M. Ramanan et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 124 (2016) 428e434
429
Licofelone has been observed to act against multiple targets such as
COX-2, mPGES1, 5-LOX and FLAP [9]. Aminothiazole [10], embelin
[11], -naphthylpirinixic acid scaffold [12] and lonazolac de-
a
rivatives and indomethacin derivatives [13], have been shown to
suppress the activity of both 5-LOX and mPGES1 effectively. Despite
all these reported compounds, none of them could be developed as
a drug due to their pharmacokinetic parameters. Hence, identifying
a potential inhibitor that could act against multiple targets is still
the need of the hour.
Isocoumarins are isomers of coumarins (1,2-benzopyrone)
[14,15]. They are present widely throughout the plant kingdom,
including bergenin (Bergenia ciliate, Shorea leprosula) [15], thun-
berginol (Hydrangea macrophylla) and cajanolactone (Cajanus
cajan) [16,17]. The anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial and anti-
cancer effects of these naturally occurring compounds have
attracted the medicinal chemists to develop several structural de-
rivatives with the aim of increasing their potencies [17].
Isocoumarins are known to act as anti-inflammatory molecules
and they also possess radical scavenging ability [18]. Paepalantine,
an isocoumarin obtained from Paepalanthus bromelioidesis is
demonstrated to have anti-inflammatory activity against colitis
when tested in rat models [19]. Several fluorinated derivatives are
found to exhibit anti-inflammatory activity [20]. Though significant
anti-inflammatory activity of isocoumarins has been documented,
no reports are available that elucidate their mechanism of action
and their ability to act as dual inhibitors.
Isocoumarins have also been reported to exhibit anti-cancer
activity. Cytogenin, an isocoumarin isolated from Streptoverticil-
lium eurocidium exhibits significant anti-cancer activity in mice
models of Ehrlich carcinoma [21]. Synthetically prepared ones
(NM-3) when tested with Cytogenin resulted in synergistic inhi-
bition of angiogenesis in mouse models [22]. Fluorinated and 3,4
dihydroisocoumarins has been found to prevent metastasis in MCF-
7 breast cancer cell line [23].
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 3-aryl isocoumarins.
groups attached to the C3-aryl substitution (hydroxyl in 1c and
methoxy in 7f) seemed to be responsible for the inhibitory activity.
It can be seen from Table 1 that, compound 1c having hydroxyl
groups at R1 and R2 positions exhibits 84.1% inhibition. The pres-
ence of two hydroxyl groups in the ortho position might have
resulted in additional resonance stabilization and o-quinone for-
mation which is responsible for the high activity [26e28]. In
contrast, one hydroxyl group at the R4 position in compound 7c
lowers the activity by half. Compound 1d substituted with one
methoxy and one hydroxyl group at the R1 and R2 positions
respectively shows 78.8% inhibition probably due to the formation
of a methylene dioxy ring by these two groups [29,30]. Inhibition
activity decreased drastically to almost by half (35.6%) when R4 is
substituted with hydroxyl group, as seen in 7d. In compound 7f
(80.3%), incorporation of hydroxyl at R4 decreases activity
marginally (1f ¼ 72.0%). However, presence of one methoxy group
at R5 position in 1h decreases inhibition to half (36.2%).
In this paper, the inhibitory effect of chemically synthesized 3-
aryl isocoumarin derivatives against the enzymes in the leuko-
triene and prostaglandin pathways are investigated including their
mode of action.
2. Chemistry
1d also exhibited appreciable inhibitory activity (78.8% at 50 mM
concentration) because of the presence of OH and OCH3 groups. But
one of the naturally occurring plant isocoumarin synthesized here
in the laboratory, thunberginol (7c), showed moderate 5-LOX in-
All the screened 3-aryl Isocoumarins, 1 and 7, were synthesized
using a new method developed by us earlier [17], which involved
use of a-aryl aminonitriles 2 as acyl anion equivalents. The a-aryl
aminonitriles, 2, on alkylation with bromides, 3 and 4, followed by
hydrolysis afforded the corresponding aryl ketones 5 and 6
respectively. These aryl ketones, on base promoted intramolecular
cyclization, furnished 3-aryl Isocoumarins 1 and 7 respectively
(Scheme 1). The route has been generalized and applied to the
synthesis of thunberginol A (7c) and other 3-aryl isocoumarins
used in the present study.
hibition (only 40.9% at 50
known dual inhibitor Licofelone were tested as positive controls
which exhibited an IC50 of ~1.0 M and 0.5 M respectively [31,32].
mM). Commercial drug, Zileuton and the
m
m
Thus, one can conclude that, for the first set of six compounds
(Table 1) having H in the R4 position, it is important to have OH at R2
position and for the remaining set of eight compounds having OH
in the R4 position, presence of OMe group at R1, R2 and R3 is
necessary but not at R5 position for high 5-LOX inhibitory activity.
3. Result and discussion
3.2. Kinetics of 5-LOX inhibition
3.1. 5-LOX enzyme activity
The mechanism of action of these two most active isocoumarins
(1c and 7f) was determined by measuring the initial rate of product
formation for various concentrations of the substrate (AA) at two
different concentrations of these inhibitors [33]. Lineweaver-Burke
plot (Fig. 1a) indicates that in the presence of 1c, Vmax (0.83 0.06,
0.93 0.11 and 0.64 0.1 nmol/min) and Km values (2.2, 1.38 and
The 5-LOX enzyme activity was determined in a cell free assay
by measuring the conversion of AA to the product, 5(S)-hydro-
peroxy-6-trans-8,11,14-cis-eicosatetraenoic acid (5-HPETE) which
was measured in terms of OD at l236 [24,25]. Most of the com-
pounds (at 50
Compound 1c was found to be the best with an IC50 of 4.6 0.26
followed by 7f with an IC50 of 12.4 0.14 M. Other compounds
such as 1f and 1d in the series exhibited IC50 of 20.9 0.03 M and
22.8 0.07 M respectively. Compounds that had electron donating
mM) exhibited 5-LOX inhibitory activity (Table 1).
mM
1.17
50
m
M) are different for different concentrations of it (0, 10 and
m
m
M) indicating mixed or non con-competitive inhibition. If the
m
inhibitor has same affinity for both the enzyme and enzyme-
substrate complex then it can be regarded as non-competitive
m