C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
The marked preference for the O3′ isomer suggests that the
ribosome uses the O3′-linked tRNA as the P-site substrate. Because
this is the same regioisomer used in the A-site, it indicates that the
aminoacyl tRNA ester is not required to undergo regioisomerization
during its course through the PTC.
Preferential binding and inhibition by the O3′-linked isomer
clarifies an important ambiguity in the previous biochemical data
regarding the inactivity of 2′- or 3′-dA76 P-site substrates.2,6-9 The
current data argue that substrates lacking a 3′-OH are inactive as
donors because they are constrained into the wrong O2′-linked
regioisomer. In contrast, P-site substrates lacking the 2′-OH adopt
the correct O3′-linked regioisomer, but are inactive as P-site donors
because the 2′-OH plays a critical role in substrate assisted catalysis
of the peptidyl transferase reaction.9 The current data exclude a
mechanistic model in which the A76 2′-OH participates as a
covalent intermediate in the reaction.
In conclusion, we have established the regiospecificity of the
ribosomal peptidyl transferase reaction. We are now in the process
of utilizing these inhibitors to understand the role of the critical
A76 2′-OH and to probe the stereospecificity and potential metal
ion dependence of peptide bond formation.
Figure 2. Regiospecificity of analogue binding by chemical footprinting
and peptidyl transferase inhibition assays. (a) CMCT footprinting of U2585
in the PTC at 37 °C. Shown is an autoradiograph of primer extension
reaction from CMCT modification of U2585 in the presence of the O3′ or
the O2′ analogue. Concentrations and presence of CMCT are indicated above
each lane. Bands for U2585 and U2477, which is used to normalize the
footprinting data, are marked with an arrow. (b) Plot of footprinting data
used to estimate the relative dissociation constants (Kd).
Acknowledgment. We thank Olke Uhlenbeck and Jesse Co-
chrane for helpful discussions, and David E. Kitchen (Dharmacon
Research Inc.) and Olga Fedorova for technical assistance in solid
phase synthesis. This work was supported by a an American Cancer
Society Beginning Investigator award to S.A.S. and a National
Institutes of Health Postdoctoral Fellowship to K.S.H.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic, CMCT modifica-
tion, and kinetic procedures are included. This material is available
Figure 3. Inhibition of the modified fragment reaction. (a) Sample reaction
time courses performed at pH 7.0 with 100 nM E. coli 50S ribosomes and
400 nM CCApcb. The reactions shown had 200 µM CPuromycin and no
inhibitor (O), 300 nM O3′ inhibitor (0), or 300 nM O2′ inhibitor ()).
Background hydrolysis in the absence of CPuromycin is also shown (×).
(B) Ki values for the inhibitors were determined by varying the CPuromycin
concentration from 20 to 400 µM.
References
(1) Taiji, M.; Yokoyama, S.; Miyazawa, T. Biochemistry 1983, 22, 3220-
3225.
(2) Chladek, S.; Sprinzl, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 371-
391.
(3) Chinali, G.; Sprinzl, M.; Parmeggiani, A.; Cramer, F. Biochemistry 1974,
13, 3001-3010.
(4) Ringer, D.; Chladek, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1975, 72, 2950-
in the same range as CCA binding alone12 and suggests that the
O2′ regioisomer is unable to bridge between the A site and P site
of the PTC due to significant steric hindrance in the active site. A
similar preference for the O3′ inhibitor was observed in enzyme
inhibition studies,12,16 where the O3′, but not the O2′ inhibitor,
significantly reduced the reaction rate (Figure 3). The inhibition
constant (Ki) of the O3′ inhibitor was 45 ( 5 nM, while the O2′-
linked inhibitor was greater than 7 µM, which is above the
measurable limit of the assay.
The interactions between the O3′ regioisomer and the PTC are
likely to provide a reasonable estimate of the reaction intermediate.
A crystal structure of the inhibitor in complex with the 50S
ribosomal subunit reveals that the CCA portion of both the A-site
and P-site segments makes the predicted base pairing interactions
in the A loop and P loop, respectively.14 The structure also shows
that the ribosome adopts the active induced conformation upon
inhibitor binding.
2954.
(5) Taiji, M.; Yokoyama, S.; Miyazawa, T. Biochemistry 1985, 24, 5776-
5780.
(6) Wagner, T.; Cramer, F.; Sprinzl, M. Biochemistry 1982, 21, 1521-1529.
(7) Dorner, S.; Panuschka, C.; Schmid, W.; Barta, A. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003,
31, 6536-6542.
(8) Hecht, S. M.; Kozarich, J. W.; Schmidt, F. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1974, 71, 4317-4321.
(9) Weinger, J. S.; Parnell, K. M.; Dorner, S.; Green, R.; Strobel, S. A. Nat.
Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 1101-1106.
(10) Hansen, J. L.; Schmeing, T. M.; Moore, P. B.; Steitz, T. A. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 11670-11675.
(11) Nissen, P.; Hansen, J.; Ban, N.; Moore, P. B.; Steitz, T. A. Science 2000,
289, 920-930.
(12) Welch, M.; Chastang, J.; Yarus, M. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 385-390.
(13) Weinger, J. S.; Kitchen, D.; Scaringe, S. A.; Strobel, S. A.; Muth, G. W.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1502-1511.
(14) Schmeing, T. M.; Huang, K. S.; Strobel, S. A.; Steitz, T. A. Nature 2005,
438, 520-524.
(15) Moazed, D.; Noller, H. F. Cell 1989, 57, 585-597.
(16) Parnell, M. K.; Seila, A. C.; Strobel, S. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2002, 99, 11658-11663.
JA0554099
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 10, 2006 3109