Published on Web 10/06/2007
1,4,5,8,9,12-Hexamethyltriphenylene. A Molecule with a
Flipping Twist
Yi Wang, Andrew D Stretton, Mark C McConnell, Peter A. Wood, Simon Parsons,
John B Henry, Andrew R Mount,* and Trent H Galow*
Contribution from the School of Chemistry, UniVersity of Edinburgh, The King’s Buildings,
West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, U.K.
Received June 6, 2007; E-mail: trent.galow@ed.ac.uk
Abstract: The synthesis and characterization of 1,4,5,8,9,12-hexamethyltriphenylene (5) is described. In
the solid state, X-ray crystallographic studies reveal that compound 5 presents a highly distorted C2 geometry
with a 53° end-to-end twist. In solution, variable-temperature 1H NMR studies and molecular modeling
present a story of rapid dynamic conformational interconversions between two C2 enantiomers (with a low
activation barrier) and a slower C2-D3 interconversion (with a relatively high barrier)sthe first time clear
evidence of conformational interchange for these hindered triphenylenes has been provided. Further studies
have established that 5 is a fluorescent stable blue emitter, and that the compound undergoes an irreversible
one-electron electrochemical oxidation. Calculations have predicted this to be a radical cation of C2 geometry
with 60° end-to-end twist.
Molecules that present functional groups in an atypical
fashion, for example distorted from their preferred geometry,
are intriguing targets for synthesis. Examples of systems
previously examined include twisted amides1 and nitro substit-
uents2 and the highly distorted aromatic rings found in several
triphenylenes, naphthalenes, and pentacene cores.3-7 These
systems are inherently higher in energy than their non-strained
cousins and can be far more reactivesthe reactivity being driven
by release of steric strain.1,4 Overcrowded “D3h”-symmetric8
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) can adopt either a
C2 or D3 (propeller-like) conformation.9 The C2 versus D3
question is part of a wider issue regarding the driving forces
underlying the conformational preference, i.e., sterics versus
electronics, and considerable effort has been devoted toward
resolving this point. Triphenylenes are a family that fit under
the “D3h” umbrella. Currently, only the moderately twisted
peraryloxytriphenylene 1b10 and perfluorotriphenylene (2)3,6 and
the highly twisted perchlorotriphenylene (3)4,5b have been
studied crystallographically, while aryloxy compounds 1a,c and
perbicyclo[2.2.2]octenetriphenylene (4)11 have been synthesized
but not characterized by X-ray.12 However, Pascal et al. have
suggested that halogen substituents may themselves have
significant electronic effects which affect the structural char-
acteristics.9 As a result, they concluded that “the presently
available experimental structures are perhaps not the very best
examples for an examination of the C2/D3 dichotomy”. They
suggested and modeled four “ideal” candidates,13,14 one of which
was 1,4,5,8,9,12-hexamethyltriphenylene (5). They predicted
that 5 would adopt a C2 conformation, as opposed to D3, with
the C2 system being computationally more stable by >7 kcal/
mol. Therefore, the experimental realization of 5 would
provide a model system for investigating many of the key issues,
including conformational interconversionssan almost uncharted
area of knowledge for these hindered triphenylenes. We report
here the synthesis and complete characterization of compound
5. This characterization includes X-ray crystallography, variable-
temperature NMR (VT-NMR), molecular modeling, fluores-
cence spectroscopy, and cyclic voltammetry (CV).
(1) Tani, K.; Stoltz, B. M. Nature 2006, 441, 731-734.
(2) Hiyama, Y.; Brown, T. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 1698-1700.
(3) Hursthouse, M. B.; Smith, V. B.; Massey, A. G. J. Fluor. Chem. 1977, 10,
145-156.
(4) Shibata, K.; Kulkarni, A. A.; Ho, D. M.; Pascal, R. A., Jr. J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 428-434.
(10) Frampton, C. S.; MacNicol, D. D.; Rowan, S. J. J. Mol. Struct. 1997, 405,
169-178.
(11) Nishinaga, T.; Inoue, R.; Matsuura, A.; Komatsu, K. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
1435-1438.
(5) (a) Pascal, R. A., Jr. Chem. ReV. 2006, 106, 4809-4819. (b) Shibata, K.;
Kulkarni, A. A.; Ho, D. M.; Pascal, R. A., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 5983-5984.
(6) Smith, V. B.; Massey, A. G. Tetrahedron 1969, 25, 5495-5501.
(7) (a) Lu, J.; Ho, D. M.; Vogelaar, N. J.; Kraml, C. M.; Pascal, R. A., Jr. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11168-11169. (b) Niemz, A.; Rotello, V. M.
Chem. ReV. 1999, 32, 44-52. (c) Kroto, H. W. Recent Res. DeV. Appl.
Phys. 2002, 5, 409-436. (d) Watson, M. D.; Fechtenko¨tter, A.; Mu¨llen,
K. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 1267-1300. (e) Wu, Y-T.; Siegel, J. S. Chem.
ReV. 2006, 106, 4843-4867. (f) Tsefrikas, V. M.; Scott, L. T. Chem. ReV.
2006, 106, 4868-4884.
(12) (a) Factual end-to-end twists: 1b, 45.2°; 2, 40.2°; 3, 56.6°. Predicted
(computed) twists: 4, 61°; unsubstituted triphenylene, 2°. (b) A 1:1 co-
crystal of perfluoro 2 and triphenylene gives corresponding twists of 33°
and 16°. Weck, M.; Dunn, A. R.; Matsumoto, K.; Coates, G. W.;
Lobkovsky, E. B.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2741-
2745.
(13) The experimental structures investigated were hexabenzotriphenylene,
decacyclene, a hexa-tert-butyldecacyclene, perfluorotriphenylene (1), and
perchlorotriphenylene (2). The three remaining theoretical structures
examined, to the best of our knowledge, have not been synthesized. These
are a hexamethyldecacyclene and two isomeric hexafurotriphenylenes.
(14) Pen˜a, D.; Pe´rez, D.; Guitia´n, E.; Castedo, L. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 7,
1238-1243.
(8) The D3h symmetry is related to how molecules are drawn on paper. Often,
these structures are drawn without “wedged bonds”, which is indicative of
“D3h” symmetrysthis can be misleading.
(9) Barnett, L.; Ho, D. M.; Baldridge, K. K.; Pascal, R. A., Jr. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 727-733.
9
10.1021/ja074120j CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2007, 129, 13193-13200
13193