J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2689-2691
2689
of them gets selectively displaced by nucleophiles. The
regiodifferentiation takes place in the SN2 step, wherein
the adjacent ester group favors the reaction at the C-2
to produce, once again, anti-R-Nu-â-hydroxy ester-type
compounds. The cyclic activating groups studied in this
approach include cyclic sulfates,5 sulfites,6 carbonates,7
and thionocarbonates8 as well as cyclic acetoxonium ions.9
The cyclic thionocarbonates8 and more recent cyclic
iminocarbonates10 are unique in that they can undergo
rearrangements to protected hydroxy thiol and amino
alcohol functionalities, respectively, with net retention
of configurations at both carbinol carbons. The sulfur or
nitrogen in these rearrangements is still directed at C-2
to produce, after suitable deprotections, syn-R-sufhydryl
(or amino)-â-hydroxy esters.11
This leaves the â-hydroxyl-selective functionalizations
of syn-2,3-dihydroxy esters a very much undeveloped
area. A rare case of â-hydroxyl-selective acylation has
been reported in acidic hydrolysis of the cyclic ortho
esters.12
In addition to the regioselection, the inability of the
AD process to produce anti diols means that the question
of diastereochemical diversity (syn/anti) is always an
important issue in this field.13
We postulated that while the electron-withdrawing
inductive effect of the ester group made the R-hydroxyl
group more acidic in 2,3-dihydroxy esters, the same effect
would make the nonbonding electrons of the â-hydroxyl
oxygen more nucleophilic. Therefore, under suitable
reaction conditions in which the hydroxyls are not even
partially deprotonated, electrophiles would react selec-
tively with the â-hydroxyl group. A similar case of
unequal nucleophilicities is well-known in amino acid
chemistry where R-amino groups are far less reactive
than ω-amino groups.14 Of the various alcohol chemistries
usually performed under nonbasic reaction conditions,
Mitsunobu reactions seemed paticularly interesting to
investigate as they would offer a means of addressing
not only regiodiversity but also diastereodiversity issues
as well (vide infra).15
Un u su a l Regioselection in th e Mitsu n obu
Rea ction s of syn -2,3-Dih yd r oxy Ester s:
Syn th esis of Sta tin e a n d Its Dia ster eom er
Soo Y. Ko
Department of Chemistry and Division of Molecular and
Life Sciences, Ewha Womans University,
Seoul 120-750, Korea
sooyko@mm.ewha.ac.kr
Received J uly 27, 2001
Abstr a ct: Mitsunobu reactions of syn-2,3-dihydroxy esters
exhibit a complete regioselection for the â-hydroxyl group.
Benzoylation, azidation, and tosylation have been performed
under these conditions. â-Functionalizations of syn-2,3-
dihydroxy esters are uncommon, and the Mitsunobu reac-
tions are complementary to other diol chemistries in the
regioselection. In addition, the configurational inversion
accompanying the Mitsunobu protocol offers a means for
diastereochemical diversity, as exemplified by a synthesis
of statine and its anti diastereomer. These findings will
further expand the synthetic utilities of the Sharpless AD
process.
The advent of the Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxyla-
tion (AD) process has provided easy access to enantiopure
vicinal-diols.1 Selective transformations of diols further
expand the synthetic utilities of the AD. Their discover-
ies, therefore, are much sought after. Of various AD
products, syn-2,3-dihydroxy esters are the most common,
perhaps because reliable methods exist for the construc-
tion of the substrates, (E)-R,â-unsaturated esters, with
their geometry being well established.2 As for selective
transformations of AD products, syn-2,3-dihydroxy esters
again provide a fertile ground as the presence of the ester
group renders some of the alcohol chemistry regioselec-
tive.
Most of the previous works in this area result in
regioselective reactions at the R-hydroxyl group of syn-
2,3-dihydroxy esters, employing one of the following two
strategies. One approach takes advantage of the higher
acidity of the R-hydroxyl group (induced by the adjacent
ester group).3 Under basic reaction conditions, the more
acidic R-hydroxyl group gets selectively deprotonated
(if only partially), and the resulting R-alkoxide (or
R-Oδ-‚‚‚‚Hδ+) regioselectively reacts with electrophiles.
Sulfonylations (RSO2Cl with pyridine or Et3N) have been
reported to produce a complete regioselection for the
R-hydroxyl group. The monosulfonates thus produced are
useful intermediates for synthesis of various compounds
with the general structure of anti-R-Nu-â-hydroxy esters.4
In the second approach, both hydroxyls are activated,
usually in the form of cyclic intermediates; then, only one
Using the crotonate ester diol 1 as a model substrate
devoid of any strong steric bias, we performed Mitsunobu
reactions with triphenylphosphine-DEAD in the presence
(5) (a) Gao, Y.; Sharpless, K. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7538.
(b) Lohray, B. B. Synthesis 1992, 1035. (c) Byun, H. S.; He, L.; Bittman,
R. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7051.
(6) (a) Gao, Y.; Zepp, C. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 3155.
(7) (a) Kang, S. K.; Park, H. S.; Rho, H. S.; Yoon, S. H.; Shin, J . S.
J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 3513. (b) Chang, H.-T.; Sharpless,
K. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3219.
(8) Ko, S. Y. J . Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 6250.
(9) (a) Kolb, H. C.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 10515.
(b) Golding, B. T.; Hall, D. R.; Sakriker, S. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1973, 1214.
(10) Cho, G. Y.; Ko, S. Y. J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 8745.
(11) cf.: (a) Cho, G. Y.; Park, J . N.; Ko, S. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 1789. (b) Park, J . N.; Ko, S. Y.; Koh, H. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 5553. (c) Cho, G. Y.; An, K. M.; Ko, S. Y. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.
2001, 22, 432.
(12) Oikawa, M.; Wada, A.; Okazaki, F.; Kusumoto, S. J . Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 4469.
(13) cf.: (a) Wang, L.; Sharpless, K. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
7568. (b) Ko, S. Y.; Malik, M.; Dickinson, A. F. J . Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 2570.
(14) Bodanszky, M. Principles of Peptide Synthesis; Springer-Ver-
lag: Berlin, 1984.
(15) (a) Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1. (b) Hughes, D. L. Organic
Reactions; J ohn Wiley & Sons: New York, 1992; Vol. 42, pp 235-657.
(1) Review: Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B.
Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2483.
(2) (a) Wadsworth, W. S. Org. React. 1992, 25, 73. (b) Beatmann,
H. J .; Vostrowsky, O. Top. Curr. Chem. 1983, 109, 85.
(3) Fleming, P. R.; Sharpless, K. B. J . Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2869.
(4) (a) Hoffman, R. V. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 1109. (b) Hoffman, R.
V.; Kim, H. O. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 3007. (c) Rao, A. V. R.; Rao, S.
P.; Bhanu, M. N. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 859.
10.1021/jo015967f CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/22/2002