5700 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 36, No. 25, 1997
Gabba¨ı et al.
of Gaussian-type orbitals density functional (LCGTO-DF) method.15,16
The local spin density approximation (LSDA) for the exchange-
correlation functional17 was applied during the self-consistency cycles.
This model functional often overestimates ligand binding energies, yet
it is known to yield accurate geometry and vibrational data.18 We
refrained from using a more accurate, yet computationally more
demanding gradient-corrected functional since in the discussion of
energetic aspects we are mainly interested in a comparison of trends.
The Gaussian-type molecular orbital basis sets for the atoms Au, P,
O, and H were taken as in previous investigations on other gold
compounds.19,20 Listing the number of exponents of the uncontracted
bases in parentheses and the size of the contracted ones in brackets,
the basis sets used are as follows: Au(21s,17p,11d,7f) f [11s,10p,-
7d,3f], P(12s,9p,1d) f [5s,4p,1d], O(9s,5p,1d) f [4s,3p,1d], and
H(6s,1p) f [4s,1p]. Basis sets of comparable quality were chosen for
In, I, and Cl: In(18s,14p,8d) f [7s,5p,4d],21,22 I(17s,14p,8d) f
[7s,5p,4d],22 and Cl(12s,9p,1d) f [5s,4p,1d].23,24 These atomic basis
sets were contracted in a generalized fashion using atomic LDA
eigenvectors. The charge density and the exchange-correlation potential
were represented by auxiliary Gaussian-type basis sets.15 The corre-
sponding s- and d(r2)-type functions were generated in a standard
fashion.15 For the heavier atoms, Au, In, I, and Cl, only every second
d(r2)-type function was used. In addition, a set of three p-type and
three d-type polarization exponents was employed for each atomic
center, except for O and H, where only p-type polarization functions
were taken into account. The p-exponents were 0.1, 0.4375, and 1.562;
the d-exponents are scaled by a factor of 2. The auxiliary basis sets
were left uncontracted.
The theoretical treatment of large heavy-metal clusters is a
challenging task, but it has been demonstrated that calculations
on suitable models of reduced complexity make the problems
tractable, yet also lead to meaningful fundamental conclu-
sions.13,14 This strategy has also been successfully used in the
present study by introducing simple pseudoligands with frontier
orbital characteristics and electron counts similar to those of
the ligands in the synthesized systems.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. General Procedures. All experiments were carried out under
an atmosphere of dry, purified nitrogen. Glassware was dried and filled
with nitrogen, and solvents were distilled and kept under nitrogen.
NMR: Jeol GX 400; TMS and 85% aqueous H3PO4 as external
standards for 1H and 31P NMR, respectively. MS: Finnigan MAT 90.
Microanalyses: In-house analyzers (by combustion). InBr was prepared
by melting together 2 equiv of indium powder with 1 equiv of InBr3
under vacuum at 375 °C and purified through sublimation under the
same conditions. Ph3PAuBr was prepared by the reaction of NaBr with
Ph3PAuCl in the two-phase system CHCl3/H2O and purified by
recrystallization from a CHCl3/hexane solution.
2.2. Preparation of [(dppe)2Au]+[(dppe)2Au3In3Br7(thf)]- (2).
InBr (0.10 g, 0.51 mmol), Ph3PAuBr (0.27 g, 0.5 mmol), and dppe
(0.20 g, 0.5 mmol) were mixed as solids and cooled to -78 °C. Thf
(5 mL) was then added to the mixture. With stirring, the reaction
mixture was allowed to reach room temperature, during which time a
yellowish precipitate had formed. After 3 h at 20 °C the precipitate
was isolated through filtration. Addition of CH2Cl2 (5 mL) to the
precipitate followed by filtration yielded an orange solution. A layer
of hexane (5 mL) was slowly allowed to diffuse into this CH2Cl2
solution at -25 °C, which resulted in the precipitation of 0.10 g (24%
yield based on gold) of an orange crystalline compound 2 (mp 105° C
dec). Elemental anal. for C108H104Au4Br7In3OP8. Calcd: C, 38.6; H,
3.1. Found: C, 38.0; H, 3.4. 31P NMR {1H} (109.3 MHz) δ (ppm):
18.0 (4P, [(dppe)2Au]+), 31.3 (2P), 56.3 (2P, [(dppe)2Au3In3Br7(thf)]-).
1H NMR (399.8 MHz) δ (ppm): 1.76, 3.54 (br, 8H, thf); 2.43 (br, 8H,
CH2-[(dppe)2Au]+), 3.10 (4H), 3.42 (4H, br, CH2-[(dppe)2Au3In3Br7-
(thf)]-), 6.96-7.67 and 8.05 (m, 80H, Ph-CH). MS (FAB): m/z 993
([(dppe)2Au]+, 100).
3. Preparation and Properties of a Novel Anionic
Gold/Indium Cluster Complex
Preliminary work has shown that insertion of indium(I)
halides [InX] into the Au-X bonds of gold(I) halide complexes
[LAuX] can give ready access to mixed-metal mixed-valent Au/
In cluster species.11 Thus treatment of [InCl] with [Ph3PAuCl]
in the presence of [Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2] (dppe) in tetrahydrofuran
(thf) affords the cluster [(dppe)2Au3In3Cl6(thf)3], 1 (eq 1). In
3[(Ph3P)AuCl] + 3[InCl] + 2[dppe] + 3[thf] f
2.3. X-ray Crystallography. A specimen of suitable quality and
size (0.1 × 0.25 × 0.40 mm) was mounted in a glass capillary and
used for measurements of precise cell constants and intensity data
collection. Diffraction measurements were made on an Enraf-Nonius
CAD-4 diffractometer using graphite-monochromated Mo KR radiation
(λ ) 0.710 73 Å) with the ω scan mode at -68 °C. An Lp correction
was applied, and intensity data were corrected for decay (-14.1%) and
absorption effects (ψ-scans, Tmin/Tmax ) 0.449/0.999). The structure
was solved by direct methods (SHELXTL-PLUS) and completed by
full-matrix least-squares techniques (SHELXL-93).
[(dppe) Au In Cl (thf) ]
3[Ph3P] +
(1)
2
3
3
6
3
1
attempts to prepare the analogous bromide compound, we now
reacted [InBr] with [Ph3PAuBr] and [dppe] in approximately
equimolar quantities in thf at -78 °C. A yellow precipitate
formed, which could be crystallized from dichloromethane/
hexane at -25 °C (24% yield of orange crystals, mp 105 °C
dec). Solutions in CD2Cl2 show three resonances of the relative
intensities 4:2:2 in the 31P{1H} NMR spectrum (δ ) 18.0, 31.3,
and 56.3 ppm). In the 1H NMR spectra there are the multiplet
signals for metal-coordinated [thf] at δ ) 1.76 and 3.54 ppm
and broad resonances for three types of CH2 groups at δ )
2.43 (8H), 3.10 (4H), and 3.42 ppm (4H), complemented by an
extended multiplet of aryl resonances δ ) 6.96-8.05 ppm (m,
80H). In FAB mass spectra the prominent peak for m/z ) 993
C108H104Au4Br7In3OP8: M ) 3357.37, monoclinic, a ) 12.681(1)
Å, b ) 20.139(1) Å, c ) 44.182(4) Å, â ) 91.06(1)°, space group
P21/c (No. 14), Z ) 4, Dc ) 1.977 g cm-3, F(000) ) 6352 e, µ(Mo
KR) ) 84.2 cm-1; 16 424 intensity data were measured up to (sin
θ/λ)max ) 0.59 Å-1, of which 16 349 independent structure factors were
used for refinement. All non-H atoms were refined with anisotropic
displacement parameters. All H atoms were placed in idealized
calculated positions and allowed to ride on their carbon atoms with
fixed isotropic contributions [U(iso)fix ) 1.5Ueq(C) for all methylene and
2
0.08 for all phenyl H atoms]. The function minimized was {[Σw(Fo
(15) Dunlap, B. I.; Ro¨sch, N. AdV. Quantum Chem. 1990, 21, 317.
(16) Ro¨sch, N.; Kru¨ger, S.; Mayer, M.; Nasluzov, V. A. In Recent
DeVelopments and Applications of Modern Density Functional Theory;
Seminario, J. M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1996; p 497.
(17) Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200.
(18) Ziegler, T. Chem. ReV. 1991, 91, 651.
(19) Ha¨berlen, O. D.; Ro¨sch, N. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 4970.
(20) Chung, S.-C.; Kru¨ger, S.; Schmidbaur, H.; Ro¨sch, N. Inorg. Chem.
1996, 35, 5387.
2
2
2
- Fc2)2]/Σ[w(Fo )2]}1/2, with w ) 1/σ2(Fo )+(ap)2 + (bp), p ) (Fo
+
2Fc2)/3, and a ) 0.0855, b ) 241.16. The final Rw and R1 [based on
Σ(||Fo| - |Fc||)/Σ|Fo|] were 0.1621 and 0.0665, respectively, for 988
refined parameters.
2.4. Computational Details. Calculations were performed in an
all-electron fashion by means of the scalar relativistic linear combination
(12) Go¨rling, A.; Ro¨sch, N.; Ellis, D. E.; Schmidbaur, H. Inorg. Chem.
1991, 30, 3986.
(13) Ha¨berlen, O. D.; Schmidbaur, H.; Ro¨sch, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 8241.
(14) Ro¨sch, N.; Go¨rling, A.; Ellis, D. E.; Schmidbaur, H. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 1357.
(21) Huzinaga, S. J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 71, 1980.
(22) Poirier, R.; Kari, R.; Cszimadia, I. G. Handbook of Gaussian Basis
Sets; Elsevier: New York, 1985.
(23) Veillard, A. Theor. Chim. Acta 1968, 12, 405.
(24) Huzinaga, S. Gaussian Basis Sets for Molecular Calculations;
Elsevier: New York, 1984.