Ligand Exchange of the Lanthanide Complex
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 2. Catalytic Asymmetric Epoxidation of R,â-Unsaturated
Simple Amides Promoted by the Sm-(S)-BINOL-Ph3AsdO
Complex 1
R-hydroxyamide 4a in 99% yield with complete regioselectivity
(entry 1). Reduced catalyst loading (0.2 mol %) was sufficient
to complete the reaction, affording 4a in 97% yield after 2 h
(entry 2). The use of 5 mol % of the (S)-Sm complex 1 also
completed the reaction with comparable reactivity (entry 3). In
contrast, the reaction with 10 mol % Sm(OTf)3, a much stronger
Lewis acid, proceeded sluggishly to give 4a in 21% yield after
24 h (entry 4).14 Only a trace amount of 4a was obtained in the
absence of the catalyst, even after 48 h.
Table 1. Regioselective Ring Opening of R,â-Epoxy Amide with
Me3SiN3 Using Various Sm Catalysts
(B) One-Pot Sequential Catalytic Asymmetric Epoxi-
dation-Regioselective Epoxide-Opening Process. Encouraged
by the above results, we examined the extension to a one-pot
sequential catalytic asymmetric epoxidation-regioselective ep-
oxide-opening process using the (S)-Sm complex 1. We
hypothesized that both the asymmetric epoxidation and the
following nucleophilic epoxide-opening reaction would be
catalyzed by the Sm complex 1 through a dynamic ligand
exchange. After completion of the catalytic asymmetric epoxi-
dation of R,â-unsaturated amide 2a, 2 equiv of Me3SiN3 were
directly added to the reaction mixture. The epoxide opening
proceeded smoothly at room temperature without significant
adverse effects, and subsequent desilylation afforded 4a in 99%
overall yield with 99% ee (Table 2, entry 1). Table 2 summarizes
the scope and limitations of the sequential process. The present
one-pot sequential process was applicable to various R,â-
unsaturated amides 2 with broad substrate generality, and the
enantioselectivity was generally excellent (96->99%). In the
presence of 2 to 10 mol % of (S)-Sm complex 1, tertiary amides
with various â-aryl substituents (2a-h, 2j, entries 1-10, 12)
underwent the sequential process at room temperature, affording
the corresponding anti-â-azido-R-hydroxyamides 4 in good to
excellent yield (70-99%). In these cases, the epoxide-opening
reaction was completed within 1-3 h, and the overall yield
mainly reflected the conversion of the epoxidation reaction.
Despite the high instability of the corresponding epoxide of 2i
(entry 11), the present sequential process successfully provided
4i, representing an advantageous example. The fact that even
such a challenging substrate gave 45% chemical yield was very
encouraging.15 The asymmetric epoxidation and the epoxide-
opening reaction of R,â,γ,δ-unsaturated amide 2k occurred
regioselectively to afford 4k (entry 13). Both the epoxidation
and epoxide opening of the secondary amide 2l proceeded
slowly compared with that of tertiary amide 2a, giving 4l in
83% overall yield (entry 14). R,â-Unsaturated amides with
â-aliphatic substituents (2m-r, entries 15-20) were also
applicable to the present sequential process. Even in these cases,
the epoxide-opening reactions proceeded smoothly at room
temperature, and it was noteworthy that the products were
obtained with complete regioselectivity. Cyclic substrates (2m,
2n) gave the corresponding tert-alcohols, thereby constructing
stereogenic tetrasubstituted carbon centers (entries 15 and 16).
Acyclic substrates 2o-q afforded 4o-q as the sole detectable
products in good yield (84-92%; entries 17-19). γ-Branched
entry
catalyst
x (mol %)
time (h)
yielda (%)
1b
2b
3b
Sm(O-i-Pr)3
Sm(O-i-Pr)3
Sm-(S)-BINOL-Ph3AsdO
(1:1:1) complex 1
Sm(OTf)3
5
0.2
5
1
2
1
99
97
99
4c
10
24
21
a Isolated yield. b Desilylation was conducted with 1 N HCl aq-MeOH.
c Desilylation was conducted with KF in MeOH.
enantiomeric excess (up to >99%).10 The highly enantioenriched
R,â-epoxy amides, in particular R,â-epoxy morpholinyl amides,9b,e
are versatile intermediates because reductive or nucleophilic
epoxide opening and a modification of the amide moiety provide
efficient access to useful chiral building blocks. There are few
reports on the efficient synthesis of optically active R,â-epoxy
amides11 other than ours, indicating that the ring-opening
reaction of R,â-epoxy amides has not been widely investigated,
despite its utility. The regioselective epoxide-opening reaction
with various nucleophiles is one of the most important trans-
formations in organic synthesis because the epoxide-opened
product is obtained with complete control of the vicinal
stereochemistry. Chong and Sharpless reported a ring-opening
reaction of R,â-epoxy amides with PhSH promoted by 150 mol
% of Ti(O-i-Pr)4.12 Secondary amides showed preference for
ring opening at the â-position, whereas tertiary amides at the
R-position. Aggarwal et al. reported a highly â-selective ring-
opening reaction of tertiary R,â-epoxy amides with either PhSH
or Me3SiN3 promoted by Yb(OTf)3.11b Yamamoto et al. reported
a regioselective epoxide-opening reaction with Me3SiN3 using
catalytic Yb(O-i-Pr)3.13 Although R,â-epoxy carbonyl com-
pounds were not utilized in the epoxide-opening reactions
reported by Yamamoto et al.13 and Utimoto et al.,2 we assumed
that Sm(O-i-Pr)3 would promote the regioselective ring opening
of R,â-epoxy amides to provide â-substituted R-hydroxyamides.
The ring-opening reaction of R,â-epoxy amide with a
lanthanide catalyst was examined prior to the one-pot sequential
reaction. Table 1 summarizes the results of epoxide-opening
reactions with Me3SiN3 in the presence of samarium catalysts.
As we expected, treatment of R,â-epoxy amide 3a with 2 equiv
of Me3SiN3 in the presence of 5 mol % Sm(O-i-Pr)3 led to a
clean epoxide opening within 1 h at room temperature.
Subsequent desilylation gave the corresponding anti-â-azido-
(14) For regioselective epoxide-opening reactions with azide using other Lewis
acid catalysts, see: (a) Denis, J.-N.; Green, A. E.; Serra, A. A.; Luche,
M.-J. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 46. (b) Azzena, F.; Crotti, P.; Favero, L.;
Pineschi, M. Tetrahedron 1995, 48, 13409. (c) Francesco, F.; Pizzo, F.;
Vaccaro, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1131. (d) Francesco, F.; Pizzo,
F.; Vaccaro, L. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3554.
(11) (a) Zhou, Y.-G.; Hou, X.-L.; Dai, L.-X.; Xia, L.-J.; Tang, M.-H. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 77. (b) Aggarwal, V. K.; Hynd, G.; Picoul,
W.; Vasse, J.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9964.
(12) Chong, J. M.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1560.
(13) Meguro, M.; Asao, N.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem. Commun. 1995, 1021. The
reaction mechanism was not described in this article.
(15) The syn isomer was contaminated with the anti isomer (anti:syn ) 11:1).
The moderate overall yield was due to the partial decomposition of the
corresponding R,â-epoxy amide during the epoxidation reaction.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 7, 2005 2149