36
J. Reis et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1056–1057 (2014) 31–37
The unequivocal assignment of C-10 at 134.98 ppm was also per-
formed by HMBC. The long range correlation between H-3 and
the carbon at 155.38 ppm led to its identification as C-9. The two
signals at d = 7.68 and 7.22 ppm present on the 1H NMR were
attributed to the exocyclic ring protons H-20/H60 and H-30/H-50,
respectively, in accordance with their multiplicity, integration
and the long range interaction (Table 1). The HSQC experiments
provide assignment of the carbons: the signal at 121.02 was attrib-
uted to the equivalent carbons C-20/C-60 and the signal at
129.04 ppm to the carbons C-30/C-50.
The structural characterization of chromone carboxamide 5
(Scheme 1) was performed using the same NMR techniques that al-
low the assignment of the protons and carbons of the chromone
carboxamide structure (2, 3, 4, 4a, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8a and 9). The major
differences found in the 1D and 2D NMR data of chromones 4
and 5 are in accordance with their structures. In fact, no signal cor-
responding to the CH3 function in the 1H NMR spectra of com-
pound 5 was detected. In line with this, a new multiplet appears
at d = 7.13 ppm that was ascribed to H-40. HMBC correlations allow
to assign the quaternary carbon at d = 137.99 ppm as C-40. Finally,
the analysis of the HSQC led to the conclusion that C-40 appears at a
d = 125.40 ppm.
and by one weak CAH. . .O interaction. These dipole-dipole interac-
tions are directional and can vary in strength depending on the
type of donor and acceptor involved on the interaction.
The geometric parameters for those interactions are given in
Table 4. The N2AH2ꢂ ꢂ ꢂO3 (within the selected asymmetric unit)
and the NAH at (ꢃx,y,1/2 ꢃ z) act as hydrogen donors to the water
molecule at (0, y, 1/4) which in turn acts as hydrogen donor via
O3AH3ꢂ ꢂ ꢂO4 (x,1 + y,z) and via the water generated by the two-
fold axis at (0,y,0.1/4), on which the water atom sits, to O4 at
(ꢃx,1 + y,½ + z), Fig. 2. This forms a sandwich type chain structure
which runs parallel to the b-axis, Fig. 3. Adjacent chains are linked
by a weak CAH(methyl) interaction to atom O2 at (ꢃx + 1/2, y + 1/
2, ꢃz + 1/2), Fig. 3.
This structure is reinforced by the weak C213AH213ꢂ ꢂ ꢂO2 (x,
1 + y, z) interaction. Within this chain the pyran rings of the 2-fold
related molecules are
p. . .p stacked above each other with a cen-
troid to centroid distance of 3.872(3)Å, a perpendicular distance
between of 3.5074(10)Å and a slippage of 1.640 Å, Fig. 2.
In 4, which is not hydrated, the molecules are linked into chains
by a hydrogen bond between the amino H and the 4-oxo oxygen
atom reinforced by weak CAH. . .O interactions. CAH. . .
. . . stacking are also present, [23].
p and
p
p
3.4. X-ray structural characterization
4. Conclusion
3.4.1. Molecular dimensions and conformation
The chromone 2-carboxamide derivatives 4 and 5 were ob-
tained in moderate to high yields by either classic or microwave
reactions.
Compound 5 crystallized in the monoclinic space group C2/c as
a hemihydrate. The crystallization was carried out in methanol.
The ORTEP diagram for 5 together with the adopted numbering
scheme is shown in Fig. 1. The X-ray structure of 4 has been al-
ready published [23] and the data will be only used for compara-
tive discussion purpose. The molecule is made up of two
aromatic rings, a chromone ring and a benzyl ring connected by
an amide residue. The bond lengths between atoms of the amide
residue are within the average values obtained for phenylamides
[23].
The configuration of the molecule is thus given by the CAN rot-
amer of the amide that defines the position of the aromatic rings
with respect to one other: the molecule shows an anti-rotamer
configuration in which the oxygen atom of the amide is trans re-
lated with oxygen atom O2 of the chromone ring, allowing for
the establishment of an intramolecular hydrogen bond,
N2AH2ꢂ ꢂ ꢂO1 (geometric parameters given in Table 4), forming a
S(5) pseudo-ring [24]. The nitrogen atom N2 also acts as a donor
to the oxygen atom O3 of the water molecule linking the crystalli-
zation solvent to the chromone. In addition, there is a weak hydro-
gen bond linking the benzyl ring with the carboxamide O2 atom,
C(ortho)AHꢂ ꢂ ꢂO2 forming a pseudo S6 ring [24]. Compound 4 also
exhibits an intramolecular hydrogen bond between N2 and O1 as
well as the C216AH216ꢂ ꢂ ꢂO2 weak contact [23].
The combination of 1D, 2D and EIRS NMR techniques allowed
for full NMR 1H and 13C signal assignments. The compounds were
also characterized by Infrared spectroscopy and XRD.
The X-ray analysis shows the interplay between intramolecular
hydrogen and intermolecular hydrogen bonding in the molecular
conformation, factors which may influence drug effectiveness.
The data acquired from this study make a valuable addition to
our chromone database which will help the unambiguous identifi-
cation of the compounds in our arsenal of chromone compounds
thus providing a better understanding of the structure–activity
relationships of these compounds.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Foundation for Science and Technology
(FCT), Portugal (PTDC/QUI-QUI/113687/2009 and Pest/C-QUI/
UI0081/2011) and the grant of A. Gaspar (SFRH/BD/43531/2008).
Thanks are due to the staff at the National Crystallographic Service,
University of Southampton for the data collection, help and advice
[25].
References
The dihedral angle between the best planes of the chromone
and the benzyl ring for 5 is 3.71(10)° but the clockwise torsions
of the aromatic rings around the N2AC211 and C2AC21 axis, for
the benzyl and the chromone rings respectively, are significantly
higher [the C3AC2AC21AO2 and the C21AN2AC211AC216 tor-
sion angles are of ꢃ11.9(4) and 11.5(4)°, respectively] showing that
the rings are not co-planar but they lie on nearly parallel planes.
Compound 5 is more planar than compound 4, in which the dihe-
dral angle between mean planes made between the chromone and
the benzyl ring atoms is 11.05(5)°.
3.4.2. Supramolecular structure
Considering the type of the donor/acceptor pair as well as the
direction of the interaction [21], [26–27], it can be considered that
the supramolecular structure of compound 5 is governed by two
strong classical OAH. . .O, NAH. . .O hydrogen bond interactions