preparation of various 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles 18, 21–22
and 36–37 was successful using the copper(I)-catalyzed ligation of
azide 31 and their respective alkynes according to the click
chemistry concept approach.17 Subsequent Boc deprotection or
saponification afforded the racemic derivatives 19 or 20.
The inhibition assay of a-2,3-ST was done as described by
Schmidt15 using CMP-Neu5Ac as a substrate and the modified
disaccharide16 with a 4,5-dimethoxy-2-nitrobenzyl group as a UV-
labelled acceptor (Scheme 3). To enhance the potency in compound
2, we initially prepared four derivatives 4–5 and 27–28 with alterna-
tions of the succinyl ester unit. However, efforts to improve the IC50
were unsuccessful, for example, replacement of the succinyl moiety
of 2 with aspartyl, phosphate, Tyr, or Lys either reduced inhibitory
activity (IC50 > 350 mM for 4–5) or gave a product displaying no
biological functions (27–28) toward a-2,3-ST (Table 1). In addition,
a minor influence on the inhibitory property (IC50 = 450 mM for 6)
of the a isomer of 2 has been observed, suggesting negligible
interaction in the recognition of epiandrosterone/androsterone
analogues with succinyl-stereochemistry by the enzyme.
Scheme 2 (a) MeOH, Amberlite IR120, 80 uC, 12 h; (b) LAH, THF,
0 uC A r.t., 10 min; (c) DPPA, DBU, THF, r.t., 10 h; (d)NaN3, TBAI, 15-
crown-5, 110 uC, 15 h; (e) HBTU, DIPEA, H-Gly-OBut?HCl or L-Asp,
N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), r.t., 30 min; (f) TFA, DCM, r.t., 1 h; (g)
succinic anhydride, DMAP, pyridine, 80 uC, 15 h; (h) TFA, 2% H2O, r.t.,
1 h; (i) succinic anhydride, DMAP, pyridine, 60 uC, 15 h; (j) CrO3, acetic
acid, 100 uC, 30 min; (k) acetic anhydride, pyridine, r.t., 5 h; (l) t-BuOH,
DMAP, DCC, DCM, r.t., 30 min; (m) NaOCH3, MeOH, r.t., 2 h; (n)
Fmoc-L-Asp(OBut)-OH, DMAP, DCC, DCM, r.t., 30 min; (o) DBU,
DCM, r.t., 1 h; (p) Fmoc-D-Asp(OBut)-OH, DMAP, DCC, DCM, r.t.,
30 min; (q) alkyne, CuSO4?5H2O, sodium ascorbate, THF/H2O (1 : 1), r.t.,
8 h; (r) NaOH, EtOH/H2O (1 : 1), r.t., 5 h.
Lithocholic acid (3), which potentially mimics a pentacyclic ring
of 1 (Fig. 1), showed a promising inhibition constant (IC50
=
21 mM), indicating an acceptable pharmacophore. Among the 16
synthetic analogues (Table 1), the terminal alcohol 7 and its
derivative 8 displayed a 5–17-fold decrease over 3, suggesting that
a carboxylic acid group is important for promoting affinity. This
was further confirmed by utilizing the method of peptide coupling
to extend the terminal carboxylic acid; the inhibitory properties of
compounds 9 and 10 can be restored completely compared to
those of 7–8. To determine the importance of the 3-hydroxyl
position of 3, the inhibition of a-2,3-ST activity by compound 11,
which has a ketone moiety in place of a hydroxyl group, was
evaluated. Compound 11 was found to have an IC50 of 139 mM,
representing 7-fold lower potency than 3. Furthermore, com-
pounds 12 and 13 exhibited a 2-fold potency increase over 3,
indicating that construction of the 3-hydroxyl portion of 3 is
tunable to the interaction of binding affinity. When the terminal
carboxylic acid of 12 was varied, the analogues 14–16 appeared to
reach a low micromolar affinity plateau (Table 1). Surprisingly,
replacement of the D-Asp with L-Asp, as in 17, gave a 2-fold
improvement in potency over 13. In addition, compound 3 was
further optimized by replacing the carboxylic acid with a 1,4-
disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole ligand using the click chemistry
approach. Compounds 20 and 21 showed an 8–12-fold potency
increase over 19, suggesting that adding the positively charged
amino group could abolish affinity. The primary alcohol 18 was at
least 10-fold less potent than 21 and 20-fold less potent than 22.
bromotrimethylsilane.13 Coupling of succinic anhydride to andros-
terone in the presence of 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP) and
pyridine produced the desired isomer 6.
In addition, Scheme 2 illustrates the synthesis of lithocholic acid
analogues 7–22. Compound 3 was treated with Amberlite IR120 in
anhydrous methanol, and reduction of the resulting methyl
ester gave the alcohol 7. The hydroxyl group of 7 was converted
to a diphenylphosphate group of 8 in the presence of diphenyl
phosphorylazide (DPPA) and DBU. Condensation of
3
and the corresponding protected amino acids, H-Gly-OBut and
L-H-Asp(OBut)-OBut, using 2-(1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetra-
methyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HBTU)/diisopropylethyl-
amine (DIPEA) as coupling agent furnished the protected
conjugates 32–33. Compounds 9–10 were obtained after removal
of the remaining tBu groups. Analogues 15–16 were prepared by
the esterification of 32–33 and succinic anhydride in a manner
similar to 6. Oxidation of 3 with CrO3 in acidic conditions produced
11 in 70% yield. Compound 12 was synthesized in a manner similar
to that described for 6, 15 and 16 by esterification of 3 with succinic
anhydride. In order to prepare analogues 13–14 and 17, the
hydroxyl group of 3 was transformed to an acetyl group, and
subsequent esterification gave 34. Intermediate 35, derived from 34
by deacylation, was converted to the desired product 13 by
dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC)-promoted coupling followed by
deprotection of the Fmoc, Boc and tBu groups. Esterification of the
secondary alcohol 35 gave compound 14. The D-form amino acid–
lithocholic acid conjugate 17 was synthesized in a manner similar to
that described for 13. The 1,2,3-triazoles 18–22 required first the
synthesis of the terminal azide 31 (Scheme 2). The conversion of
diphenylphosphate 8 to the corresponding azide 31 was achieved in
the presence of excess sodium azide (NaN3), a catalytic amount of
tetrabutylammonium iodide (TBAI), and 15-crown-5.14 Reliable
Scheme 3 a-2,3-ST catalyzed sialylation of acceptor.
630 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 629–631
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006