3896
C. M. Ahn et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 3893–3896
Commun. 2002, 297, 934; (c) Grandjean-Laquerriere, A.;
(2,6)H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 55.8, 86.8, 90.0, 111.3,
114.1, 118.6, 124.4, 125.8, 136.5, 143.8, 146.2, 149.0ppm;
GC/MSD (m=z) 371. For 10: TLC (chloroform/metha-
nol ¼ 95/5) Rf ¼ 0:63; 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 3.91 (6H, s,
OCH3), 5.79 (2H, s, OH), 6.87–6.89 (2H, d, J ¼ 4:9 Hz,
Ar–H), 6.98–6.99 (2H, d, J ¼ 1:8 Hz, Ar–H), 7.05–7.07
(2H, t, J ¼ 8:2 Hz, Ar–H), 7.14 (2H, s, furan-H); 13C
NMR (CDCl3): d 56.0, 79.6, 95.1, 113.6, 114.0, 114.6,
125.6, 132.7, 137.0, 146.2, 146.7 ppm; GC/MSD (m=z) 376.
12. Mosmann, T. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55, Assay
method: HUVEC in EBM-2 medium containing the
growth factor (Cambrex, Walkersville, MD) was plated
in a 48-well plate (10,000 cells/well) for 4 h to allow cells to
adhere on the plate. The test compounds, diluted in the
medium, were added to the appropriate wells, and
incubated for 72 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified
atmosphere. After incubation, the viability of HUVEC
Gangloff, S. C.; Naour, R. L.; Trentesaux, C.; Hornebeck,
W.; Guenounou, M. Cytokine 2002, 18, 168; (d) Rao, C.
V.; Simi, B.; Reddy, B. S. Carcinogenesis 1993, 14, 2219;
(e) Logan-Smith, M. J.; Locker, P. J.; East, J. M.; Lee, A.
G. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 46905.
7. Arbiser, J. L.; Klauber, N.; Rohan, R.; van Leeuwen, R.;
Huang, M. T.; Fisher, C.; Flynn, E.; Byers, H. R. Mol.
Med. 1998, 4, 376.
8. Shim, J. S.; Kim, D. H.; Jung, H. J.; Kim, J. H.; Lim, D.;
Lee, S. K.; Kim, K.-W.; Ahn, J. W.; Yoo, J.-S.; Rho, J.-
R.; Shin, J.; Kwon, H. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10,
2987.
9. Robinson, T. P.; Ehlers, T.; Hubbard, R. B., IV; Bai, X.;
Arbiser, J. L.; Goldsmith, D. J.; Bowen, J. P. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 115.
10. Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1975, 16, 4467.
was assayed using
a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-
11. Analytical data for 6: mp >400 °C; TLC (chloroform/
methanol ¼ 95/5) Rf ¼ 0:31; 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 3.91
(6H, s, OCH3), 5.82 (2H, s, OH), 6.89–6.91 (2H, d,
J ¼ 8:2 Hz, Ar–H), 7.14–7.18 (4H, m, Ar–H), 7.42–7.44
(2H, d, pyridine–(3,5)H), 7.66 (1H, t, J ¼ 7:8 Hz, pyri-
dine–(4)H) ppm; 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): d 56.5, 87.5, 90.9,
112.3, 116.1, 116.7, 126.4, 126.7, 138.3, 144.0, 148.5,
149.4 ppm; GC/MSD (m=z) 371. For 8: mp 175–177 °C;
TLC (chloroform/methanol ¼ 95/5) Rf ¼ 0:33; 1H NMR
(CDCl3): d 3.94 (6H, s, OCH3), 5.83 (2H, s, OH), 6.91–
6.93 (2H, d, J ¼ 8:2 Hz, Ar–H), 7.04 (2H, d, J ¼ 1:8 Hz,
Ar–H), 7.10–7.13 (2H, t, J ¼ 8:2 Hz, Ar–H), 7.94–7.95
(1H, t, J ¼ 1:8 Hz, pyridine–(4)H), 8.64 (2H, s, pyridine–
diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) colorimetric prolif-
eration assay.
13. Aoki, K.; Watanabe, K.; Sato, M.; Ikekita, M.; Haka-
matsuka, T.; Oikawa, T. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 459,
131, Assay method: Tube formation of HUVEC on
Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) was assayed in
a 96-well plate. HUVEC was seeded on 50 lL solidified
Matrigel, and incubated for 16 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2
humidified atomosphere. After incubation, the cells were
stained with toluidin blue in 4% paraformaldehyde, and
photographed. A blinded observer quantified the number
of tube branches. Each concentration of the control or test
compound was assayed in triplicate.