which behaves like a mononuclear type in contrast to the step-wise
two-step SCO through a mixed spin state [HS–LS] for the bpym
and phdia complexes.4–7 Such a two-step SCO process may result
from the difference in intra- and intermolecular interactions. The
intramolecular interactions in complex 1 are characteristic of the
rigid bridging site comprising two tetradentate bpypz ligands as
compared with the flexible bidentate bridging moiety in the m-bpym
and m-phdia Fe(II) complexes. As for the intermolecular interac-
tions in complex 1, there are additional p–p stackings between the
pyridyl and phenyl of the 4-phpy other than those between the
bpypz ligands as for the pyridine complex.9 Since the synergy
between the inter- and intramolecular interactions is considered to
be responsible for two-step SCO, the strong intermolecular
interactions in complex 1 are likely to favor the like-spin pair
…
([HS–HS] [LS–LS]) rather than the mixed spin one ([HS–LS]).
The two-step SCO occurrence for the present 4-pypy complex
along with the preliminary observation for the corresponding
isoquinoline complex could give a clue to deeper understanding of
two-step SCO phenomena in dinuclear complexes.
Notes and references
Fig. 3 Perspective views of complex 1 at 200 K: views (a) nearly along the
c axis or parallel to the ac plane, (b) and (c) nearly from the negative and
positive side of the a axis, respectively (see text).
{ The complex was prepared from trans-[Fe(NCBH3)2(py)4] and excess
amounts of 4-phenylpyridine in methanol solutions under an N2 stream.
Yield 36%. Anal. Calcd. for C50H42N12B2Fe2 ~ (1): C, 63.60; H, 4.48; N,
17.80%. Found: C, 63.06; H, 4.31; N, 17.28%.
of the high-spin [HS–HS] and low-spin [LS–LS] dinuclear
complexes in the asymmetric unit doubled in size from 296 and
100 K. That is, the bond lengths around the Fe(1) and Fe(2) at
200 K correspond to those around Fe(1) at 296 and 100 K,
§ Crystal data for C50H42N12B2Fe2(1). For T ~ 296 K, a red block crystal,
¯
M ~ 944.28, triclinic, space group P1, Z ~ 1, a ~ 9.4567(2), b ~
˚
c ~ 13.1355(5) A, a ~ 92.519(6), b ~ 108.793(9),
3
10.7576(6),
c ~ 105.710(5)u, V ~ 1205.1(1) A , Dc ~ 1.301 g cm23, m(MoKa) ~
6.50 cm21, R/wR2: 0.056/0.1638, F000 ~ 488.00, total reflections: 8427,
unique (Rint): 5236 (0.036). For T ~ 200 K, a red block crystal, M ~
˚
˚
˚
respectively; average Fe–N ~ 2.116 A (Fe(2)) and 2.0005 A (Fe(1))
˚
at 200 K; 2.1667 A (Fe(1)) at 296 K and 1.9795 A (Fe(1)) at 100 K;
˚
¯
*
Fe(2)–Fe(2) ~ 4.2000(8) A and Fe(1)–Fe(1) ~ 4.0605(8) A at
*
944.28, triclinic, space group P1, Z ~ 2, a ~ 9.3509(2), b ~ 14.9124(1),
˚
˚
˚
*
c ~ 17.1648(4)A, a ~ 99.612(1), b ~ 94.551(1), c ~ 98.174(1)u, V ~
˚
˚
200 K; Fe(1)–Fe(1) ~ 4.2147 (8) A at 296 K and 4.0434(6) A at
100 K. There are p–p stacking interactions between the adjacent
bpypz, by which a layer and a chain are formed as found for the py
complex.9 At 200 K, the [HS–HS] and [LS–LS] complexes are
arranged in alternate chains through the p–p stackings not only
between the 4-phpy, but also between the pyridyls of the bpypz.
3
2322.89(8) A , Dc ~ 1.350 g cm23, m(MoKa) ~ 6.74 cm21, R/wR2: 0.0739/
˚
0.1755, F000 ~ 976, total reflections: 14676, unique (Rint): 10011 (0.073).
For T ~ 100 K, a black block crystal, M ~ 944.28, triclinic, space group
¯
˚
P1, Z ~ 1, a ~ 9.0589(3), b ~ 10.682(1), c ~ 12.6458(8)A, a ~ 93.521(8),
3
23
,
˚
b ~ 109.12(1), c ~ 104.560(8)u, V ~ 1105.2(2) A , Dc ~ 1.419 g cm
m(MoKa) ~ 7.08 cm21, R/wR2: 0.0574/0.1745, F000 ~ 488.00, total
reflections: 5896, unique (Rint): 4314 (0.039). CCDC 241137–241139. See
.cif or other electronic format.
…
The p–p stackings between the bpypz exist for the pz py between
[HS–HS] and [HS–HS] as well as [LS–LS] and [LS–LS] and for the
pyridyl (HS) pyridyl(LS) (Fig. 3(a)) as the py complex. For a
…
given 4-phpy in [HS–HS] or [LS–LS] at 200 K, strong p–p stackings
of the pyridyl and phenyl on one side are made, respectively, with
the phenyl and pyridyl for the 4-phpy in the adjacent [LS–LS] or
1 (a) P. Gu¨tlich, Y. Garcia and H. A. Goodwin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2000, 29,
419; (b) J. A. Real, A. B. Gaspar, V. Niel and M. C. Mun˜oz, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 2003, 236, 121; (c) G. J. Halder, C. J. Kepert, B. Moubaraki,
K. S. Murray and J. D. Cashion, Science, 2002, 298, 1762.
2 D. Chernyshov, M. Hostettler, K. W. To¨rnroos and H.-B. Bu¨rgi, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3825.
3 (a) H. Toflund, in Magnetism: A Function, ed. O. Kahn, Kluwer
Academic, The Netherlands, 1996, p. 323; (b) R. Boca, Theoretical
Foundations of Molecular Magnetism, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999.
4 (a) J. A. Real, J. Zaremhowitch, O. Kahn and X. Solans, Inorg. Chem.,
1987, 26, 2939; (b) G. Chastanet, A. B. Gaspar, J. A. Real and
J.-F. Le´tard, Chem. Commun., 2001, 819; (c) E. Andre´s, G. De Munno,
M. Julve, J. A. Real and F. Lloret, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1993,
2169; (d) G. De Munno, M. Julve, J. A. Real and F. Lloret, Inorg. Chim.
Acta, 1996, 250, 81.
5 (a) J. A. Real, H. Bolvin, A. Bousseksou, A. Dworkin, O. Kahn,
F. Varret and J. Zarembowitch, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 4650;
(b) J. A. Real, I. Castro, A. Boussenksou, M. Verdaguer, R. Burriel,
M. Castro, J. Linares and F. Varret, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36, 455; (c)
J.-F. Le´tard, J. A. Real, N. Moliner, A. B. Gasper, L. Capes, O. Cador
and O. Kahn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 10630.
6 (a) V. Ksenofontov, H. Spiering, S. Reiman, Y. Garcia, A. B. Gaspar,
N. Moliner, J. A. Real and P. Gu¨tlich, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2001, 348, 381;
(b) V. Ksenofontov, A. B. Gaspar, J. A. Real and P. Gu¨tlich, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 2001, 105, 12266; (c) A. B. Gaspar, V. Ksenofontov, J. A. Real
and P. Gu¨tlich, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2003, 373, 385.
…
[HS–HS] (Fig. 3(b)), and on the other back side weak phenyl
phenyl p–p stackings with the other neighboring 4-phpy in the [LS–
LS] or [HS–HS] (Fig. 3(c)). There are significant voids in the
crystals, but no electron density is found. All these crystallographic
characteristics support the occurrence of a direct two-step spin
transition from [HS–HS] to [LS–LS] through a mixture of [HS–
…
HS] [LS–LS] intermediates.
Moreover, the far IR and Raman spectra confirm the direct two-
…
step SCO through [HS–HS] [LS–LS]. Since the IR and Raman
spectra of complex 1 are different from each other, the mutual
exclusion selection rules in the C2h point group for the vibrational
spectra hold. At 200 K, the IR and Raman bands give the additive
pattern of those at 296 and 100 K, maintaining the selection rule for
IR and Raman spectra. This fact suggests that the molecular
symmetry remains pseudo C2h point group for each unit of [HS–
HS] and [LS–LS], but does not convert to the Cs point group of
mixed spin state [HS–LS] at 200 K. In fact, there is no extra band at
200 K except the IR and Raman bands observed at 296 and
100 K. Each IR active band at 366.5 and 357 cm21 exhibits only
single occupancy at 296 and 100 K, respectively. The corresponding
bands at 200 K are observed at 364.6 and 357 cm21. On the other
hand, the intensities of the Raman active bands at 380 and
250 cm21 increase on decreasing the temperature. Therefore, these
spectral behaviors demonstrate the coexistence of [HS–HS] and
[LS–LS].
7 V. Ksenofontov, A. B. Gaspar, V. Niel, S. Reimen, J. A. Real and
P. Gu¨tlich, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10, 1291.
8 B. A. Leita, B. Moubaraki, K. S. Murray, J. P. Smith and J. D. Cashion,
Chem. Commun., 2004, 156.
9 K. Nakano, N. Suemura, S. Kawata, A. Fuyuhiro, T. Yagi, S. Nasu,
S. Morimoto and S. Kaizaki, Dalton Trans., 2004, 982.
10 N. Suemura, M. Ohama and S. Kaizaki, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1538.
In conclusion, the two-step SCO of complex 1 is found to
proceed through a mixture of [HS–HS] and [LS–LS] at the plateau
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 2 8 9 2 – 2 8 9 3
2 8 9 3