4436
S. Caldarelli et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 4435–4438
2. Chemistry
The FPB methodology developed in our laboratory is a
liquid-phase procedure that allows to prepare PNA
from fully amino-protected (aminoethylglycinamide)
polymers such as 3–6 (Fig. 2).7–11 The retrosynthetic
pathway to compounds 1 and 2, which contain two dif-
ferent kinds of nucleic bases (U and C), is illustrated in
Figure 2. These compounds result from their respective
cyclic precursors 3 and 4 in which the six secondary
amine groups of the backbone are protected by two
kinds of orthogonal PA and PB groups. These cyclic pre-
cursors stem, respectively, from linear backbones 5 and
6 whose N and C-extremities are protected by P1 and P2
groups, and from the corresponding linkers 7 and 8.
The synthetic procedure to compound 2 was adapted
from the procedure applied to the synthesis of com-
pound 1. This derivative was previously constructed by
using the set of protecting groups: Boc (P1), methyl
(P2), Troc (PA) and Alloc (PB) (Fig. 2).7,13 However,
the cadmium-promoted Troc cleavage required a tedi-
ous purification step to remove the cadmium salts. These
drawbacks led us to develop an alternative strategy for
the synthesis of compound 2, in which the Boc group re-
places the Troc one as PA. Consequently, we selected the
Mmt group as P1, because its cleavage can be achieved
without affecting the other protecting groups (Boc, Al-
loc, Me) present in the protected hexameric key synthon
6. The synthesis of 6 was performed via a divergent
approach using the monomer protected 2-aminoethyl-
glycine building blocks 9–12 as starting materials8
(Scheme 1). Coupling the acid monomers 9 and 11 with
the amine components 10 and 12, respectively, afforded,
after N- and C-deprotections, acid 13 and amine 14 di-
mers, respectively. Condensation of 13 with 14 led, after
N-deprotection, to tetramer 15, which was conjugated to
acid dimer 13 to afford the desired hexamer 6. Mmt de-
protection (step c) was performed in mild conditions by
means of 2% TFA in CH2Cl2. Saponification (step b)
was carried out using 1N LiOH. The condensation steps
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) iBuOCOCl, TEA, CH2Cl2
(80%); (b) LiOH (1N), THF (80%); (c) 2% TFA/CH2Cl2 (85–90%).
(step a) between the monomers (9+10 and 11+12) or di-
mers (13+14), or dimer and tetramer moieties (13+15)
were all performed via chloroformate activation (iBuO-
COCl). All the reactions described in Scheme 1 occurred
in high yields (from 80% to almost quantitative).
Concerning the protected lysine-based linker 8, the
e-amine function of lysine was masked with the Dde
protecting group (Fig. 2), which was selected for its sta-
bility towards Mmt, Boc and Alloc cleavage conditions.
Compound 8 was constructed starting from Boc-Lys(D-
de)OH 16 and from aminocaproic methyl ester 17
(Scheme 2). A series of classical protection, condensa-
tion and deprotection steps gave acid 18 and amine 19,
which were subsequently condensed to afford the desired
protected linker 8 in good overall yield (60%).
The last stages of the synthesis of 2, starting from hexa-
PNA 6 and linker 8 are described in Scheme 3. These
two reagents were first deprotected into the acid linker
20 and amine PNA moiety 21 in 75% yield. It should
be mentioned that saponification of 8 was cleanly
achieved with LiOH in presence of Ca2+ ions, which
circumvented the OHꢀ catalyzed Dde cleavage. Conden-
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) Mmt-Cl, TEA, CH2Cl2
(100%); (b) 1N LiOH, THF (75%); (c) Bop, DIPEA, DMF (80–
85%); (d) AcCl, MeOH (93%).
Figure 2. Retrosynthetic route to compounds 1 and 2.