4520
D.-Y. Shin et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 4519–4523
basis of structural features of mansonone F, its anti-
MRSA activities can be understood by two possible mode
of actions.6 The first mechanism involves generation of
superoxide, particularly cytotoxic superoxide radical,
which was reported for anti-bacterial and anti-protozoal
activities of several naphthoquinones and isoxazolyl
naphthoquinones.7 However, we have observed that no
strains survived when we cultured the strain of S. aureus
over the MIC of mansonone F in the presence of 4,5-
dihydroxy-1,3-benzene-disulfonic acid (Tiron, SIGMA),
a specific superoxide scavenger. This supported that the
anti-bacterial activity of mansonone F is not mainly due
to the production of cytotoxic superoxide radical. The
possible alternative mechanism is an attack of certain
nucleophile such as thiol, amine, or alcohol of the bacte-
rial growth-related enzymes to the enedione carbonyl of
mansonone F, thus rendering the corresponding enzyme
inactive although base stacking or intercalation of the
planar oxaphenalene system in bacterial DNA is also
possible.8 This is partly supported by recent report in
several literatures of 1,2 or 1,4-addition of thiol and
nitrogen nucleophile to quinone moiety.9 Thus, these
recent information gave us a starting point for the studies
on structure–activity relationship of mansonone F that
was initially focused on the identification of pharmaco-
phoric parts of mansonone F and the role of C-ring sys-
tem including C3 substituents effects on anti-bacterial effect.
NO2
O
O
i, ii
iii, iv
OH
OMe
6
OMe
5
7
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) MeI, NaH, THF, 97%; (ii)
Cu(NO3)2ÆxH2O, Ac2O, rt, 73%; (iii) 10% Pd/C, H2, MeOH, rt; (iv)
Fremy’s salt, 0.06 M NaH2PO4, acetone, rt, 65% for two steps.
The analog 7, which consists of A,B-ring skeleton of
mansonone F, was prepared by four steps sequence as
shown in Scheme 1. O-Methylation of 2,5-dimethyl-1-
naphthol (5) with methyl iodide, nitration of the
resulting methyl ether, followed by catalytic hydroge-
nation, and Teuber oxidation afforded the naphthoqui-
none 7.
The tricyclic analogs 11a–f were prepared according to
the synthetic method5a developed for the synthesis of
mansonone F with some proper modifications. Sodium
borohydride reduction of the intermediate 8 or appro-
priate Grignard addition reactions provided the sec-
ondary alcohol 9a or the tertiary alcohols 9b, 9e, and 9f.
The vinyl alcohol 9c was obtained by reaction of 8 with
organocerium reagent prepared from vinylmagnesium
chloride and anhydrous cerium chloride. Reduction
(10% Pd/C, H2, MeOH) of nitro group of 9a, 9b, and
9d–f followed by direct amine oxidation gave the tri-
cyclic quinoids 10a, 10b, and 10d–f. Chemoselective
reduction of nitro group of the nitrated product of 9c in
the presence of terminal olefin could be achieved by a
combination of sodium borohydride and element sulfur.
Finally, dehydration of the tertiary alcohols was carried
out by Burgess procedure or under acidic or basic con-
ditions.
2. Chemistry
Most of the structural analogs were synthesized starting
from the intermediate 5 or 8 according to the divergent
synthetic routes as shown in Schemes 1 and 2. The
known analogs 2 and 3, which are devoid of ortho-qui-
none moiety, were prepared from the tricyclic ketone 85a
and the benzoquinone analog 4 as an A-ring equivalent
of mansonone F is commercially available.
The analogs 12a–c were obtained by hydrogenolysis of
the corresponding alcohols prepared by carbonyl
reduction or Grignard addition of 8. The dicarbonyl
moiety was introduced by analogy with 11a–f. The
analogs 13a and 13b were prepared by sequential Hor-
ner–Emmons reaction of ketone 8, catalytic hydroge-
NO2
O
O
O
O
OMe
2
3
4
O
O
O
O
O
iii, iv
v
i
OH
R
OH
R
O
O
O
O
R
10a R = H
11a R = H
8
9a R = H
11b R = CH CH
9b R = CH CH
10b R = CH CH
2
3
2
3
2
3
11c R = CHCH
9c R = CHCH
2
10c R = CHCH
2
2
ii
11d R = CH CH OH
2
2
3 2
2 2
9d R = CH CH OH
10d R = CH CH OH
2
2
2
2
11e R = CH(CH )
9e R = CH(CH )
10e R = CH(CH )
3 2
3 2
11f R = CH (CH ) CH
3
2
9f R = CH (CH ) CH
10f R = CH (CH ) CH
2
2 2
3
2
2 2
3
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (i) DIBAL, CH2Cl2, )78 °C, 94% for 9a; RMgBr, Et2O, rt, 72–93% for 9b, 9e, and 9f; CH2CHMgBr, CeCl3,
THF, )78 °C to 0 °C, 78% for 9c; (ii) BH3ÆMe2S, THF, 0 °C then H2O2, NaOH, 43%; (iii) Cu(NO3)2ÆxH2O, Ac2O, rt, 65–87%; (iv) 10% Pd/C, H2,
MeOH, rt then Fremy’s salt, 0.06 M NaH2PO4, acetone, rt, 56–78% for 10a, 10b, and 10d–f; sulfur, NaBH4, THF, reflux then Fremy’s salt, 0.06 M
NaH2PO4, acetone, rt, 75% for 10c; (v) Burgess reagent, benzene, reflux, 47% for 11a; H2SO4/EtOH (1:20), reflux, 37–67% for 11b and 11d–f; MsCl,
DMAP, Et3N, CH2Cl2, )78 °C, 13% for 11c.