C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 5. Proposed model for the pH dependence of the hydrogen bonding
network of Gd-N2.
Figure 3. Proposed hydrogen bonding network of Gd-N1 and Gd-N3.
ammonium can no longer hydrogen bond to, and stabilize, the
coordination of a third water molecule. The resulting complex is
only eight-coordinate, with lower relaxivity.
The stabilities of the three GdIII complexes were measured by
spectrophotometric titration against DTPA. All complexes are highly
stable, with pM values11 comparable to those of the commercial
agents Gd-DTPA (19.2) and Gd-DOTA (19.4).2 In particular, the
stability of Gd-N1 (pM ) 19.5) is similar to that of the parent
Gd-Me (20.1).6 This indicates that coordination of a third water
molecule does not destabilizes the GdIII complex.
In summary, this report describes the increase of the hydration
number of HOPO-based GdIII complexes by substituting the TAM
podand with a moiety capable of hydrogen bonding a third water
molecule close to the metal center. The resulting nine-coordinate
GdIII complex is the first displaying three inner sphere water
molecules and high stability. The ensuing high relaxivity of this
small complex renders it a promising candidate for the development
of second generation contrast agents.
Figure 4. The pH dependence of the longitudinal relaxivity (r1p) of Gd-
N1 (black squares), Gd-N2 (open circles), and Gd-N3 (gray triangles).
complexes with fast water exchange.2 The “S” shaped profile
observed, characteristic of two overlapping decays, indicates a
change in coordination number with temperature. The nine-
coordinate complex is predominant at high temperature, and the
eight-coordinate one at low temperature.
Since no change in electronic parameters is observed, we do not
believe that the difference in q is due to a change in the ligands
coordinating the GdIII. The increase in coordination number from
Gd-N3 to Gd-N1 may, however, be rationalized by the hydrogen
bonding network created by the terminal moiety (Figure 3). The
ethylene bridge to the terminal primary amine of Gd-N1 positions
the nitrogen such that it may intramolecularly hydrogen bond to
the proton of the amide, which is also bonded to the catechol
oxygen. In our proposed model, the terminal amine hydrogen bonds
a solvent water molecule, thereby bringing it close to the open
coordination site of the GdIII and facilitating its coordination. In
Gd-N3, however, the tertiary nitrogen is probably intramolecularly
hydrogen bonded to the two primary amines. This is favored over
an intermolecular bond to a water molecule, such that the complex
remains eight-coordinate. Such hydrogen bonding networks have
already been observed in several crystal structures of lanthanide
poly(amino carboxylates) and HOPO-based complexes.4,8-10
The hydrogen bonding network and, hence, the relaxivity of the
complexes are pH dependent (Figure 4) and in agreement with
previous solution thermodynamic studies.11 Between pH 13 and 4,
Acknowledgment. This research was supported (UCB) by NIH
Grant HL69832 and NATO Travel Grant PST.CLG.980380. An
unrestricted gift from Schering AG is acknowledged, and we thank
Eric Werner for his assistance.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental pro-
cedures and characterization data for the synthesis of Gd-N1, Gd-N2,
and Gd-N3; spectrophotometric titration data, pH dependence of the
hydrogen bonding network of Gd-N3, temperature dependence of the
paramagnetic contribution to the water 17O NMR transverse relaxation
rate (r2p) for Gd-N2, Gd-N1, and Gd-N3. This material is available
References
(1) Paper no. 16 in the series “High Relaxivity MRI Agents”; for the previous
paper in the series, see: Thompson, M. K.; Misselwitz, B.; Tso, L.; Doble,
D. M. D. J.; Schmitt-Willich, H.; Raymond, K. R. J. Med. Chem. 2005,
48, 3874-3877.
(2) Caravan, P.; Ellison, J. J.; McMurry, T. J.; Lauffer, R. B. Chem. ReV.
1999, 99, 2293-2352.
(3) Raymond, K. N.; Pierre, V. C. Bioconjugate Chem. 2005, 16, 3-8.
(4) Xu, J.; Franklin, S. J.; Whisenhunt, D. W.; Raymond, K. N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 7245-7246.
r1p of Gd-N2 and Gd-N3 remains constant and corresponds to q )
2 complexes. At pH 3, the protonated TAM podand dissociates
the GdIII and is replaced by two water molecules, resulting in a
2-fold increase in r1p. The relaxivity then decreases toward pH 1
as the complex completely dissociates. The relaxivity of Gd-N1
displays different pH dependence (Figure 5). It remains constant
between pH 13 and 7 corresponding to the nine-coordinate, q ) 3,
complex. It decreases by about a third, to presumably a q ) 2
complex at pH 5, corresponding to the pKa of the terminal amine,
and increases again at pH 3 to the partially dissociated q ) 4 form.
As previously observed with the tertiary nitrogen of the TREN
backbone, favorable hydrogen bonding stabilizes the deprotonated
form of the pendant amine and consequently significantly decreases
its pKa to 5.8,11 Our interpretation is that, at this pH, the terminal
(5) Thompson, M. K.; Botta, M.; Nicolle, G.; Helm, L.; Aime, S.; Merbach,
A. E.; Raymond, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14274-14275.
(6) Cohen, S. M.; Xu, J.; Radkov, E.; Raymond, K. N.; Botta, M.; Barge, A.;
Aime, S. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 5747-5756.
(7) The fractional q number allows for a good fit of the data with physically
reasonable values of the parameters τR, τV, and ∆2. If q is fixed to either
2 or 3, unrealistic values of these parameters are obtained.
(8) Cohen, S. M.; O’Sullivan, B.; Raymond, K. N. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39,
4339-4346.
(9) Xu, J.; Churchill, D. G.; Botta, M.; Raymond, K. N. Inorg. Chem. 2004,
43, 5492-5494.
(10) Dickins, R. S.; Aime, S.; Batsanov, A. S.; Beeby, A.; Botta, M.; Bruce,
J.; Howard, J. A. K.; Love, C. S.; Parker, D.; Peacock, R. D.; Puschmann,
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12697-12705.
(11) Doble, D. M. J.; Melchior, M.; O’Sullivan, B.; Siering, C.; Xu, J. D.;
Pierre, V. C.; Raymond, K. N. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 4930-4937.
JA057805X
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 16, 2006 5345