118
R. KUMAR ET AL.
REFERENCES
1. Daniel, M.C.; Astruc, D. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 293–346.
2. Henglein, A. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1861–1873.
3. Templeton, A.C.; Wuelfing, W.P.; Murray, R.W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33,
27–36.
4. Schmid, G.; Corain, B. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 17, 3081–3098.
5. (a) Rylander, P.N. In Catalytic Hydrogenation in Organic Synthesis; Aca-
demic Press: New York, 1979, 285–290 (b) Baumeister, P.N.; Studer, M.;
Roessler, F. In Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, Ertl, G.; Knozinger,
H.; Weitkamp, J. (eds.), Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1997, 2186–2209 (c)
Blaser, H.U.; Siegrist, U.; Steiner, H.; Studer, M. In Fine Chemicals through
Heterogeneous Catalysis; Sheldon, R.A.; Bekkum, H.V. Eds. Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2001, 389–406.
92
90
88
86
84
82
80
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
No. of Cycle
6. (a) Feldheim, D. L.; Foss, C.A. Jr. Metal Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Char-
acterization, and Application; Marcel, D. New York, 2002. (b) Stiles, A.B.
(ed.) Catalyst Supports and Supported Catalysts; Butterworths: Boston,
1987. (c) Ertl, G.; Knozinger, H.; Weitkamp, J. (eds.) Handbook of Het-
erogeneous Catalysis; VCH: Weinheim, 1997. (d) Verma, A.K.; Kumar,
R.; Chaudhary, P.; Saxena, A.; Shankar, R.; Mozumdar S.; Chandra, R.
Tetrahedron. Lett. 2005, 46, 5229–5232.
7. (a) Negishi, E.I. (ed.) In Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for
Organic Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2002. (b) Stahl, S.S.
Angew. Chem.; Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3400–3420.
8. Schlogl, R.; Hamid, S.B.A. Angew. Chem.; Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1628–1637.
(b) Roucoux, J.S.; Patin, H. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 3757–3778. (c) Son,
S.U.; Jang, Y.; Park, J.; Na, H.B.; Park, H.M.; Yun, H.J.; Lee, J.; Hyeon, T. J.
Am. Chem. Soc, 2004, 126, 5026–5027. (d) Thomas, J.M.; Johnson, B.F.G.;
Raja, R.; Sankar, G.; Midgley, P.A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 20–30.
9. Mallat, T.; Baiker, A. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3037–3058.
10. (a) Jansat,V; Gomez, M.; Philippot, K.; Muller, G.; Guiu, E.; Claver,
C.; Castillon, S.; Chaudret, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1592–
1593. (b) Moreno-Manas, M.; Pleixats, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36,
638–643.
11. Choudary, B.M.; Madhi, S.; Chowdari, V.; Kantam, M.L.; Sreedhar, B. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14127–14136. (b) Djakovitch, L.; Koehler, K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5990–5999.
12. Chauhan, B.P.; Rathore, J.S.; Chauhan, M.; Krawicz, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 2876–2887. (b) Biffis, A.; Zecca, M.; Basato, M. J. Mol. Catal.
A: Chem. 2001, 173, 249–274.
13. Ooe, M.; Murata, M.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 1604–1605.
14. Kidambi, D.J.,and Li, J; Bruening, M.L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
2658–2659.
FIG. 3. Recyclability chart.
might explain its diminished catalytic activity. The product ob-
tained in the reaction with polymeric PEG10k-Pd nanoparticles
was similar to that of commercially available Pt/C[27] in pro-
ducing large amounts of aniline (Entry 1, Table 1). However,
the yield of the nitro reduction product for such reactions has
no effect by using a longer reaction time. In general, the re-
actions are clean. All of the products were obtained in high
yields. The polymeric PEG10k-Pd nanoparticles were recov-
ered by centrifugation after reaction and were reused for sub-
sequent runs. It was found that up to 8 runs the catalysts are
appreciably active (Figure 3; recyclability chart); however, ev-
ery time during exposure the polymeric PEG10k-Pd catalysts
show a tendency to undergo agglomerization as observed by
TEM image (Figure 1c) (particle size more 160 nm in place
of starting average 112 nm) taken before seventh cycle. Thus,
they suffer a gradual loss of activity with increase of particle
size in subsequent runs. The present procedure is superior to
several earlier methods in that it does not use any organic sol-
vent except for workup. Also, nanoparticles can be used straight
after preparation without any purification steps.[30,31] Spectro-
scopic data of reduced products of entries 9–14 are reported in
the literature.[32]
15. (a) Huang, J.; Jiang, T.; Gao, H.; Han, B. Liu, Z.; Wu, W. Chang, Y.; Zhao,
G. Angew. Chem.; Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1397–1399. (b) Dupont, J.; Fonseca,
G.S.; Umpierre, A.P.; Fichtner, P.F.P.; Teixeira, S.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 4228–4229.
4. CONCLUSIONS
16. Ahmadian Namini, P.; Babaluo, A.A.; Bayati, B. IJNN, 2007, 3, 37–43.
17. Furst, A.; Berlo, R.C.; Hooton, S. Chem. Rev. 1965, 65, 51–68.
18. Brieger, G.; Nestrick, T.J. Chem. Rev. 1974, 74, 567–580.
19. Johnstone, R.A.W.; Wilby, A.H.; Entwistle, L.D. Chem. Rev. 1985, 85,
129–170.
In conclusion, we have developed a simple synthetic method
for an easily recyclable polymeric PEG10k-Pd nanoparticles
catalyst from readily available reagents, and demonstrated its
high activity in reduction of aromatic nitro compounds. The
present procedure using polymeric PEG10k-Pd nanoparticles
and hydrazine hydrate provides a very simple and efficient
methodology for highly chemoselelective reductions of aro-
matic nitro compounds. In our catalytic system, nobility is
present because of the presence of Pd and eco-friendly polymer
PEG10k. We are investigating the basis of the distinctive cat-
alytic activity of palladium nanoparticles in polyethylene glycol
molecular weight 10000. Further studies to explore the applica-
tion of polymeric PEG10k-Pd nanoparticles as catalyst in other
reactions are in progress.
20. Kumar, R.; Chaudhary, P.; Nimesh, S.; Verma A.K.; Chandra, R. Green
Chem. 2006, 8, 519–521.
21. (a) Kumar, R.; Chaudhary, P.; Nimesh, S.; Verma A.K.; Chandra, R. Green
Chem. 2006, 8, 356–358. (b) Harris, J.M. (ed.) Poly(ethylene Glycol) Chem-
istry, Biotechnological and Biomedical Applications;Plenum Press: New
York, 1992, 41, 233–234; Polyethylene Glycol: Chemistry and Biological
Application, ACS Books, Washington, DC, 1997. (c) Yadav, V.; Lagarkha,
R.; Kumar, R. Asian J. Chem. 2009, 21, 5591–5597.
22. Sauvagnat, B.; Lamaty, F.; Lazaro, R.; Martinez, J. Surf. Chem. Catal. 1998,
777–782.
23. Chandrasekhar, S.; Narsihmulu, C.; Sultana, S.S.; Reddy, N.R. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 4399–4401.