protected adduct of diene 10. Standard THP deprotection of
the cross-coupling product afford dienyl alcohol 10 in 82%
yield for both steps. Moffatt-Swern oxidation of alcohol
10 and subsequent Ohira-Bestmann modification of the
Seyferth-Gilbert reaction14,15 furnished alkyne 11 in excel-
lent yield.
The addition of the dimethylaluminum alkyne adduct of
alkyne 11 to epoxide 7 efficiently furnished the complete
carbon skeleton of pseudodistomin D (Scheme 5). Treatment
AuCl3-HCl catalyst resulted in complete decomposition
within 10 min at 60 °C.19 To minimize the competing
decomposition, optimization studies were focused on utilizing
less reactive hydroamination conditions. Hydroamination
with 10% silver tosylate in acetonitrile at 40 °C for 2 h
proved to be optimal. The hydroamination reaction was
immediately quenched, by reduction of the Ag(I) catalyst,
and the intermediate imine reduced in situ by sodium cyano-
borohydride to provide piperidine 13 in a reasonable 52%
yield for the overall two-step BOC deprotection and reductive
hydroamination sequence. The reductive hydroamination
proceeded with no detectable diastereomer or pyrrolidine
byproducts.20 Standard and quantitative silyl deprotection
Scheme 5. Synthesis of Pseudodistomin D
provided pseudodistomin D [R]25 ) +6° (c 0.2, MeOH)
D
(lit.3 [R]25D ) +5° (c 0.26, MeOH)). The 1H and 13C NMR
spectra correlate with the listed chemical shifts and coupling
constants reported for the isolated material.3
The piperidine core of pseudodistomin D, where all of
the substituents can occupy equatorial positions in a chair
conformation, presented a unique opportunity to exploit a
reductive hydroamination strategy. By utilizing the free
diamines in compound 2, the hydroamination proceeded in
a significantly increased rate over related 6-exo-dig cycliza-
tions18,19 and circumvented the need for another protecting
group. There are several explanations that can be put forward
to rationalize the selective formation of the piperidine
product. One rationalization is that the hydroamination of
alkyne 2 proceeds through a kinetic 5-exo-dig cyclization
to furnish imine 14, which is in a rapid equilibrium with
imine 16 (Scheme 6). Due to the significant difference in
of compound 12 with TBSOTf and 2,6-lutidine16 and
subsequent hydrolysis of the resulting TBS carbamates in
one pot cleanly deprotected the BOC groups while simul-
taneously protecting the alcohol in near quantitative yield
to provide silyl ether 2. Of the plethora of transition metal
catalysts for hydroamination of alkynes,17 we focused on
silver and gold catalysis due to their increased tolerance of
Lewis basic functionalities over other systems.18 Initial
hydroamination experiments with 10% AgOTs at 60 °C in
acetonitrile for 1 h proved to be problematic due to
competitive decomposition of the imine intermediate by the
catalyst. Furthermore, hydroamination with the more reactive
Scheme 6. Reductive Hydroamination of Alkyne 2
(8) Chern, C.-Y.; Huang, Y.-P.; Kan, W. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
44, 1039-1041.
(9) Kabalka, G. W.; Li, N.-S.; Pace, R. D. Synth. Commun. 1995, 25,
2135-2143.
(10) (a) Luly, J. R.; Dellaria, J. F.; Plattner, J. J.; Soderquist, J. L.; Yi,
N. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1487-1492. (b) Romeo, S.; Rich, D. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 7187-7190. (c) Romeo, S.; Rich, D. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 4939-4942.
(11) (a) Ma, D.; Lu, X. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 6319-6330. (b) Huang,
H.; Forsyth, C. J. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8595-8599.
(12) Chen, M.-J.; Narkunan, K.; Liu, R.-S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
8311-8318.
(13) Negishi, E.; Takahashi, T.; Baba, S.; Van Horn, D. E.; Okukado,
N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2393-2401.
reduction rates of an sp2 to a sp3 carbon between a 5 and
six-membered rings,21 the reduction of imine 16 is favored.22
Therefore, a Curtin-Hammett situation is created wherein
the reduction specifically yields the desired piperidine 13.
(19) 1H NMR experiment with 10% AuCl3-HCl and 2 in CD3CN
afforded complete decomposition in 10 min at 60 °C. No competitive
decomposition was observed under analogous hydroamination conditions
with undec-5-ynylamine.
(14) (a) Ohiro, S. Synth. Commun. 1989, 19, 561-564. (b) Muller, S.;
Liepold, B.; Roth, B.; Bestmann, H. J. Synlett 1996, 521-522.
(15) Ohira-Bestmann reagent ) dimethyl(acetyldiazomethyl)phos-
phonate.
(20) Using a more standard strategy in which the appropriate keto-
diamine undergoes an intramolecular reductive amination, the pyrrolidine
and/or piperidine products were obtained in modest yields. Given the
additional steps necessary to furnish the keto-diamine and the modest yield
of the subsequent reductive amination, this strategy was disfavored over
the reductive hydroamination reported herein. By both chromatographic and
spectroscopic methods, the pyrrolidine and piperidine are easily distinguish-
able.
(21) Brown, H. C.; Ichikawa, K. Tetrahedron 1957, 1, 221-230.
(22) Examples of six-membered imine reduction occurring selectively
over five-membered imine reduction in an approach toward thiostrepton
are: (a) Higashibayashi, S.; Hashimoto, K.; Nakata, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 105-110. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Nevalainen, M.; Safina, B. S.;
Zak, M.; Bulat, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1941-1945.
(16) Sakaitani, M.; Ohfune, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 870-876.
(17) (a) Muller, T. E.; Beller, M. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 675-703. (b)
Muller, T. E.; Pleier, A.-K. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1999, 583-587.
(c) Su, R. Q.; Muller, T. E. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 6027-6033. (d) Beller,
M.; Breindl, C.; Eichberger, M.; Hartung, C. G.; Seayad, J.; Thiel, O. R.;
Tillack, A.; Trauthwein, H. Synlett 2002, 10, 1579-1594. (e) Pohlki, F.;
Doye, S. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2003, 32, 104-114.
(18) (a) Fukuda, Y.; Utimoto, K. Synthesis 1991, 975-978. (b) Muller,
T. E.; Grosche, M.; Herdtweck, E.; Pleier, A.-K.; Walter, E.; Yan, Y.-K.
Organometallics 2000, 19, 170-183.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 5, 2005
825