J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3479-3486
3479
Ch ir a l F lu or o Keton es for Ca ta lytic Asym m etr ic Ep oxid a tion of
Alk en es w ith Oxon e
Scott E. Denmark* and Hayao Matsuhashi
Roger Adams Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
denmark@scs.uiuc.edu
Received J anuary 23, 2002
Two structurally dissimilar, chiral fluoro ketones have been prepared and their potential as
enantioselective catalysts for asymmetric epoxidation with Oxone has been evaluated. The tropinone-
based ketone (-)-5 was easily prepared and showed excellent reactivity but only modest
enantioselectivity. The biphenyl-based ketone (-)-6 was prepared in a somewhat lengthy synthesis
(along with its monofluoro and geminal fluoro analogues). This ketone exhibited only modest
reactivity; 30 mol % of (-)-6 was needed to bring about complete conversion in a reasonable time.
The enantioselectivity of this catalyst was generally much higher, but again very substrate
dependent.
In tr od u ction a n d Ba ck gr ou n d
classes of alkenes still remained a challenging problem.
Moreover, the interest in non-metal-based “organocataly-
sis” has achieved a heightened level of importance in
recent years.3 In this context, chiral dioxirane-mediated
epoxidation represents an attractive alternative method.4
The chemistry of dimethyldioxirane 1 has recently re-
ceived much attention in both mechanistic and synthetic
applications. Dioxiranes can be generated from ketones
and Oxone (peroxymonosulfate) in situ, or in some
instances they can be isolated5 (Scheme 1). Because
dioxiranes are powerful oxidants, they are quite useful
in organic synthesis.5
The asymmetric epoxidation mediated by a chiral
dioxirane is conceptually simple as shown in Scheme 2.
A chiral ketone can be transformed to the corresponding
dioxirane by the action of persulfate, and the chiral
dioxirane may react selectively on one enantiotopic face
of the substrate alkene. After oxygen atom transfer from
dioxirane to alkene, the chiral ketone is regenerated, thus
rendering the reaction system catalytic.
In 1984, Curci et al. reported first example of a chiral
dioxirane mediated epoxidation. These workers employed
the readily available ketone 2 (Chart 1) as the chiral
ketone and observed a 12% ee for the reaction with
1-methyl-1-cyclohexene.6 Significant progress has been
made in the design and application of chiral ketones for
asymmetric epoxidation in the intervening 17 years. The
first critical advance was reported by Yang et al., who
described a highly enantioselective epoxidation protocol
using C2-symmetric ketone 3.7 Subsequent reports de-
The epoxidation of alkenes is the most fundamental
oxygen functionalization of carbon-carbon double bonds.
The importance of this transformation is a direct conse-
quence of the utility of the product epoxides as synthetic
intermediates. Accordingly, the ability to carry out enan-
tioselective oxygen atom transfer to alkenes has served
as the vanguard for advances in asymmetric catalysis
over the past two decades. The first practical asymmetric
epoxidation reported by Sharpless et al. for allylic alco-
hols was a watershed event in the exploration for more
selective and general methods of epoxidation.1 In this
reaction, the allylic hydroxyl group plays a fundamental
role, in coordination of the substrate to the chiral
titanium complex. As a result, a favorable asymmetric
environment can be crafted between reactant and sub-
strate by virtue of the strong coordination of the alcohol
to the titanium metal center.
The next important advance in enantioselective oxygen
atom transfer was the asymmetric epoxidation of un-
functionalized alkenes. In this case, the enantioselectivity
must be controlled by nonbonding, which are much
weaker and less directional than coordination bonds
between reactant and substrate. The J acobsen epoxida-
tion system employing the now-familiar manganese-
salen complexes is the archetypal example of this reaction
and one that has been extensively developed and applied
over the past 10 years.2
Despite the enormous success with Mn-salen complex
mediated asymmetric epoxidation, the reaction of certain
(1) (a) Katsuki, T.; Sharpless, K. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
5974. (b) Katsuki, T.; Martin, V. S. Org. React. 1996, 48, 1. (c) J ohnson,
R. A.; Sharpless, K. B. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 7;
Oxidation; Ley, S. V., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Chapter
3.2. (d) Katsuki, T. In Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis, Vol. II;
J acobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer-Verlag:
Heidelberg, 1999; Chapter 18.1.
(2) (a) Zhang, W.; Loebach, J . L.; Wilson, S. R.; J acobsen, E. N. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2801. (b) Zhang, W.; J acobsen, E. N. J .
Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2296. (c) J acobsen, E. N.; Wu, M. F. In
Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis; J acobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A.,
Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, 1999; Vol. II,
Chapter 18.2. See also: (d) Hosoya, N.; Hatayama, A.; Irie, R.; Sasaki,
H.; Katsuki, T. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 4311.
(3) For a recent review, see: Dalko, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 3726.
(4) (a) Adam, W.; Curci, R.; Edwards, J . O. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989,
22, 205. (b) Curci, R.; Dinoi, A.; Rubino, M. F. Pure Appl. Chem. 1995,
67, 811. (c) Murray, R. W. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1187.
(5) (a) Murray, R. W.; Singh, M. Org. Synth. 1996, 74, 91. (b)
Murray, R. W.; J eyaraman, R. J . Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 2847.
(6) (a) Curci, R.; Fiorentino, M.; Serio, M. R. J . Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1984, 155. (b) Curci, R.; D’Accolti, L.; Fiorentino, M.; Rosa,
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5831.
(7) (a) Yang, D.; Yip, Y.-C.; Tang, M.-W.; Wong, M.-K.; Zheng, J .-
H.; Cheung, K.-K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 491. (b) Yang, D.;
Wang, X.-C.; Wong, M.-K.; Yip, Y.-C.; Tang, M.-W. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 11311.
10.1021/jo020050h CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/17/2002