Scheme 1
Scheme 2
membered macrolide framework, 24 stereogenic centers, and
a delicate triene side chain.
Recently, we reported a first-generation synthesis of (+)-
spongistatin 1 (1)8b exploiting an advanced C(29)-C(51) EF
Wittig salt. We have since redesigned the EF synthetic
strategy with two purposes in mind. First, we sought a
preparatively more effective synthesis of the EF fragment
by addressing some of the deficiencies encountered in our
earlier work. Second, we wished to exploit the modified
Petasis-Ferrier union/rearrangement tactic developed in our
laboratory to assemble the F-ring tetrahydropyran.12 With
these goals in mind, EF fragment (+)-3 was envisioned to
arise via the stereoselective allylation of bis-pyran iodide
(+)-5 with chlorodiene aldehyde 6 (Scheme 1). Further
synthetic analysis of (+)-5 revealed known dithiane (-)-
8,13 which, on the basis of our first-generation synthesis,8
would be coupled to F-ring aldehyde (+)-7, employing
chelation control to install the C(38) hydroxyl stereoselec-
tively. F-ring aldehyde (+)-7, in turn, would be assembled
by way of the Petasis-Ferrier union/rearrangement tactic.
Preparation of F-ring aldehyde (+)-7 (Scheme 2) began
with the TMSOTf-promoted14 union of bis-silyl â-hydroxy
acid (-)-915 with (4Z)-heptenal to afford dioxanone (-)-10
(86%, dr 12:1).16 Petasis-Tebbe methylenation (Cp2TiMe2)17
and exposure of the resulting enol ether to Me2AlCl to trigger
the Petasis-Ferrier rearrangement furnished pyranone (-)-
11 as a single isomer18 in 77% yield (two steps). After
considerable experimentation, introduction of the C(42)
Subsequent total syntheses now include those from the
Smith,8 Paterson,9 Crimmins,10 and Heathcock11 laboratories.
Structurally, the spongistatins possess a striking array of
features, which include two spiroketal moieties, a highly
substituted bis-tetrahydropyran unit encased in a 42-
(6) (a) Evans, D. A.; Coleman, P. J.; Dias, L. C.Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1997, 36, 2738. (b) Evans, D. A.; Trotter, B. W.; Coˆte´, B.; Coleman, P. J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2741. (c) Evans, D. A.; Trotter, B.
W.; Coˆte´, B.; Coleman, P. J.; Dias, L. C.; Tyler, A. N. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2744. (d) Evans, D. A.; Trotter, B. W.; Coleman, P. J.;
Coˆte´, B.; Dias, L. C.; Rajapakse, H. A.; Tyler, A. N. Tetrahedron 1999,
55, 8671.
(7) (a) Guo, J.; Duffy, K. J.; Stevens, K. L.; Dalko, P. I.; Roth, R. M.;
Hayward, M. M.; Kishi,Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 187. (b)
Hayward, M. M.; Roth, R. M.; Duffy, K. J.; Dalko, P. I.; Stevens, K. L.;
Guo, J.; Kishi, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 192.
(8) (a) Smith, A. B., III; Lin, Q.; Doughty, V. A.; Zhuang, L.; McBriar,
M. D.; Kerns, J. K.; Brook, C. S.; Murase, N.; Nakayama, K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 196. (b) Smith, A. B., III; Zhu, W.; Shirakami, S.;
Sfouggatakis, C.; Doughty, V. A.; Bennett, C. S.; Sakamoto, Y. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 761.
(9) Paterson, I.; Chen, D. Y.-K.; Coster, M. J.; Acena, J. L.; Bach, J.;
Gibson, K. R.; Keown, L. E.; Oballa, R. M.; Trieselmann, T.; Wallace, D.
J.; Hodgson, A. P.; Norcross, R. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4055.
(10) Crimmins, M. T.; Katz, J. D.; Washburn, D. G.; Allwein, S. P.;
McAtee, L. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5661.
(11) (a) Heathcock, C. H.; Hubbs, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
12836. (b) Heathcock, C. H.; McLaughlin, M.; Medina, J.; Hubbs, J. L.;
Wallace, G. A.; Scott, R.; Claffey, M. M.; Hayes, C. J.; Ott, G. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12844.
(12) (a) Ferrier, R. J.; Middleton, S. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 2779. (b)
Petasis, N. A.; Lu, S.-P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 141. (c) Smith, A. B.,
III; Verhoest, P. R.; Minbiole, K. P.; Lim, J. L. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 909 and
references therein.
(13) Smith, A. B., III; Zhuang, L.; Brook, C. S.; Boldi, A. M.; McBriar,
M. D.; Moser, W. H.; Murase, N.; Nakayama, K.; Verhoest, P. R.; Lin, Q.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8667.
(14) Seebach, D.; Imwinkelried, R.; Stucky, G. HelV. Chim. Acta 1987,
70, 448.
(15) Prepared in two steps exploiting Evans oxazolidinone chemistry;
see the Supporting Information.
(16) Upon scale-up, TfOH (∼9 mol %) was added, as the reaction does
not proceed otherwise, suggesting that adventitious water was more
pronounced on small scale thereby generating TfOH in situ.
(17) Petasis, N. A.; Bzowej, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6392.
(18) The stereochemistry in (-)-11 was established on the basis of NOEs
observed between the C(39), C(40), and C(43) hydrogens.
3638
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 20, 2004