C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Chart 1. Adducts of 4a and Various Nucleophilesa-c
of the corresponding aziridine. The approach is operationally simple,
with no purification required after the initial cyclization and mild
conditions for the formation of the aminoglycoside product. This
methodology complements existing methods, and there is clear
potential for development of iterative reaction protocols, expansion
of substrate scope and extension to solid-phase synthesis.
Acknowledgment. We thank the N.S.F. for infrastructure
support (CHE-9709183) and the UCSD Academic Senate for
financial support.
Supporting Information Available: Complete experimental and
spectroscopic details for all new compounds. This material is available
References
b
a 2-3 equiv of NuH, 0.2 equiv of Sc(OTf)3, THF, 2-3 h. Yields for
(1) (a) Essentials of Glycobiology; Varki, A., Cummings, R., Esko, J., Freeze,
H., Hart, G., Marth, J., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold
Spring Harbor, NY, 1999. For recent reviews: (b) Dwek, R. A.; Butters,
T. D. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 283. (c) Bertozzi, C. R.; Kiessling, L. L.
Science 2001, 291, 2357. (d) Dove, A. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 913.
(e) Kobata, A. Glycoconjugate J. 2001, 17, 443. (f) Koeller, K. M.; Wong,
C.-H. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 835.
aziridine formation and opening. c2 equiv of TMSN3, 1 h, Sc(OTf)3 omitted.
Scheme 3. Expansion of Substrate Scopea
(2) For reviews of aminoglycoside synthesis and associated protecting group
manipulations, see: (a) Banoub, J.; Boullanger, P.; LaFont, D. Chem. ReV.
1992, 92, 1167. (b) Debenham, J.; Rodebaugh, R.; Fraser-Reid, B. Liebigs
Ann. 1997, 791.
(3) (a) Danishefsky, S. J.; Bilodeau, M. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996,
35, 1380. (b) Griffith, D. A.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 5863. (c) Griffith, D. A.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 5811. (d) Du Bois, J.; Tomooka, C. S.; Hong, J.; Carreira, E. M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3179. For earlier work on glycal aziridination,
see: (e) Driguez, H.; Vermes, J.-P.; Lessard, J. Can. J. Chem. 1978, 56,
119-X. (f) Koslowska-Gamsz, E.; Descotes, G. Can. J. Chem. 1982, 60,
558-X. (g) Lafont, D.; Descotes, G. Carbohydr. Res. 1988, 175, 35.
(4) Nucleophilic ring opening of such bicyclic aziridines has clear precedent
in the ring opening of the analogous epoxides. See: Halcomb, R. L.;
Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6661.
(5) (a) Di Bussolo, V.; Liu, J.; Huffman, L. G., Jr.; Gin, D. Y. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 204. (b) Liu, J.; Gin, D. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 9789. (c) Liu, J. Di Bussolo, V.; Gin, D. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
44, 4015.
(6) For halo- and azidonitration of glycals, see: (a) Lemieux, R. U.;
Nagabushan, T. L. Can. J. Chem. 1968, 46, 401. (b) Lemieux, R. U.;
Ratcliffe, R. M. Can. J. Chem. 1979, 57, 1244. For a recent modification,
see: (c) Seeberger, P. H.; Roehrig, S.; Schell, P.; Wang, Y.; Christ, W.
J. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 328, 61.
(7) (a) Leblanc, Y.; Fitzsimmons, B. J.; Springer, J. P.; Rokacht, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2995. (b) Fitzsimmons, B. J.; Leblanc, Y.; Rokacht,
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 285. (c) Fitzsimmons, B. J.; Leblanc, Y.;
Chan, N.; Rokacht, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5229.
(8) For reviews of azide cycloadditions, see: (a) Sha, C.-K.; Mohanakrishnan,
A. K. Chem. Heterocycl. Comput. 2002, 59, 623. (b) Koumbis, A. E.;
Gallos, J. K. Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 771.
(9) For a review of triazolines as aziridine equivalents, see: Semenov, V. P.
Russ. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 32, 1576 (Zh. Org. Khim. 1996, 32, 1627).
(10) For recent work on the intramolecular cyclization of carbamoyl- and
azidoglycals, see: (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Baran, P. S.; Zhong, Y.-L.;
Barluenga, S.; Hunt, K. W.; Kranich, R.; Vega, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 2233 and references therein. (b) Churchill, D. G.; Rojas, C.
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7225 and references therein.
absence of added nucleophile. Under these conditions, the acetone-
derived C-glycoside (15) could be isolated in good yield (74%).
With regard to the glycal and azide components, matching the
electronic character of the components is essential. Glycal 1 failed
to undergo cycloaddition with electron-deficient azides such as TsN3
or BocN3. Condensation of BnN3 with tri-O-benzyl glucal was
similarly ineffective under our conditions, as was reaction with
dihydropyran. While alkynes react readily with numerous azides,
alkene/azide cycloadditions most commonly involve either an
electron-rich azide/electron-poor alkene pair or an electron-rich
alkene/electron-poor azide pair.18 The reaction of 1 and BnN3
appears to fall into the former category, suggesting that 1 acts as
an electron-deficient alkene despite the fact that enol ethers are
typically regarded as nucleophilic/electron rich. (While unusual,
this is entirely consistent with the requirement for the C3/C4 acetate
groups; vide infra.)
In contrast, and as expected on the basis of the reactivity of 1,
tri-O-acetyl-D-galactal (16) undergoes ready cycloaddition with
benzyl azide to form triazoline 17; subsequent photolysis and ring
opening efficiently provide the corresponding methylglycoside (18,
94%; Scheme 3; conditions as Scheme 2). Equally important, serial
replacement of the acetate groups has revealed that although the
C3/C4 acetates are required, 2,3-di-O-acetyl-6-O-tert-butyldi-
methylsilyl-D-glucal (19) reacts with benzyl azide to form triazoline
20 in moderate (57%) yield.19 Subsequent photochemical ring
contraction and opening cleanly afford methyl glycoside 21 (88%).
A final observation suggests further expansion of the substrate
scope: benzyl azide and vinyl acetate react readily under our
standard conditions, although rapid in situ elimination leads to
formation of N-benzyltriazole as the only isolable product. Thus,
while the issue of elimination must be addressed, the methodology
can be extended to acyclic alkenes.
(11) While we have encountered no problems in this respect, CAUTION should
always be used when heating solutions of azides.
(12) We believe the acid- and base-lability of the triazoline lead to the re-
quirement for trialkyl orthoformate as a non-basic acid-scavenging solvent.
(13) For early examples of the photochemical generation of aziridines from
triazolines, see: (a) Scheiner, P. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 2022. (b)
Scheiner, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 988. (c) Scheiner, P. Tetrahedron
1968, 24, 2757.
(14) The solvent specificity and requirement for a quartz reaction vessel are
evidence that acetone serves both as solvent and triplet sensitizer for
aziridine formation. For a previous example of sensitized photochemical
conversion of a triazoline to an aziridine, see ref 12b.
(15) See Supporting Information for experimental details and 1H NMR spectra.
(16) C2 configurations were assigned based on X-ray crystallographic analysis
of 4b. The C1 configuration was assigned based on 1H coupling constants.
(17) Formation of the acetone adduct could also proceed through O-alkylation
of acetone followed by rearrangement. We thank Prof. C. Rojas (Barnard
College) for bringing this possibility to our attention. See: Zhang, Y.;
Reynolds, N. T.; Manju, K.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9720.
(18) For examples and discussion, see: (a) Gothelf, K. V.; Jørgensen, K. A.
Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 863. (b) Scriven, E. F. V.; Turnbull, K. Chem. ReV.
1988, 88, 298.
(19) Loss of the TBS group during the cycloaddition accounts for the majority
of material loss. Optimization is currently under way in the context of
identifying an appropriate silyl linker for solid-phase synthesis.
In conclusion, we have discovered a new route to aminoglyco-
sides based on the formation of triazolines from a readily available
glycal precursor followed by efficient formation and ring-opening
JA0319238
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 27, 2004 8357