958
S. Tekkam, J. L. Johnson, S. C. Jonnalagadda, and V. R. Mereddy
Vol 50
8.05 (br s, 1H), 7.78–7.76 (m, 2H), 7.46–7.27 (m, 8H), 5.93 (s,
1H), 5.73 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.46 (s, 1H), 5.41 (d, J = 12.0 Hz,
1H), 5.33 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.75 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.64
(d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 1.22 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C-NMR
(125 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 170.0, 165.8, 165.6, 141.9, 134.9,
133.6, 130.1, 130.0, 129.4, 129.0, 128.8, 128.6, 121.5, 74.7,
73.7, 71.8, 68.6, 15.8.
cancer cell lines (RPMI-8226). Briefly, the cancer cells were
plated in 96 well plates and allowed to adhere for 3d. Cells
were then treated with each compound (50 mM) or with
DMSO alone for 24 h. MTS assay was used for determining
the number of remaining viable cells after exposure to com-
pounds. MTS (20 mL) was added to 100 mL culture medium
in each well. After incubation at 37ꢀC for 3 h, absorbance
was measured using an ELISA plate reader. Unfortunately,
none of the compounds showed any appreciable cytotoxicity
at this concentration. We believe that further studies are
required to understand the structure activity relationship to
identify a lead molecule.
Representative procedure for the preparation of hydroxy
acid: valine a-methylene-b-hydroxy lactam acid 12a.
To a
solution of the hydroxy lactam 11a (0.66 mmol) dissolved in
5 mL CH3OH was added the aqueous LiOH (0.1 N, 5 mL) and
stirred for 48 h at RT. It was then acidified with 2 M HCl and
concentrated in vacuo. The crude product obtained was purified
by column chromatography (MeOH/CHCl3, 1:9) to obtain acid
12a (79% yield). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 8.44 (s,
1H), 5.81 (s, 1H), 5.47 (s, 1H), 4.49 (s, 1H), 2.29 (m, 1H), 0.87
(d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.70 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C-NMR
(125 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 172.9, 168.8, 145.5, 117.7, 72.9,
72.5, 33.5, 18.9, 16.7; ESI–MS: m/z 222 (M + Na+) for
C9H13NO4Na.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, we have developed a concise protocol for
the synthesis of a-methylene-b-hydroxy-g-carboxy-g-lac-
tams via iminoester alkylation followed by allylic hydroxyl-
ation with selenium dioxide. All the compounds synthesized
were evaluated for their cytotoxity against multiple myeloma
cancer cell lines. Owing to the importance of pyroglutamates
in organic and medicinal chemistry, we anticipate this meth-
odology to be useful for the synthetic community.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
[1] (a) Najera, C.; Yus, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999,
10, 2245; (b) Smith, M. B. Alkaloids: Chem Biol Perspect 1998,
12, 229.
[2] (c) Rigo, B.; Cauliez, P.; Fasseur, D.; Sauvage, F.-X. Trends
Heterocycl Chem 1991, 2, 155; (d) Poulsen, T. B.; Dickmeiss, G.; Over-
gaard, J.; Jørgensen K. A. Angew Chem Int Ed 2008, 47, 4687; (e) Schmidt,
C.; Kazmaier, U. Org Biomol Chem 2008, 6, 4643; (f) Buller, M. J.; Gilley,
C. B.; Nguyen, B.; Olshansky, L.; Fraga, B.; Kobayashi, Y. Synlett
2008, 2244; (g) Gilley, C. B.; Buller, M. J.; Kobayashi, Y. Synlett 2008,
2249; (h) Sun, P-P.; Chang, M-Y.; Chiang, M. Y.; Chang, N. C. Org Lett
2003, 5, 1761.
[3] (a) Chauhan, D.; Catley, L.; Li, G.; Podar, K.; Hideshima, T.;
Velanmkar, M.; Mitisades, C.; Mitsiades, N.; Yasui, H.; Letai, A.;
Ovaa, H.; Berkers, C.; Nicholson, B.; Chao, T.H.; Neuteboom, S. T.
C.; Richardson, P.; Palladino, M. A.; Anderson, K. C. Cancer Cell
2005, 8,407; (b) Voorhees, P. M.; Orlowski, R. Z. Annu Rev Pharma-
col Toxicol 2006. 46,189; (c) Borissenko, L.; Groll, M. Chem Rev
2007, 107, 687.
EXPERIMENTAL
General methods. All operations were carried out under an
inert nitrogen atmosphere. THF, CH2Cl2, toluene, and ethyl
acetate were purchased as anhydrous solvents and used as such.
The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were plotted on a Varian
Gemini-500 spectrometer (Agilent Varian, Santa Clara, CA).
High resolution mass spectra were recorded using a Bruker
BioTOF II ESI mass spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA).
Representative procedure for allylic hydroxylation: a-
methylene-b-hydroxy-g-carboxy-g-lactam
11a.
SeO2
(18.53 mmol) was added to the valine lactam 10a (26.46 mmol)
dissolved in glacial acetic acid (80 mL) and heated to reflux for
1 h. The reaction mixture was filtered, added with water
(150 mL), and neutralized with solid NaHCO3. The neutralized
solution was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 Â 50 mL) and
evaporated in vacuo to obtain a dark yellow color residue. This
residue was dissolved in THF (50 mL), added with H2O2
(30 mL), and stirred for 2 h at RT. The reaction mass was again
extracted with ethyl acetate (3 Â 50 mL), and combined organic
extracts were washed with water (3 Â 100 mL), dried over
MgSO4, and evaporated in vacuo to obtain a yellow color
residue. Ethyl acetate (20 mL) was added and allowed to stand
at room temperature for 2 days. The solid that crystallized out
was washed with ice cold ethyl acetate to obtain pure product
11a (30% yield); 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.85 (br s,
1H), 7.33–7.25 (m, 5H), 6.04 (s, 1H), 5.65 (s, 1H), 5.21 (d,
J = 12 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (d, J = 12 Hz, 1H), 4.69 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H),
4.49 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (m, 1H), 0.78 (d, J = 7 Hz, 3H), 0.66
(d, J = 7 Hz, 3H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d 172.4, 169.4,
142.6, 135.4, 128.9, 128.8, 128.6, 121.6, 74.7, 74.0, 67.9, 34.5,
18.1, 16.0; ESI–MS: m/z 312 (M + Na+) for C16H19NO4Na.
[4] (a) Guilder, T. A. M.; Moore, B. S. Angew Chem Int Ed 2010,
49, 9346; (b) Shibasaki, M.; Kanai, M.; Fukuda, N. Chem Asian J 2007, 2,
20; (c) Stadler, M.; Bitzer, J.; Bartschmid, A. M.; Muller, H.; Buchholz, J.
B.; Gantner, F.; Tichy, H. V.; Reinemer, P.; Bacon, K. B. J. Nat Prod
2007, 70, 246; (d) Masse, C. E.; Morgan, A. J.; Adams, J.; Panek, J. S.
Eur J Org Chem 2000, 2513.
[5] (a) Clerca, J.; Grollb, M.; Illicha, D. J.; Bachmann, A. S.;
Hubere, R.; Schellenberg, B.; Dudler, R.; Kaiser, M. Proc Natl Acad
Soc 2009, 106, 6507; (b) Groll, M.; Schllenberg, B.; Archer, C. R.; Kai-
ser, M.; Dudler, R. Nature 2008, 452, 755.
[6] (a) Tekkam, S.; Alam, M. A.; Jonnalagadda, S. C.; Mereddy, V.
R. Chem Commun 2011, 3219; (b) Just, M. J.; Tekkam, S.; Alam, M. A.;
Jonnalagadda, S. C.; Johnson, J. L.; Mereddy, V. R. Tetrahedron Lett
2011, 52, 5349.
[7] (a) Basavaiah, D.; Reddy, B. S.; Badsara, S. S. Chem Rev,
2010, 110, 5447; (b) Basavaiah, D.; Rao, A. J.; Satyanarayana, T. Chem
Rev 2003; 103, 811.
[8] (a) Umbreit, M. A.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am Chem Soc, 1977, 99,
5526; (b) Coxon, J. M.; Dansted, E.; Hartshorn, M. P. Organic Synth,
1988, 6, 946.
[9] (a) Seebach, D.; Aebi, J. D. Tetrahedron Lett 1983, 24,
3311; (b) Calderari, G.; Seebach, D. Helv Chim Acta 1985, 68, 1592; (c)
Corey, E. J.; Choi, S. Tetrahedron Lett 1993, 34, 6969; (d) Becker,
M. H.; Chua, P.; Downham, R.; Douglas, C. J.; Garg, N. K.; Hiebert, S.; Jar-
och, S.; Matsuoka, R. T.; Middleton, J. A.; Ng, F. W.; Overman, L. E. J. Am
Chem Soc 2007, 129, 11987.
Threonine a-methylene-b-hydroxy lactam 17.
Procedure
1
was as described above for 11a. H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
DOI 10.1002/jhet