3364 Organometallics, Vol. 23, No. 14, 2004
Communications
Sch em e 2
All our attempts to isolate 1 have failed, but using a
stabilizing diphosphine such as Ph2P(CH2)4PPh2 (dppb)
allowed us to isolate the analogous complex Ni(η3-1-Me-
C3H4)(CN)(dppb) (2) (see Scheme 2).5
The molecular structure is shown in Figure 2.6 The
structure can be described as a trigonal pyramid with
a methylallyl unit in the apical position and confirms
the C-CN bond breaking from the initial 2M3BN. The
Ni-CN distance of 1.893(5) Å is analogous to that
observed for other cyanide complexes7 but shorter than
F igu r e 1. 31P{1H} NMR spectra of a Ni(COD)2/2M3BN/
PPh3 mixture in a 1/16/8 ratio at various temperatures.
From the top to the bottom T ) 25, -60, -70, -80, and
-90 °C. The sharp signals present in very small amounts
in the region between 28 and 33 ppm are due to impurities.
i
in Ni(η3-C3H5)(CN)(dippe) (1.994(3) Å, dippe ) Pr2P-
(CH2)2PiPr2) very recently reported.8 It is worth noting
that a square-pyramidal geometry with a CN in an
apical position is observed in this latter compound.8
A catalytic test was also performed by using a Ni-
(COD)2/2M3BN/dppb mixture in a 1/110/1.3 ratio. GC
analysis shows a 96% conversion and the formation of
3PN in 90% yield (2-methyl-2-butenenitrile, 3%; 4-pen-
tenenitrile, 3%). A similar experiment was performed
using 2 as catalyst precursor, in the absence of any
added phosphine. Remarkably, a similar conversion
(97%) was obtained after heating (3 h at 100 °C) a
mixture of 2/2M3BN in a 1/110 ratio, and GC analysis
showed a 3PN selectivity of 83%.
On the basis of our DFT calculations (B3LYP) carried
out using PH3 as a model,9 we propose the mechanism
depicted in Scheme 3 for the isomerization of 2M3BN
into 3PN, involving the following steps: (i) coordination
of 2M3BN via the CdC bond; (ii) C-CN bond breaking
and formation of a σ-allyl species; (iii) isomerization to
the π-allyl species; (iv) σ-allyl formation; (v) C-CN bond
coupling to 3PN coordination. The B3LYP calculated
F igu r e 2. ORTEP drawing of compound 2. Selected bond
lengths (Å): Ni-C(100), 1.893(6); Ni-P(1), 2.2609(16); Ni-
P(2), 2.1937(16); Ni-C(1), 2.064(6); Ni-C(2), 1.970(6); Ni-
C(3), 2.130(6); C(1)-C(2), 1.374(8); C(2)-C(3), 1.359(9);
C(3)-C(4), 1.495(8); C(100)-N(100), 1.173(6). Selected bond
angles (deg): P(1)-Ni-P(2), 102.18(6); P(1)-Ni-C(100),
102.37(16); P(2)-Ni-C(100), 92.16(17).
Sch em e 1
(5) Selected NMR data are as follows. For 1 (from TOCSY, COSY
1H-1H, and HMQC 1H-13C experiments): 1H NMR (400 MHz, C7D8,
273 K) δ 4.63 (m, H2, 1H), 3.42 (qd, J H
H3, 1H), 2.25 (br, H1, 1H), 1.65 (d, J H
) 6.2 Hz, J H
3Me
3H2
) 12.5 Hz,
NMR analysis. The organic products are clearly identi-
fied by 1H NMR, whereas the 31P NMR spectrum shows
at 100 °C a broad signal at 4.3 ppm indicative of an
exchange. To better visualize the nickel species, we
reduced the initial quantities of reactants. A C7D8
mixture of Ni(COD)2/2M3BN/PPh3 in a 1/16/8 ratio was
heated for 30 min at 100 °C and then analyzed by NMR
at various temperatures. The 31P NMR spectrum shows
at room temperature a very broad signal at 2 ppm (see
Figure 1). Decoalescence leads at -90 °C to a sharp
signal at -4.6 ppm, assigned to free PPh3, and to an
AB signal at 32.6 and 23.9 ppm with a J P-P value of
103 Hz corresponding to the allyl cyanide complex
Ni(η3-1-Me-C3H4)(CN)(PPh3)2 (1) on the basis of several
1D and 2D NMR experiments.5
3Me
) 6.2 Hz, Me, 3H), 1.45 (br,
H1′, 1H); 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C7D8, 273 K) δ 108.7 (C2), 86.5 (C3),
51.7 (C1), 19.6 (Me). For 2: 1H NMR (400 MHz, C7D8, 293 K) δ 4.72
(m, H2, 1H), 3.44 (br, H3, 1H), 2.24 (br, H1, 1H), 1.73 (brd, J H
) 6
3Me
Hz, Me, 3H), 1.25 (br, H1′, 1H); 31P NMR (161.97 MHz, C7D8, 293 K) δ
21 (br). extremely broad signals down to 183 K; 13C{1H} NMR (100.6
MHz, thf-d8, 263 K) δ 152.2 (CN), 96.2 (C2), 81.6 (C3), 44.8 (C1), 20.5
(Me). See Scheme 2 for atom labeling.
(6) Crystal data for 2‚C7H8: C40H43NP2Ni, Mr ) 658.40, triclinic,
space group P1h, T ) 160(2) K, a ) 10.095(2) Å, b ) 11.301(2) Å, c )
15.754(3) Å, R ) 80.07(3)°, â ) 86.08(3)°, γ ) 74.07(3)°, V ) 1701.9(6)
Å3, Z ) 2, µ ) 1.285 mm-1, 14 884/5457 reflections collected/unique,
R1 ) 0.0536, wR2 ) 0.1112, GOF ) 0.938.
(7) (a) Garcia, J . J .; J ones, W. D. Organometallics 2000, 19, 5544.
(b) Goertz, W.; Keim, W.; Vogt, D.; Englert, U.; Boele, M. D. K.; van
der Veen, L. A.; Kamer, P. C. J .; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M. J . Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. 1998, 2981.
(8) Brunkan, N. M.; J ones, W. D. J . Organomet. Chem. 2003, 683,
77.
(9) For details of the calculations, see the Supporting Information.
Geometrical data (Å) for C: Ni-CN ) 1.892, Ni-C1 ) 2.044,
Ni-C2 ) 2.045, Ni-C3 ) 2.182, C1-C2 ) 1.428, C2-C3 ) 1.402,
C3-C4 ) 1.507. The anti isomer is found 15.5 kJ mol-1 above the syn
isomer. We have ruled out a heterolytic C-CN cleavage, as this process
leads to a cationic nickel species and CN- would require a very high
energy of 565 kJ mol-1. As suggested by a reviewer, a concerted process
involving C-CN bond cleavage and direct formation of C from A
without the intermediacy of the σ-species B (and D) cannot be excluded.
Further calculations are in progress.