C2–C3 bond in 1 and incorporation of two O-atoms into 3 and
concomitant CO release. Similar reactions of metallic copper with
acidic compounds leading to copper complexes in the presence of
O2 are well documented (e.g. copper bracelet).10 The oxygenation
of 3 resembles the enzyme reaction of 1 to give the cleavage
product as shown in Scheme 1.
Financial support by the Hungarian National Research Fund
(OTKA Nos. T030400 and T043414) is gratefully acknowledged.
Thanks to Drs A. Rockenbauer and L. Korecz (Budapest) for EPR
measurements.
Notes and references
†
Intensity data were measured on an Enraf-Nonius CAD4 diffractometer
at 293 K. The structures were solved by direct methods. The structures were
refined by full-matrix anisotropic least-squares on F2. The N–H hydrogen
atoms were located in difference maps (3,5), other hydrogen atoms were
added at idealized positions. All hydrogen atoms were included in structure
factor calculations but were not refined.
Crystal data. Compound 3: C36H34CuN4O6, Mw = 682.21, triclinic,
¯
space group P1, a = 9.340(2), b = 9.626(3), c = 10.522(1) Å, a =
101.86(1), b = 125.64(1), g = 107.73(2)°, V = 805.3(3) Å3, Z = 1, Dc
=
1.407 g cm23, m(Cu–Ka) = 1.396 cm21, 2904 reflections measured, 212
parameters refined on F2 using 2697 unique reflections to final indices
R[F2 > 3sF2)] = 0.043, wR = 0.115, w = 1/[s (Fo2) + (0.0787P)2
+
2
0.0874P], P
negative peaks were 0.505 and 20.767 e Å23
Compound 4: C54H46Cu1.5N2O3P2, Mw = 928.18, monoclinic, space
=
(Fo2+2Fc2)/3. The final residual Fourier positive and
.
group C2/c, a
= 40.058(4), b = 10.251(2), c = 27.769(4) Å, b =
125.64(1)°, V = 9267(2) Å3, Z = 8, Dc = 1.331 g cm23, m(Mo–Ka) =
0.809 cm21, 13945 reflections measured, 586 parameters refined on F2
using 13366 unique reflections to final indices R[F > 3sF)] = 0.038, wR =
0.083, w = 1/[s (Fo2) + (0.0526P)2], P = (Fo2+2Fc2)/3. The final residual
2
Fourier positive and negative peaks were 0.349 and 20.345 e Å23
.
Compound 5: C41H50CuN6O7, Mw = 802.41, monoclinic, space group
Pc, a = 10.033(3), b = 12.778(11), c = 17.681(15) Å, b = 117.36(6)°, V
= 2013(3) Å3, Z = 2, Dc = 1.21 g cm23, m(Cu–Ka) = 1.227 cm21, 5677
reflections measured, 504 parameters refined using 5190 unique reflections
2
2
to final indices R[F > 3sF)]
= 0.030, wR = 0.077, w = 1/[s (Fo )
Scheme 2
+(0.0536P) + 0.2737P], P = (Fo2+2Fc2)/3. The final residual Fourier
positive and negative peaks were 0.256 and 20.206 e Å23. CCDC
crystallographic data in .cif or other electronic format.
products MS data evidenced both labelled O-atoms in the
products,9 however some scrambling during the workup occurred.
Preliminary kinetic data show first order dependence of the reaction
rate on both 3 and O2. It is paramagnetic with mB = 1.91 and EPR
parameters of g = 2.129 and A = 55.9 G, and the geometry around
the Cu(II) centre is square pyramidal. The two N-atoms of tmeda
and the two O-atoms of the deprotonated 1 occupy basal
positions.
1 I. Bauer, N. Max, S. Fetzner and F. Lingens, Eur. J. Biochem., 1996,
240, 576.
2 T. Oka, F. J. Simpson and H. G. Krishnamurthy, Can. J. Microbiol.,
1977, 16, 493.
3 S. Fetzner, B. Tshisuaka, F. Lingens, R. Kappl and J. Hüttermann,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 576.
The results outlined show that copper metal probably deliberates
H2 from 1 to give 3 which in the presence of triphenylphosphine
reacts further with scission of the N–H bond to give the trinuclear
4 É. Balogh-Hergovich, J. Kaizer, J. Pap, G. Speier, G. Huttner and L.
Zsolnai, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2002, 2287 and references therein.
5 I. Lippai, G. Speier, G. Huttner and L. Zsolnai, Chem. Commun., 1997,
741.
6 É. Balogh-Hergovich, G. Speier and G. Argay, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1991, 551.
7 G. A. Ardizzoia, S. Brenna, G. LaMonica, A. Maspero, N. Maciocchi
and M. Moret, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 610 and references therein.
8 M. Czaun, I. Ganszky, G. Speier and L. Párkányi, Z. Kristallogr. NCS,
2002, 257, 379 and unpublished results.
9 M. Czaun and G. Speier, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 5961.
10 S. J. Beveridge and W. R. Walker, Aust. J. Chem., 1981, 33, 2331.
copper( )(II) compex 4. The driving force for these reactions are the
I
formation of the very stable chelate complexes 3 and 4. The
formation of the highly delocalized tridentate ligand in 4 may ease
the scission reaction of the N–H bond. 4 can not be considered as
a clear Cu( ) amido complex since the CNN bond length is longer
I
than that in the parent compound and the heterocycle is deloc-
alized.8 In the presence of tmeda and dioxygen 3 may be formed
first, which is oxygenated subsequently to 5 with cleavage of the
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 0 0 4 – 1 0 0 5
1005