G Model
CATTOD-9000; No. of Pages9
2
S.S. Sable et al. / Catalysis Today xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
the ozone decomposition [21–23]. Heterogeneous catalytic ozona-
tion has received increasing attention since Chen et al. [24] studied
the removal of phenol and ethyl acetoacetate in a packed column
with ozone and a Fe2O3 catalyst, due to its higher effectiveness in
the degradation of organic pollutants. Some organic compounds
that are difficult to degrade by single ozonation can be oxidized by
catalytic ozonation at ambient temperature and pressure [25].
Concerning the Fenton reaction, the major problem of the homo-
geneous catalytic system is the pH control and the production
of toxic wastes that require further treatments [26]. Heteroge-
neous Fenton processes are very interesting because most of the
iron remains in the solid phase and can be reused [27,28]. Iron
oxides are found abundantly in nature and easily synthesized
in laboratory. There are some iron oxides that exist in nature,
e.g. hematite (␣-Fe2O3), maghemite (␥-Fe2O3), magnetite (Fe3O4),
goethite (␣-FeOOH), lepidocrocite (␥-FeOOH) and wustite (FeO).
Iron oxyhydroxide (FeOOH) materials have been used in heteroge-
for organic and inorganic compounds, respectively [29]. Supported
and unsupported metals and metal oxides are the most commonly
tested catalysts for the ozonation of organic compounds in water
[30].
FeOOH as heterogeneous catalyst has also been used in Fenton-
ing into solution. Goethite (␣-FeOOH), Cu-doped goethite and
supported nanosized ␣-FeOOH have been studied for the oxi-
dation of quinoline and dimethyl phthalate (DMP) by Fenton
and photoelectro-Fenton processes [26,31–33]. This study aims to
investigate the efficiency of FeOOH calcined at different tempera-
tures (to obtain different phases such as maghemite and hematite),
supported FeOOH on ␥-Al2O3 and ZrO2 and lepidocrocite catalysts,
for the degradation of aqueous solutions of clofibric acid at ambient
temperature and pressure by two types of heterogeneous advanced
oxidation processes: Fenton-like process and catalytic ozonation.
The addition of little amounts of Pd has also been studied.
2.2. Catalysts characterization
Metal content of the Lepidocrocite (␥-FeOOH) and commer-
cial FeOOH samples was measured by ICP-OES (SPECTRO-ARCOS
FHS16). The bulk and surface properties of the catalysts were stud-
ied by XRD, N2 physisorption method and X-ray photoelectron
D8-Discover diffractometer with parallel incident beam (Göbel
mirror) and vertical theta-theta goniometer, XYZ motorized stage
mounted on an Eulerian cradle, diffracted-beam Soller slits, a 0.02◦
receiving slit and a scintillation counter as a detector. The angular
2ꢀ diffraction range was between 5 and 70◦. The data were collected
with an angular step of 0.05◦ at 3 s per step and sample rotation.
Cuk radiation was obtained from a copper X-ray tube operated at
˚
40 kV and 40 mA (ꢁ = 1.541 A). N2 adsorption was performed using
a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 apparatus at 77 K. Before analysis, the
samples were degasified at 120 ◦C for 12 h. Total surface area was
calculated by the BET method. To investigate the surface oxidation
state of iron oxide in the samples, XPS analysis was carried out
using ESCA-3000 (VGScientific Ltd., England) with a base pressure
10−9 Pa. AlK␣ source (1486.6 eV), operated at 150 W was used as a
X-ray source. The binding energy values were charge-corrected to
the C1s signal (284.6 eV). Vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM),
model LakeShore 7307 was used for the magnetic measurements
of the samples. All the measurements were carried out at room
temperature.
Amount of leached Fe was measured by ICP-OES (SPECTRO-
ARCOS FHS16).
2.3. Experimental procedure
2.3.1. I. Fenton-like reaction
The degradation of clofibric acid (99%, Across Organics) was car-
ried out at ambient conditions (25 ◦C and atmospheric pressure) in
a glass reactor with a capacity of 250 mL. 100 mL of clofibric acid
solution (100 or 25 mg/L) and (0.25–5 g/L) of H2O2 with (1–3 g/L)
of catalyst was introduced. Oxidation experiments were conducted
for 2 and 6 h and samples were periodically withdrawn, quenched
by few drops of sodium thiosulfate solution and further analyzed
by HPLC (CFA concentration) and TOC analysis. CFA concentra-
tions were measured by high performance liquid chromatography
HPLC (Shimadzu LC-2010 equipped with a SPD-M10A Diode array
UV–vis detector) at 230 nm wavelength. A Varian OmniSpher C18
column and a solution containing an aqueous buffer (Milli-Q H2O
1 L, methanol 50 mL and H3PO4 4 mL) and acetonitrile (40:60) was
used as mobile phase. The reaction intermediates were identified
qualitatively by HPLC (1200 Series) coupled to a 6210 Time of Flight
(TOF) mass detector with electrospray ion source (ESI) (Agilent
Technologies, S.L.) using the same column as mentioned above. The
mobile phase was a mixture of solutions A and B with a flow rate of
0.4 mL/min. A was 0.1% formic acid and 5% Milli-Q water in acetoni-
trile and B was 0.1% formic acid in water (pH 3.5). The analyses were
performed under a linear gradient from 10% A to 100% A at 30 min.
remaining steady for further 5 min. Ion source and TOF param-
eters are as: drying gas temperature 350 ◦C, nebulizer gas flow
10 L/min, nebulizer gas pressure 50 psi, fragmentor voltage 150 V,
capillary voltage 4000 V, skimmer voltage 650 V, octapol voltage
250 V and acquisition range 50–1200 m/z. TOC was measured by
a Shimadzu 5000-A TOC analyzer. H2O2 was semi- quantitatively
measured by H2O2 indicator strips. All the reactions were per-
formed at darkness. Higher concentrations than those commonly
found in wastewaters were used to compare the efficiency of the
different catalysts tested and to favor the accuracy in the analytical
determinations.
2. Experimental
2.1. Catalyst preparation
Commercial FeOOH was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich and fur-
ther calcined at different temperatures (200–350 ◦C), for 2 h in
presence of static air.
Catalysts with 0.5 wt% Pd [Pd (NO3)2 by Johnson Matthey]
on FeOOH were prepared by impregnation method and further
calcined at 200 ◦C for 2 h in presence of static air. ␥-alumina syn-
thesized by sol–gel method and commercial ZrO2 (by Saint-Gobain)
were used to prepare supported catalysts. FeOOH supported on ␥-
alumina and ZrO2 catalysts were also prepared by impregnation
method and further calcined at 200 ◦C for 2 h in presence of static
air.
Lepidocrocite (␥-FeOOH) was synthesized at 25 ◦C following a
procedure from Schwertmann and Cornell [34]. 300 mL of distilled
water were introduced into a 500 mL glass beaker equipped with a
stirrer, a combined pH electrode and a buret containing 1 M NaOH
solution. Then, 12.0 g of FeCl2·4H2O (60 mM of Fe) were added and
the mixture was left in contact with oxygen (50 mL/min) under
stirring. NaOH (about 120 mL) was continuously added during the
synthesis in order to maintain the pH within the 6.7–6.9 range. After
about 3 h, the completion of the oxidation reaction was obtained,
as revealed by the orange color of the suspension. Filtration was
done and the solid was dried at ambient temperature and further
calcined at different temperatures (200– 350 ◦C) for 2 h in presence
of static air.
Please cite this article in press as: S.S. Sable, et al., FeOOH and derived phases: Efficient heterogeneous catalysts for clofibric acid