C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
The variable-temperature 1H NMR kinetic study of this reaction
(Figure 3) reveals the gradual consumption of 1 (a) and formation
of 2 (b and c), including the byproduct Me3SiCCSiMe3 (d) in I. In
II, this process is accompanied by the occurrence and quick
disappearance of some resonances, indicating that this conversion
proceeds via the proposed intermediates A and B to completion.
Thus, an unusual conversion of 1 with CS2 to 2 has been shown,
where the search of sterically and energetically favored unsaturated
substrate CS2 is crucial. An investigation on such selenium- or
tellurium-containing heterocycles is in progress.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Go¨ttinger Akademie der Wissen-
schaften.
Figure 2. Molecular structure of 3 (without H atoms). Selected bond lengths
(Å) and angles (deg): Al(1)-O(1) 1.7696(12), Al(1)-C(3) 1.9891(17),
C(1)-O(1) 1.331(2), C(1)-O(2) 1.218(2), C(1)-C(2) 1.530(2), C(2)-C(3)
1.364(2); O(1)-C(1)-O(2) 121.78(15).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental Section, includ-
ing detailed synthetic procedures, analytical and spectral characterization
data, and DFT calculations (PDF), as well as CIF data for 2 and 3.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) Taylor, E. C. The Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds; Wiley: New
York, 1993.
(2) (a) Geoffrey, F.; Cloke, N.; Hanson, G. R.; Henderson, M. J.; Hitchcock,
P. B.; Raston, C. L. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 1002. (b)
Geoffrey, F.; Cloke, N.; Dalby, C. I.; Henderson, M. J.; Hitchcock, P. B.;
Kennard, C. H. L.; Lamb, R. N.; Raston, C. L. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1990, 1394. (c) Schoeller, W. W.; Grigoleit, S. J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 2002, 405. (d) Baker, R. J.; Farley, R. D.; Jones, C.; Kloth,
M.; Murphy, D. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 2002, 97.
(3) (a) Brown, D. S.; Decken, A.; Cowley, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 5421. (b) Schmidt, E. S.; Jockisch, A.; Schmidbaur, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 9758.
(4) (a) Cui, C.; Roesky, H. W.; Schmidt, H.-G.; Noltemeyer, M.; Hao, H.;
Cimpoesu, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4274. (b) Hardman, N.
J.; Eichler, B. E.; Power, P. P. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1991.
(5) (a) Uhl, W.; Spies, T.; Koch, R.; Saak, W. Organometallics 1999, 18,
4598. (b) Cui, C.; Ko¨pke, S.; Herbst-Irmer, R.; Roesky, H. W.; Nolte-
meyer, M.; Schmidt, H.-G.; Wrackmeyer, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 9091.
(6) Eisch, J. J. In ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry II; Wilkinson,
G., Stone, F. G. A., Abel, E. W., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 1982; p
617.
(7) Selected examples: (a) Bai, G.; Roesky, H. W.; Hao, H. Inorg. Chem.
2001, 40, 2424. (b) Huang, D.; Folting, K.; Caulton, K. G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 10318. (c) Onitsuka, K.; Katayama, H.; Sonogashira, K.;
Ozawa, F. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 2267.
Figure 3. Variable-temperature 1H NMR kinetic studies of the reaction of
1 with excess CS2 in [D8]toluene. (I) Resonances of SiMe3 (0.10-0.55 ppm),
which correlate with changes of the η2-C2(SiMe3)2 group, and (II) resonances
of γ-CH protons (4.4-5.1 ppm) directly with the changes of LAl moieties
(a and e correspond to 1, b, c, f, and g to 2, and d to free Me3SiCCSiMe3).
(8) (a) Crystallographic data for 2‚0.55 toluene‚0.45 ether with Cu KR (λ )
1.54178 Å) radiation at 133(2) K: a ) 18.903(4), b ) 18.624(4), c )
20.125(4) Å, â ) 94.36(3)°, monoclinic, space group Cc, Z ) 4, R1
)
0.0339, wR2 ) 0.0728 for 8416 (I > 2σ(I)) data, and R1 ) 0.0421,
wR2 ) 0.0761 for all (9398) data. (b) Crystallographic data for 3‚0.89
ether‚0.11 toluene with Cu KR (λ ) 1.54178 Å) radiation at 100(2) K:
a ) 10.166(2), b ) 12.781(3), c ) 17.393(4) Å, R ) 77.19(3), â ) 87.82-
(3), γ ) 81.06(3)°, triclinic, space group P-1, Z ) 2, R1 ) 0.0357,
wR2 ) 0.0885 for 5857 (I > 2σ(I)) data, and R1 ) 0.0368, wR2 ) 0.0895
for all (6103) data.
plane. The remarkable feature of 2 is the SC(SiMe3)CC(SiMe3)
group. The similar adjacent C-C bond distances (1.316(4), 1.325-
(4) Å) and the almost linear C-C-C angle (178.0(3)°) indicate
the CdCdC allenyl functionality. A comparable example is only
observed in trans-Rh[η-C(CHdCH2)dCdCPh2](CO)(PiPr3)2]
(1.308(6) and 1.332(6) Å and 177.5(5)°).11 The IR spectrum shows
one weak band (1840 cm-1) assignable to this bridged thioallenyl
group. The deliberate 13C NMR spectral studies give an unambigu-
ous assignment of such allenyl (Al-C(SiMe3)dCdC(SiMe3)S)
carbon resonances (δ 212.70 (dCd); 80.60, broad (Al-Cd); 59.94
ppm (dC-S)).
(9) See some examples: (a) Uhl, W.; Vester, A.; Hiller, W. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1993, 443, 9. (b) Wehmschulte, R. J.; Power, P. P. Chem. Commun.
1998, 335. (c) Ecker, A.; Ko¨ppe, R.; U¨ ffing, C.; Schno¨ckel, H. Z. Anorg.
Allg. Chem. 1998, 624, 817. (d) Schnitter, C.; Klemp, A.; Roesky, H.
W.; Schmidt, H.-G.; Ro¨pken, C.; Herbst-Irmer, R.; Noltemeyer, M. Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 2033.
(10) Taghiof, M.; Heeg, M. J.; Bailey, M.; Dick, D. G.; Kumar, R.; Hendershot,
D. G.; Rahbarnoohi, H.; Oliver, J. P. Organometallics 1995, 14, 2903.
(11) Ishikawa, M.; Fuchikami, T.; Kumada, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101,
1348.
The crystal structure evidence of LAl[OC(O)C2(SiMe3)2] (3)5b,8b
may approach that of A (Figure 2). As expected, the CO2 was
inserted into one of the Al-C bonds to form a five-membered
AlC3O planar ring with an exo CdO group (∆ ) 0.0199 Å). The
longer bond distances and weaker bond strength of CS2 than those
of the corresponding CO212,13 might give rise to further interaction
of A with 1 and rearrangement of the CdSexo unit.
(12) Bond lengths of gas-phase CO2 and CS2 are 1.1600 and 1.5526 Å,
respectively. See: Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; Lide, D. R., Ed.;
2003-2004; Vol. 84, pp 9-19.
(13) Do (CO2, gas, 273 K) ) 526.1 ( 0.2 kJ/mol, Do (CS2, gas, 273 K) )
432.1 ( 2 kJ/mol: (a) McCulloh, K. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 59, 4250.
(b) Coppens, P.; Reynaert, J. C.; Drowart, J. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.
1979, 75, 292.
JA049462T
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 33, 2004 10195