized surface-bound SWNTs are likely to
retain significant degrees of their electronic and optical properties
since it takes functionalization of ca. 1 in 100 carbons along a
SWNT to even cause a loss of the sensitive UV van Hove
singularities.15 Furthermore, when applied only to the end-segments
of SWNTs that straddle patterned gap arrays, the active central
portions of the SWNTs will remain unperturbed by the surface
hybridization moieties. Thus, this Si-nanotube assembly strategy
could provide the basis for directing SWNTs to precise junctions
in electronic, optical, and sensor arrays.
Molecule
founda
calcdb
1
2
2.0c
1.4,c 2.1d
1.9
1.9
a Value measured by ellipsometry with ca. (0.2 nm error. All reported
values are an average of three measurements for reactions of a 2.0 mM
solution of diazonium salt in CH3CN. b The theoretical thickness calculated
by molecular mechanics (not including the arene-silicon bond). c Assembly
performed inside a nitrogen-filled glovebox for 1 and 16d h.
averaged slightly below the theoretical SAM thickness, although
thicknesses close to the theoretical value were attained by reacting
the substrate with a solution of 2 for longer time periods.
Figure 2 shows the XPS spectrum of the N1s region of a
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by DARPA, ONR,
NASA, and the AFOSR. Trimethylsilylacetylene was provided by
Dr. I. Chester of FAR Laboratories and Dr. R. Awartani of Petra
Research Inc. The NSF, CHEM 0075728, provided partial funding
for the 400 MHz NMR.
Figure 2. XPS spectrum of the N1s region of a SAM of compound 1 (45°
take-off angle).
monolayer of 1. The smaller peak at 405.8 eV is due to the nitrogen
atom of the nitro group, and the peak at 399.7 eV is due to the
aniline plus nitrogen gas adsorbed from the atmosphere. Attempts
to measure the nitrogen signal of the surface-tethered diazonium
salt were unsuccessful due to its rapid decomposition during transfer
in air.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic details and complete
structure preparation and assemblies. This material is available free of
References
SWNT attachment was further verified using atomic force
microscopy (AFM) (Figure 3). The AFM image shows a high
(1) Stewart, M. P.; Maya, F.; Kosynkin, D. V.; Dirk, S. M.; Stapleton, J. J.;
McGuiness, C. L.; Allara, D. L.; Tour, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 370-378.
(2) Dyke, C. A.; Tour, J. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 108, 11151-11159.
(3) Dyke, C. A.; Tour, J. M. Chem.sEur. J. 2004, 10, 812-817.
(4) Kosynkin, D. V.; Tour, J. M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 993-995.
(5) Kosynkin, D. V.; Yang, J.; Tour, J. M. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.
660, 2001, JJ3.5.1-JJ3.5.5.
(6) Flatt, A. K.; Yao, Y.; Maya, F.; Tour, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
1752-1755.
(7) Pollack, S. K.; Naciri, J.; Mastrangelo, J.; Patterson, C. H.; Torres, J.;
Moore, M.; Shashidhar, R.; Kushmerick, J. G. Langmuir 2004, 20, 1838-
1842.
(8) Hickman, J. J.; Laibinis, P. E.; Auerbach, D. I.; Zou, C. F.; Gardner, T.
J.; Whitesides, G. M.; Wrighton, M. S. Langmuir 1992, 8, 357-359.
(9) Gardner, T. J.; Frisbie, C. D.; Wrighton, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 6927-6933.
(10) Walker, B. R.; Wassel, R. A.; Stefanescu, D. M.; Gorman, C. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16330-16331.
(11) Tour, J. M. Molecular Electronics: Commercial Insights, Chemistry,
DeVices, Architecture and Programming; World Scientific: River Edge,
NJ, 2003.
Figure 3. Tapping mode AFM image of SWNTs covalently bound via 1
(not seen) on a silicon surface.
coverage of SWNTs bound to the silicon substrate via the OPE
molecules. The architectures are highly robust and able to withstand
rinsing and 1 min of sonication. Many surface-bound nanotubes
exist as individuals, although there may be small bundles present,
as well. While the nanotube diameters range from 0.95-3.1 nm,
as recorded by the height measurements, they can be difficult to
precisely ascertain due to their projection upward from the
molecule-grafted surface. We found SWNT coverage to be control-
(12) O’Connell, M. J.; Bachilo, S. M.; Huffman, C. B.; Moore, V. C.; Strano,
M. S.; Haroz, E. H.; Rialon, K. L.; Boul, P. J.; Noon, W. H.; Kittrell, C.;
Ma, J.; Hauge, R. H.; Weisman, R. B.; Smalley, R. E. Science 2002, 297,
593-596.
(13) Dyke, C. A.; Tour, J. M. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1215-1218.
(14) Kimball, D. B.; Haley, M. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3338-
3351.
(15) Dyke, C. A.; Stewart, M. P.; Tour, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
4497-4509.
JA051269R
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 25, 2005 8919