Fe(0)-Mediated Synthesis of Olefins from Carbonyls
to impart chromium’s stereoselectivity,13 for instance, 16f17
(86%, Z/E > 99:1).
SCHEME 1
The range of suitable polyhalogenated substrates encompassed
ethyl dichlorofluoroacetate 20, methyl tribromoacetate 22,
tribromoacetic acid 24, ethyl dibromoacetate 26, trichloroaceto-
nitrile 28, and methyl 2,2-dichloro-2-methoxyacetate 31. These
provided access to (Z)-R-fluoroacrylate 21 (entry 10), (Z)-R-
bromoacrylate 23 (entry 11),14 (Z)-R-bromoacrylic acid 25 (entry
12), (E)-acrylate 27 (entry 13),15 R-chloro-R,â-unsaturated
nitriles 29/30 (entries 14 and 15), and (Z)-R-methoxyacrylate
32 (entry 16) in good to excellent yields. While the yields and
stereoselectivities were broadly similar, the superior functional
group compatibility of Fe(0) is patently evident in entries 12
and 15; only in entry 16 was the result with Fe(0) unsatisfactory.
Results and Discussion
It was anticipated that Cr(II) and Fe(0) would mediate many
of the same transformations since they have similar reduction
potentials (-0.41 and -0.45 V vs SHE, respectively).8 On the
other hand, the disparities (e.g., geometry, aggregation, and
Lewis acidity) manifested by organoiron reagents9 and compa-
rable organochromium species8 augured for useful variances in
stereoselectivity and/or functional group compatibility.
It was also gratifying to discover that a wide variety of
ketones were suitable condensation partners for trichloroacetates
(Table 2).16 Tetra-substituted olefins were generated in good
yields from aryl ketones 33 and 35 (entries 1 and 2), conjugated
ketones 37, 39, and 41 (entries 3, 4 and 5), and aliphatic methyl
ketones 43 and 45 (entries 6 and 7). Despite reports that benzyl
ethers are cleaved under some circumstances by iron and
chromium salts,17 we observed no evidence of this during the
reactions of 35.18 One should also note that while Cr(II)-
mediated condensations typically gave somewhat better yields,
for the sensitive cyclic ketone 41, Fe(0) was more efficacious
(entry 5). As might be anticipated, the E/Z ratio of the products
varied in accordance with the steric differential of the opposing
ketone appendages. The most noteworthy and unexpected result
was the moderate to high E-selectivity observed for all of the
Fe(0) reactions and all but one of the Cr(II) reactions. This is
in stark contrast to the Z-stereoselectivity characteristic of
aldehydes (Table 1).19,20 Furthermore, inspection of the data in
Table 2 reveals Fe(0) was consistently more stereoselective than
Cr(II).
The former prediction was confirmed during condensations
of benzaldehyde 1 and 4-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde 4 with
methyl trichloroacetate 2 in THF using Fe powder at 23-60
°C overnight or, as previously reported,1d using CrCl2 at room
temperature for 1-2 h. The yields and Z-stereoselectivities for
R-chloroacrylates 3 and 5 were outstanding and essentially
equivalent for both reagents (Table 1, entries 1 and 2,
respectively). As expected, Rieke iron exhibited higher reactivity
than commercial Fe(0) powder.10,11 All of the starting materials
were consumed after just 1 h at room temperature, but complex
product mixtures of R-chloroacrylate, dehalogenated acrylate,
dichlorohydrin, and uncharacterized compounds were obtained.
A determination of the scope of the condensation also
revealed some significant differences between the metal reduc-
tants. Under the influence of Fe(0) powder, phenol 6 and nitro
8 afforded 7 (entry 3) and 9 (entry 4), respectively, in good
yields and stereocontrol (Z/E > 99:1). The lack of competitive
aryl nitro reduction under these conditions is noteworthy.12 In
contrast, 6 and 8 did not react with CrCl2, even under forcing
conditions (refluxing THF, 12 h), and could be recovered
unchanged. Heterocyclic aldehydes were well tolerated as seen
in the smooth conversions of indole 10, furan 12, and thiophene
14 into the corresponding adducts 11 (entry 5),1d 13 (entry 6),
and 15 (entry 7). In this series, chromium displayed the superior
Z-stereoselectivity, whereas iron gave somewhat better yields,
except with indole 10. Conjugated and aliphatic aldehydes
behaved analogously, for example, 16f17 (entry 8) and 18f19
(entry 9), with CrCl2 providing nominally better yields and
conspicuously better Z/E ratios. Interestingly, the presence of
catalytic CrCl2 (20 mol %) under the usual Fe(0) reaction
conditions [Fe(0) (8 equiv), THF, 55 °C, 14 h] was sufficient
(13) CrCl3/Fe(0) redox systems have been described: Hu, C. M.; Chen,
J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 72.
(14) Control experiments indicate that 23 and 25 are stable under the
reaction conditions. We speculate the minor amounts of debrominated
byproducts arise via double metalation of the initial Reformatsky-type adduct
i to give ii. We and others have previously invoked the generation of gem-
dichromium intermediates: Baati, R.; Barma, D. K.; Falck, J. R.; Miosk-
owski, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9196. The greater reactivity of
bromides makes this process partially competitive with the pathway in Figure
1.
(6) (a) Mironiuk-Puchalska, E.; Kolaczkowska, E.; Sas, W. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 8351. (b) Dollt, H.; Zabel, V. Aust. J. Chem. 1999, 52, 259.
(c) Kakehi, A.; Ito, S. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 1542. (d) Marvel, C. S.;
Weil, E. D.; Wakefield, L. B.; Fairbanks, C. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953,
75, 2326.
(7) Stille: (a) Tanaka, K.; Katsumura, S. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 373.
Sonogashira: (b) Dai, W. M.; Wu, J. L.; Fong, K. C.; Lee, M. Y. H.; Lau,
C. W. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5062. Suzuki: (c) Zhou, S. M.; Yan, Y. L.;
Deng, M. Z. Synlett 1998, 198. (d) Rossi, R.; Bellina, F.; Bechini, C.;
Mannina, L.; Vergamini, P. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 135. (e) Zhang, X. G.;
Qing, F. L.; Yu, Y. H. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7075. (f) Qing, F. L.; Zhang,
X. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5929.
(15) For a mechanistically related, stereoselective synthesis of (E)-R,â-
unsaturated esters using SmI2, see: Concellon, J. M.; Concellon, C.; Mejica,
C. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6111.
(16) In sharp contrast, reactions of methyl tribromoacetate with ketones
afforded complex product mixtures. This may reflect its greater steric profile
and/or the proclivity of the more reactive bromides toward undesired side
reactions.
(8) Wessjohann, L. A.; Scheid, G. Synthesis 1999, 1.
(9) Rosenblum, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1974, 7, 122.
(10) Rieke, R. D. Science 1989, 246, 1260.
(11) Fe(0) powder (<10 µm, 99.9%) was purchased from Aldrich and
Alfa Aeser and stored/handled under an inert atmosphere to minimize
formation of an oxide coating.
(12) Wang, L.; Li, P. H.; Wu, Z. T.; Yan, J. C.; Wang, M.; Ding, Y. B.
Synthesis 2003, 2001.
(17) (a) Rodebaugh, R.; Debenham, J. S.; Fraser-Reid, B. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1996, 37, 5477. (b) Park, M. H.; Takeda, R.; Nakanishi, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1987, 28, 3823.
(18) Considering standard reduction potentials of Fe(II)/Fe (-0.45 V),
Fe(III)/Fe (-0.04 V), and Fe(III)/Fe(II) (+0.77 V) compared to Cr(III)/
Cr(II) (-0.41 V), we postulate the formation of Fe(II) salts in the tandem
Reformatsky elimination reaction.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 71, No. 21, 2006 8179