Soeta et al.
SCHEME 1. Copper-Chiral Phosphane-Catalyzed
Asymmetric Ethylation of Cinnamaldehyde 1a and
Its Aldimine 1b with Diethylzinc Giving 2 and 3
obtained in 55% combined yield after sodium borohydride
reduction of an aldehyde (Table 1, entry 1). We then
examined the reaction of the corresponding aldimines 1
with respect to regio- and enantioselectivity. N-Meth-
anesulfonylimine 1b15 was treated with diethylzinc under
the same catalysis conditions as the reaction of 1a,
followed by imine-hydrolysis with 10% HCl and then
sodium borohydride reduction, to give a mixture of
comparable amounts of 2 with 32% ee in 41% yield and
3b with 68% ee in 32% yield (entry 2). The source of
copper was found to be influential to the 1,4-/1,2-
selectivity as well as enantioselectivity. Copper(I) triflate
benzene complex gave the slightly improved level of
selectivity with copper(II) triflate (entry 3). Although
naphthenate,16 acetate, bromide and iodide dimethyl
sulfide complexes were 1,4-selective copper sources ex-
cepting cyanide and free iodide,17 enantioselectivity was
generally unsatisfactory (entries 4-9).
Copper(I)-L-Val-Connected Phosphane-Catalyzed
Reaction with Sterically Tuned N-Sulfonylimine.
N-Tosylimine 1c15 was also not a good acceptor to give a
mixture of 2 (16% ee) and 3c (83% ee) in a similar product
valance with 1b (Table 2, entry 1). Fortunately, aldimine
1d bearing a bulky 2,4,6-triisopropylbenzenesulfonyl
group was found to be more 1,4-selectively converted to
2 with 47% ee in 66% yield and 3d (1% ee) in 12% yield
(entry 2). We also examined the effects of copper and
amidophosphane on the reaction of 1d with diethylzinc.
Without both copper(II) triflate and phosphane 4c, the
reaction was very sluggish at 0 °C for 19 h to give 2 in
32% yield (entry 3). Without 4c the copper-catalyzed
reaction was also sluggish, at 0 °C for 20 h, giving 2 in
43% yield and 3d in 14% yield (entry 4). These two
results apparently indicated the high potentiality of a
copper-phosphane combination as a catalyst. We then
examined the effects of chiral phosphanes 4-6 on the 1,4-
selectivity and enantioselectivity of the reaction with 1d.
Unfortunately, the less bulky amidophosphane 4a18 gave
a mixture of 2 with 20% ee in 57% yield and 3d with
67% ee in 18% yield (entry 5). Interestingly, a chiral
amidophosphane 4b7c bearing two benzyl groups on a
pyrrolidine ring efficiently suppressed the 1,2-addition
of diethylzinc to 1d at 0 °C for 2 h, giving the correspond-
ing 1,4-product 2 with 57% ee in 74% yield, after
hydrolysis of an imine to an aldehyde through a short
alumina column and subsequent reduction of an aldehyde
with sodium borohydride (entry 6). It was fortunate to
find that valine-connected amidophosphanes 5 and 6 gave
the conjugate addition product 2 as the sole product.
N-Boc-L-Valine-connected amidophosphane 5a9 gave 2
with 61% ee in 77% yield (Table 2, entry 7). However,
the use of 6 bearing two benzyl groups on the pyrrolidine
ring gave 2 with a decreased 24% ee in 72% yield (entry
9). D-Valine-connected phosphane 5b was not the better
ligand, giving 2 with 43% ee in 75% yield (entry 8).
rhodium-chiral amidophosphane-catalyzed addition of
arylboroxine reagents to N-sulfonylimines.9,10 As part of
our continuing effort to broaden the scope of the copper-
chiral amidophosphane-catalyzed addition of dialkylzinc
reagents to imines, we are interested in the possibility
of controlling 1,4- and 1,2-additions to aldimines of R,â-
unsaturated aldehydes, thereby providing an alternative
for hitherto difficult asymmetric conjugate addition to
R,â-unsaturated aldehydes.11,12 We describe herein that
the combination of Cu(MeCN)4BF4 and amidophosphane
5a catalyzes the conjugate addition of dialkylzinc to
aldimines 9 of R,â-unsaturated aldehydes to give the
corresponding adducts 10 with up to 91% ee in reason-
ably high yields.
Reaction of Diethylzinc with Cinnamaldehyde
and its N-Methanesulfonylimine. We began our stud-
ies with the reaction of cinnamaldehyde 1a with dieth-
ylzinc in the presence of 5 mol % copper(II) triflate and
6.5 mol % chiral amidophosphane 4c in toluene at 0 °C,
the conditions established in the 1,2-addition7c (Scheme
1, Figure 1). Although 1a was consumed within 5 h, a
FIGURE 1. Chiral amidophosphanes 4-6.
mixture of comparable amounts of 1,4- and 1,2-addition
alcohols (-)-213 with 7% ee and 3a14 with 13% ee was
(8) (a) Porter, J. R.; Traverse, J. F.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Snapper, M. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10409-10410. (b) Boezio, A. A.;
Pytkowicz, J.; Coˆte´, A.; Charette, A. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
14260-14261. (c) Coˆte´, A.; Boezio, A. A.; Charette, A. B. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5405-5410.
(9) Kuriyama, M.; Soeta, T.; Hao, X.; Chen, Q.; Tomioka, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8128-8129.
(10) (a) Review: Hayashi, T.; Yamasaki, K. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103,
2829-2844. (b) Hayashi, T.; Ishigetani, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 976-977. (c) Hayashi, T.; Ishigetani, M. Tetrahedron 2001, 57,
2589-2595. (d) Hermanns, N.; Dahmen, S.; Bolm, C.; Bra¨se, S. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3692-3694.
(11) Rhodium-catalyzed conjugate addition and reduction of cinnam-
aldehyde with arylboronic acid have been reported. (a) Itooka, R.;
Iguchi, Y.; Miyaura, N. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6000-6004. (b) Wang,
Z.; Zou, G.; Tang, J. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1192-1193.
(12) Asymmetric Michael reactions to enals have been reported. (a)
Brown, S. P.; Goodwin, N. C.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 1192-1194. (b) Ooi, T.; Doda, K.; Maruoka, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 9022-9023.
The source of copper was also influential on the
enantioselectivity of the reaction of 1d with a copper-5a
(13) Absolute configuration of (-)-2 was determined by comparison
of the specific rotation with the reported value. Pridgen, N.; Mokhal-
lalati, M. K.; Wu, M.-J. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1237-1241. The ee
was determined by chiral stationary phase HPLC (Daicel Chiralcel
OD-H, hexane/i-PrOH ) 50/1, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm, major 16.0 min
and minor 19.4 min).
(15) Georg, G. L.; Harriman, G. C. B.; Peterson, S. A. J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 7366-7368.
(16) Alexakis, A.; Benhaim, C.; Rosset, S.; Humam, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 5262-5263.
(17) Kanai, M.; Nakagawa, Y.; Tomioka, K. Tetrahedron 1999, 55,
3843-3854.
(14) Okamoto, T.; Oka, S. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 49, 1589-1594.
(18) Kanai, M.; Tomioka, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 4275-4278.
298 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 1, 2005