M.L. Conrad et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 358 (2005) 63–69
65
in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) at 0 ꢁC. The reaction was allowed to
2.3. X-ray crystallography
proceed for 5 h at which point an orange precipitate was
collected by suction filtration and washed with Et2O
(3 · 10 mL) to afford 6 (0.08 g, 52%) as an orange solid.
M.p. 256–260 ꢁC (decomposition). Spectroscopic NMR
data (in DMSO-d6): 1H d: 9.47 (d, JH–H = 7 Hz,
JH–Pt = 42 Hz, 1H, Ar), 9.29 (s, JH–Pt = 97 Hz, 1H,
C(H)‚N), 8.46 (t of d, JH–H = 7, 2 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.21
(d, JH–H = 7 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.02 (t of d, JH–H = 7, 2 Hz,
1H, Ar), 7.32 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.21 (m, 1H, Ar), 2.35 (s,
3H, CH3); 13C{1H}: 173.6, 157.5, 149.7, 147.3, 141.2,
132.2, 130.6, 130.4, 130.2, 128.8, 126.7, 124.0, 18.2. IR
(nujol): 2966, 2945, 2888, 2844, 1714, 1462, 1377,
1304, 1184, 1155, 1111, 1041, 972, 941, 901, 769, 721,
521. C13H12N2Cl2Pt requires C, 33.77; H, 2.62; N,
6.06. Found: C, 33.24; H, 2.40; N, 5.68%.
Crystals of 5 and 7 were grown from saturated
CH2Cl2 solutions at 5 ꢁC. Single crystals were coated
with Paratone-N oil, mounted using a glass fibre and
frozen in the cold stream of the goniometer. A hemi-
sphere of data were collected on a Bruker AXS P4/
SMART 1000 diffractometer using x and h scans with
a scan width of 0.3ꢁ and 30 s (5) and 20 s (7) exposure
times. The detector distance was 6 cm (5) and 5 cm
(7). The data were reduced [14] and corrected for
absorption [15]. The structures were solved by direct
methods and refined by full-matrix least squares on F2
[16]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropi-
cally. Hydrogen atoms were located in Fourier differ-
ence maps and refined isotropically.
2.4. Cell culture
2.2.5. Compound 7
A CH2Cl2 (2 mL) solution of ligand (0.06 g, 0.26
mmol) was added to [PtCl2(coe)]2 (0.10 g, 0.13 mmol)
in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) at 0 ꢁC. The reaction was allowed
to proceed for 5 h at which point a precipitate was
collected by suction filtration and washed with Et2O
(3 · 10 mL) to afford 7 (0.08 g, 62%) as an orange so-
lid. M.p. 170–174 ꢁC (decomposition). Spectroscopic
NMR data (in DMSO-d6): 1H d: 9.50 (d, JH–H = 7
Hz, JH–Pt = 40 Hz, 1H, Ar), 9.46 (s, JH–Pt = 95 Hz,
1H, C(H)‚N), 8.46 (t of d, JH–H = 7, 2 Hz, 1H,
Ar), 8.26 (d, JH–H = 7 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.04–8.01 (ov m,
5H, Ar), 7.64–7.61 (ov m, 3H, Ar); 13C{1H} d:
173.2, 157.7, 149.7, 145.5, 141.3, 133.1, 132.7, 130.3,
130.2, 128.9, 128.3, 128.1, 127.7, 127.6, 123.8, 122.6.
IR (nujol): 2966, 2945, 2891, 2845, 1712, 1462, 1377,
1269, 1169, 974, 939, 893, 862, 823, 758, 723.
C16H12N2Cl2Pt requires C, 38.56; H, 2.43; N, 5.62.
Found: C, 38.20; H, 2.26; N, 5.45%.
OV2008 (human ovarian carcinoma) and the analo-
gous cisplatin-resistant cell line C13 were a generous gift
from Dr. Barbara C. Vanderhyden of the Centre for
Cancer Therapeutics, Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre,
Ont., Canada. Both cell lines were cultured in complete
RPMI-1640 medium with
L-glutamine, supplemented
with 5% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (50 units/mL),
and streptomycin (50 mg/mL). Cells were incubated in
a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 ꢁC and were
subcultured twice weekly using trypsin-EDTA.
2.5. Cell growth inhibition assay
Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a concentration
of 0.1–1.0 · 104 cells/well in 200 lL of complete media
and incubated for 24 h at 37 ꢁC in a 5% CO2 atmosphere
to allow for cell adhesion. Stock solutions (15 mM) of
the compounds made in DMSO were filter sterilized,
then diluted to 10 mM in phosphate buffered saline
(PBS, 0.02 M phosphate, 0.11 M NaCl, pH 7.0, sterile).
The 10 mM solutions were diluted to 50 lM and 1.4 mM
in complete media for treatment against OV2008 and
C13 cell lines, respectively. Precisely 20 lL of compound
solutions were added to 180 lL of fresh media in wells to
give final concentrations of 5 lM against OV2008 and
140 lM for C13. All assays were performed in two inde-
pendent sets of quadruplicate tests. Control groups con-
taining no drug were run in each assay, along
with standards of cisplatin and a previously studied
cis-dichloro(pyridin-2-ylcarboxaldimine)platinum(II)
complex (2).
2.2.6. Compound 8
A CH2Cl2 (2 mL) solution of ligand (0.08 g, 0.28
mmol) was added to [PtCl2(coe)]2 (0.10 g, 0.13 mmol)
in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) at 0 ꢁC. The reaction was allowed
to proceed for 5 h at which point a precipitate was col-
lected by suction filtration and washed with Et2O (3 · 10
mL) to afford 8 (0.09 g, 63%) as an orange solid. M.p.
362–363 ꢁC (decomposition). Spectroscopic NMR data
1
(in DMSO-d6): H d: 9.52 (ov m, 2H, Ar & C(H)‚N),
8.69 (s, 2H, Ar), 8.48 (t, JH–H = 7 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.28
(d, JH–H = 7 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.20–8.15 (ov m, 4H, Ar),
8.02 (t, JH–H = 7 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.60–7.57 (ov m, 3H,
Ar); 13C{1H} d: 173.1, 157.7, 149.7, 145.7, 141.2,
138.2, 132.4, 132.3, 130.9, 130.6, 130.3, 130.2, 128.7,
128.6, 128.3, 127.7, 126.8, 126.7, 124.0, 122.5. IR (nujol):
2974, 2881, 2839, 1712, 1462, 1377, 1159, 903, 756, 474.
C20H14N2 Cl2Pt requires C, 43.80; H, 2.58; N, 5.11.
Found: C, 43.61; H, 2.43; N, 5.00%.
Following 48 h of exposure, each well was carefully
rinsed with 200 lL PBS buffer. MTT solution (50 lL,
1 mg/mL ddH2O) along with 200 lL of fresh, complete
media were added to each well, and plates were incu-
bated for 45 min. Following incubation, the media was
removed and the purple formazan precipitate in each