C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
The fact that cationic hydride 4‚THF can be obtained prepara-
tively offers an unprecedented opportunity to examine the reactivity
of such a species in detail. Studies aimed at mapping out this
reactivity, including the σ-bond metathesis chemistry mentioned
above, are ongoing. Although the long Ti-H distance suggests that
homolytic cleavage of this bond may be facile, the tendency to
undergo reduction via loss of H2 is diminished in the Cp* system
as opposed to the Cp stabilized cations, partially accounting for
the higher olefin polymerization activities observed in the former
catalyst.
Acknowledgment. Funding for this work was provided by Nova
Chemicals, Inc. of Calgary, Alberta, and NSERC of Canada through
a CRD grant to W.E.P.
Figure 2. Crystalmaker depiction of the molecular structure of the cationic
portion of 4‚THF. Selected bond distances (Å): Ti(1)-H(1), 1.84(2); Ti(1)-
N(1), 1.781(2); Ti(1)-O(1), 2.075(2); P(1)-N(1), 1.613(2). Selected bond
angles (deg): N(1)-Ti(1)-O(1), 104.33(8); N(1)-Ti(1)-H(1), 98.6(7);
O(1)-Ti(1)-H(1), 94.4(7); N(1)-Ti(1)-Cp*cent, 131.66(6); O(1)-Ti(1)-
Cp*cent, 115.78(5); Ti(1)-N(1)-P(1), 168.39(12).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, tables
of crystal data, atomic coordinates, bond lengths and angles, ORTEP
diagrams, and anisotropic displacement parameters for 2, 4‚THF, and
5‚THF (PDF and CIF). This material is available free of charge via
be carried out in toluene in the absence of haloarene solvents for
hydride 4 to be generated cleanly. Toluene solutions of 4 in the
presence of H2 are spectroscopically well behaved, and a broad
signal at 7.80 ppm is tentatively assigned to the Ti-H moiety,
although this is likely an averaged position due to exchange with
References
(1) Hoskin, A. J.; Stephan, D. W. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2002, 233-234, 107.
(2) Harrod, J. F. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2000, 206-207, 493.
(3) (a) de Wolf, J. M.; Meetsma, A.; Teuben, J. H. Organometallics 1995,
14, 5466. (b) Lukens, W. W., Jr.; Matsunaga, P. T.; Andersen, R. A.
Organometallics 1998, 17, 5240. (c) Pattiansina, J. W.; van Bolhuis, F.;
Teuben, J. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 330.
(4) Recent examples with bridging hydrides: (a) Love, J. B.; Clark, H. C.
S.; Cloke, F. G. N.; Green, J. C.; Hitchcock, P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 6843. (b) Mokuolu, Q. F.; Dumanton, P. A.; Blake, A. J.;
Wilson, C.; Love, J. B. Organometallics 2003, 22, 4387. (c) Matsuo, T.;
Kawaguchi, H. Organometallics 2003, 22, 5379.
(5) (a) Kaplan, A. W.; Polse, J. L.; Ball, G. E.; Andersen, R. A.; Bergman,
R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11649. (b) Sweeney, Z. K.; Polse, J.
L.; Andersen, R. A.; Bergman, R. G.; Kubinec, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 4543. (c) Bennett, J. L.; Wolczanski, P. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 2179. (d) No¨th, H.; Schemidt, M. Organometallics 1995, 14,
4601.
2
dissolved H2. A corresponding resonance appears in the H NMR
spectrum for d1-4. While 4 is stable for a couple of hours at room
temperature, eventually the yellow solutions decolorized and
decomposition of the sample was spectroscopically evident after
16 h. Attempts to isolate 4 were unsuccessful because removal of
H2 led to accelerated decomposition.
When dissolved in bromobenzene, base free 4 undergoes
conversion to the cationic bromide 5, with loss of benzene, via
formal σ bond metathesis.16 Compound 5 was characterized
spectroscopically in solution and also crystallographically as its THF
adduct 5‚THF.11 When this reaction was done with d1-4, C6H5D
was detected spectroscopically and via mass spectrometry, further
implicating the hydride moiety in 4. Furthermore, addition of a
slight excess of THF to toluene solutions of 4 gave a diamagnetic
mono-THF adduct, 4‚THF, which could be isolated as a crystalline
solid in 87% yield upon precipitation with hexanes. A signal at
(6) Spectroscopic evidence for an unstable example supported by the Cp-
amido “constrained geometry” ligand has been presented: Chen, Y.-X.;
Marks, T. J. Organometallics 1997, 16, 3639.
(7) Resconi, L.; Cavallo, L.; Fait, A.; Piemontesi, F. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100,
1253.
(8) Deckers, P. J. W.; Hessen, B.; Teuben, J. H. Organometallics 2002, 21,
5122.
(9) (a) No¨th, H.; Schmidt, M. Organometallics 1995, 14, 4601. (b) Fischer,
J. M.; Piers, W. E.; Pearce-Batchilder, S. D.; Zaworotko, M. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 283.
(10) Stephan, D. W.; Stewart, J. C.; Gue´rin, F.; Courtenay, S.; Kickham, J.;
Hollink E.; Beddie, C.; Hoskin, A.; Graham, T.; Wei, P.; Spence, R. E.
v. H.; Xu, W.; Koch, L.; Gao, X.; Harrison, D. G. Organometallics 2003,
22, 1937.
(11) See Supporting Information for full details.
(12) Stephan, D. W.; Stewart, J. C.; Gue´rin, F.; Spence, R. E. v. H.; Xu, W.;
Harrison, D. G. Organometallics 1999, 18, 1116.
1
7.25 ppm in the H NMR spectrum integrating to one proton was
2
assigned to the Ti-H moiety and confirmed by H NMR spec-
troscopy on d1-4‚THF.17 The nature of 4‚THF was also established
via an X-ray crystallographic analysis (Figure 2).
The hydride ligand in 4‚THF was located and refined, giving a
Ti-H distance of 1.84(2) Å, somewhat longer than the distances
found in other monomeric titanium hydrides (1.64-1.77 Å3-5). The
Ti center is of distorted tetrahedral geometry, and no contacts with
the [B(C6F5)4]- counteranion under 3.2 Å are evident. The Ti-
N(1) distance of 1.781(2) Å is consistent with a cationic Ti(IV)
center (cf. the distance of 1.780(2) Å in 5‚THF) rather than cationic
Ti(III) (cf. the distances of ∼1.98 Å in 2).
(13) Yang, X.; Stern, C. L.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10015.
(14) Cummins, C. C.; Schaller, C. P.; Van Duyne, G. D.; Wolczanski, P. T.;
Chan, A. W. E.; Hoffmann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2985.
(15) Due to disorder, this structure only establishes connectivity in 3.
(16) For a recent example of a similar σ bond metathesis reaction, see:
Gavenonis, J.; Tilley, T. D. Organometallics 2004, 23, 31.
(17) IR spectroscopy was ineffective because the phosphinimide ligand exhibits
several strong bands around 1500-1600 cm-1, the region expected for
Ti-H stretches (see ref 5).
JA048952I
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 18, 2004 5669