3638
X. Franck et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 3635–3638
treatment with mesyl chloride and triethyl amine),
whereas compound 1012 was directly produced by the
treatment of quinaldine and 2,4-dimethoxybenzaldehyde
under reflux of acetic anhydride. Compounds 11 and 12
were obtained by reductive amination of 2-quinaldehyde
with the corresponding amines. Amides 13–15 were
obtained by coupling reaction of the unsaturated car-
boxylic acid chloride with the corresponding amines.
Compound 1613 was obtained by nitroaldol condensa-
tion of 2-quinaldehyde with nitromethane, followed
by mesyl chloride and triethyl amine treatment.
Compounds 17 and 18 were prepared by published
methods3a;b;c (Scheme 1). All the synthesized compounds
gave satisfactory spectral data.
Acknowledgements
CNRS is acknowledged for financial support, and
thanks are due to G. Epane, B. Vidovic, M. dos Santos
for their technical helps. We wish to thank particularly
Dr. J. R. L. Pink of Special Programme for Research
and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) and Pro-
gramme Drug Discovery (DDR). Association pour la
Recherche contre le Cancer (ARC) is acknowledged for
a financial support to R.M.
References and notes
Anti-protozoal, anti-retroviral and cytotoxicity activi-
ties of the synthesized quinolines 1–18 are presented in a
single Table 1. The tests against the amastigote forms of
T. brucei and T. cruzi, were performed as described.9
Compounds 6, 16, 17 showed the best activity, but were
still less active than suramin and nifurtimox, whereas 18
(T. cruzi: IC50 ¼ 0.15 lM) was more active than the
reference drug, nifurtimox (T. cruzi: IC50 ¼ 0.45 lM).
Against the amastigote forms of L. infantum9 the same
compounds 17 and 18 were more active than the refer-
ence drug, glucantime (IC50 ¼ 2 lM, with glucantime
IC50 ¼ 7.15 lM), whereas 16 was as active as the refer-
ence drug (IC50 ¼ 8 lM) and amides 13 and 15 showed
some interesting activity (IC50 ¼ 18 and 16 lM, respec-
tively). Again, compounds 17 and 18 were as active as
miltefosine, the oral reference drug (IC50 ¼ 3 lM),
against the amastigote forms of L. amazonensis. Against
P. falciparum resistant W2 strain, compound 3 showed a
1. Antoine, J. C.; Jouanne, C.; Ryter, A. Parasitology 1989,
99, 1547–1552.
ꢁ
2. (a) Fournet, A.; Hocquemiller, R.; Roblot, F.; Cave, A.;
Richomme, P.; Bruneton, J. J. Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 1547–
1552; (b) Fournet, A.; Vagneur, B.; Richomme, P.;
Bruneton, J. Can. J. Chem. 1989, 67, 2116–2118.
3. (a) Fakhfakh, M. A. 2001, Ph.D. Thesis. University of
^
Pari-Sud, Chatenay-Malabry, France; (b) Fakhfakh, M.
A.; Franck, X.; Fournet, A.; Hocquemiller, R.; Figadere,
ꢀ
B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3847–3850; (c) Fakhfakh,
ꢀ
M. A.; Franck, X.; Hocquemiller, R.; Figadere, B. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2001, 624, 131–135; (d) Fakhfakh, M.
ꢀ
A.; Franck, X.; Fournet, A.; Hocquemiller, R.; Figadere,
B. Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 2863–2875; (e) Seck, M.;
ꢀ
Franck, X.; Hocquemiller, R.; Figadere, B.; Peyrat, J. F.;
Provot, O.; Brion, J. D.; Alami, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
2004, 45, 1881–1884.
4. Fournet, A.; Ferreira, M. E.; Torres de Ortiz, S.; Fuentes,
S.; Nakayama, H.; Rojas de Arias, A.; Schinini, A.;
Hocquemiller, R. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1996, 40,
2447–2451.
5. Gantier, J. C.; Fournet, A.; Munos, M. H.; Hocquemiller,
R. Planta Med. 1996, 62, 285–286.
6. Nakayama, H.; Ferreira, M. E.; Rojas de Arias, A.; de
Bilbao, N. V.; Schinini, A.; Fournet, A. Phytother. Res.
2001, 15, 630–632.
surprising
activity
(IC50 ¼ 1 lM,
chloroquine:
IC50 ¼ 0.11 lM), whereas the corresponding dehydrated
compound 8 showed no activity. Against P. falciparum
sensitive Ghana strain, the same compound 3 showed
the best activity (IC50 ¼ 4 lM) but by far less active
than chloroquine (IC50 ¼ 0.018 lM). Then, the synthe-
sized compounds were tested against HTLV-1 trans-
formed cells, as already reported.10 The most active
compound was 16, showing 76% inhibition of the cells
proliferation at 10 lM. Compounds 6, 8, 17 showed a
weaker activity (26%, 26%, 34%, respectively) at 10 lM.
It is interesting to note that the tested compounds did
not show any cytotoxicity against normal cells, such as
macrophages, except for compounds 17 and 18.
€
7. Mekouar, K.; Mouscadet, J. F.; Desmaele, D.; Subra, F.;
Leh, H.; Savoure, D.; Auclair, C.; d’Angelo, J. J. Med.
ꢁ
Chem. 1998, 41, 2846–2857.
8. Zouhiri, F.; Mouscadet, J. F.; Mekouar, K.; Desmaele,
€
D.; Savoure, D.; Leh, H.; Subra, F.; Le Bret, M.; Auclair,
ꢁ
C.; d’Angelo, J. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 1533–1540.
9. Fakhfakh, M. A.; Prina, E.; Mouscadet, J. F.; Fournet,
ꢀ
A.; Franck, X.; Hocquemiller, R.; Figadere, B. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 5013–5023.
10. Fournet, A.; Mahieux, R.; Fakhfakh, M. A.; Franck, X.;
In conclusion, this study showed that among the quin-
olines tested in these assays, a new 2-substituted quin-
oline, compound 16, was found to exhibit promising
antiprotozoal activity (against T. cruzi). A fluorinated
product, compound 3, showed an interesting activity
against P. falciparum. Against HTLV-1 transformed
cells, again compound 16 showed a significant inhibition
activity. Further studies are now under way to evaluate
their in vivo activity.
ꢀ
Hocquemiller, R.; Figadere, B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2003, 13, 891–894.
11. Buates, S.; Matlashewski, G. J. Infect. Dis. 1999, 179,
1485–1494.
12. Bahner, C. T.; Rives, L. M.; McGaha, S. W.; Rutledge,
D.; Ford, D.; Gooch, E.; Westberry, D.; Ziegler, D.
Arzneimittelforschung 1981, 31, 404–406.
13. Shoeb, H. A.; Korkor, M. I.; Tammam, G. H. Pharmazie
1978, 33, 581–583.