C. Agami et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 5311–5313
5313
Scheme 3.
When 0.5 equiv. of base was used, the metal cation of
the base employed during intramolecular Michael addi-
tion had a dramatical effect on the stereoselectivity of
the reaction (entries 1–3). The best selectivity was
obtained with the less reactive base (LiHMDS, entry 1).
It is noteworthy that when an excess of LiHMDS was
used such as in entry 4 the conversion was low (57%).
A large increase in the diastereoselectivity of the 2 h
reaction was observed when a catalytic amount of bases
(10%) was used (entries 5–7). A total diastereoselectiv-
ity was observed with KHMDS when the reaction was
stopped after 1 h (entry 8).
enolate 11 abstracts an acidic hydrogen on alcohol 9.
Protonation takes place from the less crowded endo
diastereoface (anti to R and Ph). Upon exhaustion of
the acidic hydrogen in the medium, (after 1–2 h with
0.1 equiv. of base), epimerization takes place, due to
the abstraction of the hydrogen a to the amidic func-
tion.8 This equilibration is even faster when 0.5 equiv.
of bases are used.
In summary, we have found an easy and efficient route
to chiral non-racemic cis bicyclic lactams 2 in five steps,
starting from (S)-phenylglycinol. Complete diastereo-
control allows easy purification of compounds 2. The
overall yield, when R=alkyl, are >80%. This protocol
has allowed the synthesis of 10 g of bicyclic lactam 2a,
with 83% overall yield and one purification by chro-
matography on silica gel of the 3,4-dihydro-2-pyridone
9.
When KHMDS (0.5 equiv.) was used (entry 3), the
reaction was thermodynamically controlled, since it
appears that when cis stereomer 2a was exposed to 0.5
equiv. of KHMDS, the ratio of the diastereomers 2a
and 3a was approximately equivalent to the ratio
obtained in entry 3 (52/48). Thus, under kinetic control
(1–2 h reaction with 0.1 equiv. of base), cis bicyclic
lactams 2 were obtained with high diastereoselectivity.
References
1. For recent applications, see: (a) Amat, M.; Canto, M.;
Llor, N.; Ponzo, V.; Perez, M.; Bosch, J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 335; (b) Amat, M.; Perez, M.; Llor, N.;
Bosch, J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2787; (c) Amat, M.; Canto,
M.; Llor, N.; Escolano, C.; Molins, E.; Espinosa, E.;
Bosch, J. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5343; (d) Allin, S. M.;
Vaidya, D. G.; James, S. L.; Allard, J. E.; Smith, T. A. D.;
McKee, V.; Martin, W. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
3661; (e) Amat, M.; Perez, M.; Llor, N.; Bosch, J.; Lago,
E.; Molins, E. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 611.
The cyclization was extended to substrates 9b–d, using
0.1 equiv. of NaHMDS as standard conditions. The
same stereoselectivity was observed in favor of the cis
stereomers 2b–d. Changing methyl ester to ethyl ester
did not modify the d.e. (entry 9). On the contrary, a
reaction starting from 9c was not complete, since only
40% conversion was obtained (entry 10). In this case,
the resulting enolate 11 formed by Michael addition
was expected to be less stable than the intermediate
alcoholate 10 (Scheme 3). Starting from substrate 9d,
partial epimerisation was observed after 2 h (entry 11).
When the reaction was quenched after 40 minutes, the
stereoselectivity was total (entry 12).
2. For reviews, see: (a) Groaning, M. D.; Meyers, A. I.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 9843; (b) Meyers, A. I. Brengel, G.
P. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1.
3. Amat, M.; Llor, N.; Huguet, M.; Molins, E.; Espinosa, E.;
Bosch, J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3257.
Absolute configurations of the cis lactams 2 and trans
lactams 3 were deduced from the stereochemistry of
4. Teran, J. L.; Gnecco, D.; Galindo, A.; Juarez, J.; Bernes,
S.; Enriquez, R. G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 357.
5. Agami, C.; Dechoux, L.; Me´nard, C.; Hebbe, S. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 7573.
1
compounds 2a and 3a already established by NOE H
NMR experiments and X-ray analysis. It was observed
that the chemical shift of the proton a to the ester
moiety in the major cis lactam diastereoisomers 2 was
found up field (2.6–2.7 ppm) from that of trans isomers
3 (3.1–3.2 ppm).
6. Agami, C.; Dechoux, L.; Hebbe, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 2521.
7. (a) Hickmott, P. W.; Sheppard, G. J. Chem. Soc. C 1971,
1358; (b) Hickmott, P. W.; Sheppard, G. J. Chem. Soc. C
1971, 2112.
Rationalization of the stereochemical outcome in
intramolecular Michael addition is presented in Scheme
3. Following addition of alcoholate 10, the resulting
8. When the reaction was quenched after 12 h with MeOD,
the a-amidic position was partially deuterated.