Platinum and Mercury Complexes Chelated by (Phenylthiomethyl)silane Ligands
[2] N. Ruiz, A. Aaliti, J. Fornies-Camer, A. Ruiz, C. Claver, C.
Table 4 Crystallographic data for compounds 3 and 4.
J. Cardin, D. Fabbri, S. Gladiali, J. Organomet. Chem. 1997,
545Ϫ546, 79.
Identification code
3
4
[3] A. Gomis, G. Net, A. Ruiz, C. Claver, A. Alvarez-Larena,
Inorg. Chim. Acta 2001, 325, 58.
[4] A. Bastero, C. Claver, A. Ruiz, Catalysis Letters 2002, 82, 85.
[5] A. M. Masdeu-Bulto, M. Dieguez, E. Martin, M. Gomez,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 242, 159.
[6] P. Braunstein, T. Faure, M. Knorr, T. Stährfeld, A. DeCian,
J. Fischer, Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1995, 125, 35; M. Knorr,
C. Strohmann, P. Braunstein, Organometallics 1996, 15, 5653.
[7] M. Knorr, F. Guyon, I. Jourdain, S. Kneifel, J. Frenzel,
C. Strohmann, Inorg. Chim. Acta 2003, 350, 455.
[8] J.-R. Li, M. Du, R.-H. Zhang, X.-H. Bu, J. Mol. Struc. 2002,
607, 175.
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Wavelength
Crystal system
Space group
C26H24Br2HgS2Si
789.07
0.71073 A
C18H20Cl2PtS2Si
594.54
0.71073 A
˚
˚
monoclinic
P21/c
a ϭ 14.557(3) A,
b ϭ 20.108(4) A,
c ϭ 9.367(2) A,
monoclinic
P21/n
a ϭ 10.327(2) A,
b ϭ 12.623(4) A,
c ϭ 14.903(3) A,
˚
˚
˚
˚
˚
Unit cell dimensions
˚
α ϭ 90
α ϭ 90
β ϭ 97.33(3)°
γ ϭ 90°
β ϭ 91.19(3)°
γ ϭ 90°
3
3
˚
˚
Volume
Z
Density (calculated)
Absorption coefficient
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
Theta range for data collection 2.41 to 25.0°
Index ranges
2728.1(10) A
4
1942.3(7) A
4
1.921 Mg/m3
8.781 mmϪ1
1504
2.033 Mg/m3
7.774 mmϪ1
144
[9] J. E. Huheey, E. Keiter, R. L. Keiter, Chimie Inorganique, De
´
Boeck Universite, ParisϪBruxell 1996, p. 546.
0.20 x 0.20 x 0.10
0.30 x 0.30 x 0.20
2.42 to 26.99°
Ϫ13 Յ h Յ 13,
Ϫ16 Յ k Յ 11,
Ϫ15 Յ l Յ 18
10024
[10] G. Marangoni, B. Pitteri, V. Bertolasi, P. Gilli, Inorg. Chim.
Acta 1995, 234, 173; B. Pitteri, G. Marangoni, L. Cattalini, L
Canovese, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1994, 169.
[11] P. Biscarini, L. Fusina, G. D. Nivellini, Inorg. Chem. 1971,
10, 2564.
Ϫ17 Յ h Յ 17,
0 Յ k Յ 23,
0 Յ l Յ 10
4517
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
4517
4136
[12] A. R. Sanger, Can. J. Chem. 1984, 62, 822.
[R(int) ϭ 0.0412]
Full-matrix
least-squares on F2
4136 / 0 / 217
1.025
Refinement method
Full-matrix
[13] An extreme long averagedHg-S bonding interaction of
317.2 pm of HgCl2 inside the cavity of an unsaturated 18-
membered thiacrown ether (hexagonal bipyramidal coordi-
nation) has been recently reported: T. Tsuchiya, T. Shimizu,
K. Hirabayashi, N. Kamigata, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3480.
[14] F. Cecconi, C. A. Ghilardi, S. Midollini, A. Orlandini, Inorg.
Chim. Acta 1998, 269, 274.
least-squares on F2
Data / restraints / parameters 4517 / 0 / 289
Goodness-of-fit on F2
1.063
Final R indices [I>2sigma(I)] R1 ϭ 0.0650,
wR2 ϭ 0.1593
R indices (all data)
R1 ϭ 0.0342,
wR2 ϭ 0.0899
R1 ϭ 0.0378,
wR2 ϭ 0.0932
R1 ϭ 0.0712,
wR2 ϭ 0.1658
2.657 and Ϫ1.875 e.A 1.544 and Ϫ2.860 e.A
Ϫ3
Ϫ3
˚ ˚
Largest diff. peak and hole
[15] M. L. Helm, C. M. Combs, D. G. VanDerveer, G. J. Grant,
Inorg. Chim. Acta 2002, 338, 182.
[16] for coordination of (1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25-octathiacyclooctaco-
sane) on HgBr2 see: A . J. Blake, W.-S. Li, V. Lippolis, A.
Taylor, M. Schröder, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1998, 2931.
[17] M. Herceg, D. Matkovic-Calogovic, Acta Cryst. 1992, C48,
1779.
grams SHELXS-90 and SHELXL-97. The crystallographic data for
each complex are given in Tables 3 and 4. The figures were drawn
using CrystalMaker for Mac 6.35.
Crystallographic data for the structural analysis have been de-
posited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC
Nos CCDC 239987 Ϫ 239991 for compounds 2a-c, 3 and 4. Copies
of this information may be obtained free of charge from: The direc-
tor, CCDC, Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 IEZ, UK (Fax: ϩ44-
1223-336033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk or www: http://
www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk)
[18] R. Damrauer, R. Simon, A. Lapoterie, G. Manuel, Y. T. Park,
W. P. Weber, J. Organomet. Chem. 1990, 391, 7.
[19] C. Eaborn, K. Kundu, A. Pidcock, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 1981, 933.
˚
[20] P. Kapoor, V. Kukuskin, K. Lövqvist, A. Oskarsson, Y. T.
Park, W. P. Weber, J. Organomet. Chem. 1996, 517, 71.
[21] C. Strohmann, S. Lüdtke, O. Ulbrich, Organometallics 2000,
19, 4223; C. Strohmann, D. Schildknecht, in: The Chemistry
of Organolithium Compounds, Z. Rappoport, I. Marek (eds.),
John Wiley Sons Ltd., Chichester 2004, p. 941.
[22] for recent work on the coodination ability of the related ligand
system (RSCH2)3SiMe see: W. C. Blackwell, D. Bunich, T. E.
Concolino, A. L. Rheingold, D. Rabinovich, Inorg. Chem.
Commun. 2000, 3, 325; H. W. Yim, K.-C Lam, A. L. Rheing-
old, D. Rabinovich, Polyhedron 2000, 19, 849; H. W. Yim, D.
Rabinovich K.-C Lam, J. A. Golen, A. L. Rheingold, Acta
Crystallogr. 2003, E59, m556.
Acknowledgements. We are grateful to the Deutschen Forschungsge-
meinschaft (DFG), the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (FCI) and
`
the French Ministere de la Recherche et Technologie for financial
support. Furthermore we acknowledge Wacker-Chemie GmbH for
providing us with fine chemicals.
References
[1] E. W. Abel, S. K. Bhargava, K. G. Orrell, Progr. Inorg. Chem.
1984, 32, 1.
[23] C. Strohmann, S. Lüdtke, E. Wack, Chem. Ber. 1996, 129, 799.
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2004, 630, 1955Ϫ1961
zaac.wiley-vch.de
2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim
1961