Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.5 (2004)
507
yl triphenylphosphonium ylide in THF afforded vinyl diol deriv-
ative which was subjected to selective benzylation of the pri-
mary hydroxy group using organotin chemistry to give vinyl
benzylether 4 (80% from 3). The Swern oxidation of 4 followed
by dihydroxylation of the resulting ketone 5 with osmium tetrox-
ide and NMO gave the diol 6 as a diastereomeric mixture in very
good yield. The Wittig reaction of the mixture 6 with methyl tri-
phenylphosphonium ylide in THF afforded vinyl diol 7, which
was treated with sodium metaperiodate to give aldehyde 8
(75% from 7). Treatment of 8 with vinylmagnesium bromide
gave divinyl derivative 9 (87%) as a diastereomeric mixture
(2:1). It is interesting to note that no stereoselectivity during
Grignard reaction was observed, despite of two available sites
(ꢀ- and ꢁ-oxygen) for chelation,13 indicating two oxygens of
the isopropylidene group do not form ꢀ- and ꢁ-chelates. Diene
9 was subjected to RCM reaction using the second generation
Grubbs catalyst14 in methylene chloride to give cyclopentenol
1015 (84%), which was oxidized to the key intermediate 17,9 us-
ing tetrapropylammonium perruthenate (TPAP) and NMO in
methylene chloride (84%). This key intermediate 1 was convert-
ed to (ꢁ)-neplanocin A according to the known procedure.7 This
intermediate also serves as a versatile synthon for the synthesis
of other carbocyclic nucleosides.
5
a) M. Arita, K. Adachi, Y. Ito, H. Sawai, and M. Ohno, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 105, 4049 (1983). b) J. R. Medich, K. B.
Kunnen, and C. R. Johnson, Tetrahedron Lett., 28, 4131
(1987).
S. M. Ali, K. Ramesh, and R. T. Borchardt, Tetrahedron
Lett., 31, 1509 (1990).
a) V. E. Marquez, M.-I. Lim, C. K. H. Tseng, A. Markovac,
M. A. Priest, M. S. Khan, and B. Kaskar, J. Org. Chem., 53,
5709 (1988). b) M. S. Wolfe, B. L. Anderson, D. R.
Borcherding, and R. T. Borchardt, J. Org. Chem., 55, 4712
(1990).
6
7
8
9
H. J. Bestman, and D. Roth, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,
29, 99 (1990).
K. Lee, C. Cass, and K. A. Jacobson, Org. Lett., 3, 597
(2001).
10 H. R. Moon, W. J. Choi, H. O. Kim, and L. S. Jeong,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 13, 1189 (2002).
11 Y. H. Jin, and C. K. Chu, Tetrahedron Lett., 43, 4141 (2002).
12 a) M. Kiso, and A. Hasegawa, Carbohydr. Res., 52, 95
(1976). b) A. P. Rauter, F. Ramoa-Ribeiro, A. C. Fernandes,
and J. A. Figueiredo, Tetrahedron, 51, 6529 (1995).
13 J. A. Marco, M. Carda, F. Gonzalez, S. Rodriguez, E.
Castillo, and J. Murga, J. Org. Chem., 63, 698 (1998).
14 a) M. Scholl, S. Ding, C. W. Lee, and R. H. Grubbs, Org.
Lett., 1, 953 (1999). b) T. M. Tmka and R. H. Grubbs,
Acc. Chem. Res., 34, 18 (2001).
15 Experimental procedure for the synthesis of compound 10:
To a stirred solution of 9 (13.46 g, 43.83 mmol) in methylene
chloride (200 mL) was added 2nd generation Grubbs catalyst
(115 mg, 0.14 mmol) and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature for 20 h. After an additional addition of
2nd generation Grubbs catalyst (86 mg, 0.10 mmol), the mix-
ture was stirred for an addtional 28 h at room temperature.
After evaporation of the reaction mixture in vacuo, the re-
sulting residue was purified by silica gel column chromatog-
raphy using hexane and ethyl acetate (2.5:1) as the eluent to
give 10 (10.11 g, 84%) as a pale brownish syrup and the re-
covered starting material (1.083 g).
In summary, we have accomplished the improved and prep-
arative synthesis of 1 from D-ribose using ring-closing metathe-
sis as a key reaction in 10 steps and 26% overall yield. Our meth-
od has synthetic advantages such as large scale synthesis
(>10 g), use of cheap starting material, D-ribose and no use of
expensive reagent like TBDPSCl. This synthetic method will
be extensively utilized for the structure-activity relationship
study of various carbocyclic nucleosides including (ꢁ)-neplano-
cin A.
This work was supported by the grant from the Korea Health
R & D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea (02-PJ2-
PG10-21503-0004).
References and Notes
1
1
a) S. Yaginuma, N. Muto, M. Tsujino, Y. Sudate, M.
Hayashi, and M. Otani, J. Antibiot., 34, 359 (1980). b) M.
Hayashi, S. Yaginuma, H. Yoshioka, and K. Nakatsu, J.
Antibiot., 34, 675 (1981).
ꢀ-cyclopentenol: H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) ꢂ 7.33–7.27
(m, 5H, Ph), 5.78 (m, 1H, 5-H), 5.16 (d, 1H, J ¼ 5:6 Hz,
3a-H), 4.71 (m, 1H, 4-H), 4.56 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 4.51 (d, 1
H, J ¼ 6:0 Hz, 6a-H), 4.18–4.10 (m, 2H, 6-H), 1.71 (br s,
1H, OH), 1.36 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.32 (s, 3H, CH3).
2
3
E. De Clercq, Biochem. Pharmacol., 36, 2567 (1987).
a) M. Hasobe, J. G. McKee, and R. T. Borchardt, Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother., 33, 828 (1989). b) M. Cools and E. De
Clercq, Biochem. Pharmacol., 40, 2259 (1990).
M. S. Wolfe, and R. T. Borchardt, J. Med. Chem., 34, 1521
(1991) and references cited therein.
1
ꢁ-cyclopentenol: H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) ꢂ 7.33–7.26
(m, 5H, Ph), 5.78 (s, 1H, 5-H), 4.95 (d, 1H, J ¼ 6:0 Hz, 4-
H), 4.74 (t, 1H, J ¼ 5:6 Hz, 3a-H), 4.55–4.54 (m, 3H, 6a-
H, CH2Ph), 4.14 (s, 1H, BnOCHH), 4.13 (s, 1H, BnOCHH),
2.54 (br s, 1H, OH), 1.40 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.38 (s, 3H, CH3).
4
Published on the web (Advance View) March 30, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.506