Organic Letters
Letter
a b
,
First, our optimization studies commenced reacting 1-(1-
benzyl-1H-indol-3-yl)ethan-1-one 1a with but-3-en-2-ol 2a as
the test substrates (see Table S1 for details). To our delight,
the reaction occurred to give C4-alkenylated 3a in 17% yield
along with a trace of alkylated 4a when the substrates were
stirred with 2.5 mol % of [Cp*RhCl2]2, 20 mol % of AgSbF6,
and 2 equiv of Cu(OAc)2 in (CH2Cl)2 at 100 °C. Screening of
the ethereal solvents, such as THF and 1,4-dioxane, revealed
that the formation of 3a was facilitated. Addition of Ag2CO3 in
place of Cu(OAc)2 led to improve the yield of 3a to 74%,
whereas AgOAc produced inferior result. Thus, Ag2CO3 was
found to be the optimal additive11 to furnish the alkenylation
product selectively. Further screening of the alcoholic solvents
Scheme 2. Scope of C4 Alkenylation with Indoles
t
such as, HFIP, TFE, and BuOH favored the formation of 4a
compared to 3a. Switching the additive from Ag2CO3 to
NaOPiv·H2O and a combination with AgOTf selectively
produced the alkylated 4a as the sole product. PivOH was
also found to be effective, delivering 4a in 61% yield, whereas
AcOH was ineffective. Thus, NaOPiv·H2O was beneficial to
achieve alkylation selectively. Control experiments confirmed
that the combination of AgSbF6 or AgOTf and Rh(III) catalyst
is decisive and no product formation was observed in its
absence. Notably, C4 functionalization of indole was occurred
selectively and no C2-functionalized product was detected.
From the density functional theory (DFT) calculation, it was
proposed that introducing a carbonyl group at the C3 C−H
site can significantly increase the electron density at C4 site
compared to the C2 site.5i This may drive the selective C4
functionalization by an electrophilic metalation-type process.
With the optimal reaction conditions established, the scope
of C4 alkenylation was assessed for substituted indoles 1b−s
with allyl alcohol 2a as a standard substrate (Scheme 2). The
reaction of 2-methylindole 1b afforded 3b in 70% yield. 5-
Substituted indoles bearing bromo (1c) and methyl (1d)
functionalities were unsuccessful, which was presumably due to
the steric congestion near the C4 site. However, the substrates
containing substitution at the 6 position of indole, with fluoro
(1e), bromo (1f), p-tolyl (1g), and 1-pyrenyl (1h) groups
afforded the target alkenylated products 3e−h in 61−79%
yields. Delightfully, sensitive 6-allylated indole 1i afforded 3i in
69% yield. Similar results were obtained with 7-chloro (1j) and
7-methyl (1k) substituted indoles furnishing 3j and 3k in 71
and 74% yields, respectively. Fused indole congeners 1l and
1m produced 3l and 3m in 66 and 64% yields, respectively.
Interestingly, NH-free indole was successfully coupled to give
3n in 67% yield. Variation in N-protecting groups such as Boc
(1o), ethyl (1p), and octyl (1q), the former was ineffective,
while as others was amenable, delivering 3p and 3q in 69 and
74% yields, respectively. Likewise, 3-hexanoyl derivative 1r and
isobutyryl derivative 1s conveyed 3r and 3s in 73 and 78%
yields, respectively. These results suggest that C4 alkenylation
of indoles can be accomplished with functional group
tolerance.
a
Reaction conditions: 1b−s (0.1 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol),
[Cp*RhCl2]2 (2.5 mol %), AgSbF6 (20 mol %), Ag2CO3 (0.2
b
mmol), 1,4-dioxane (1.5 mL), 100 °C, 6 h, air. Isolated yields.
occurring terpene alcohol isophytol 2i participated in the
reaction to give the C4 allylated product 3aa in 41% yield. The
reaction of tertiary allyl alcohol precludes the β-hydride
elimination pathway, and the reaction proceeds via β-hydroxy
elimination pathway to deliver allylated product.8d This result
confides that C4-selective allylation of indoles can be achieved
employing tert-allyl alcohols as a coupling partner.
Next, the C4 alkylation scope was investigated utilizing
diversely substituted indoles with allyl alcohol 2a as a standard
coupling partner (Scheme 4). The reaction of 2-methylindole
1b furnished the C4 alkylated product 4b in 53% yield.
Likewise, 5-methoxy (1t), 7-methyl (1k), N-phenyl (1u), and
3-isovaleryl (1v) containing indoles converted to the alkylated
scaffolds 4d−g in 63−69% yields, whereas 5-bromoindole 1c
was an unsuccessful substrate, which may be due to steric
hindrance.
The reaction conditions were extended to the coupling of
substituted allyl alcohols 2j−p with indole 1a as a standard
substrate (Scheme 4). The reaction of pent-1-en-3-ol 2j gave
4h in 69% yield. Similarly, substitution of the phenyl ring at the
carbinol carbon with 4-methoxy (2k) and 4-phenyl (2l) groups
underwent reaction to afford 4i and 4j in 68 and 66% yields,
respectively. Remarkably, conjugated π-system based allyl
alcohols 2m−p efficiently conveyed the alkylation products
4k−n in 63−72% yields. These results displayed the
captivating potential of the method for C4 alkylation of
indoles to synthesize β-arylated ketones.
With these intriguing results, the alkenylation scope was
further explored using substituted allyl alcohols 2b−i with
indole 1a as a standard substrate (Scheme 3). 1-Phenylprop-2-
en-1-ol 2b underwent reaction to afford 3t in 64% yield. The
reaction of 3-trifluoromethyl analogue 2c produced 3u in 58%
yield, whereas 4-chloro (2d) and 4-fluoro (2e) derivatives
delivered the corresponding alkenylated product 3v and 3w in
63 and 51% yields, respectively. Similar results were perceived
with alkyl substitutions at the carbinol carbon of the allyl
alcohols 2f−h, delivering 3x−z in 53−68% yields. Naturally
To divulge the importance of carbonyl based coordinating
groups, the reaction of 2a was conducted with a series of C3-
carbonyl attached indole derivatives. Pivaloyl indole 1A
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX