Q. Yu et al.
Food and Chemical Toxicology 149 (2021) 112032
3:1:1:1:1. That also indicated the three terminal Glc were coincident.
Six residues of CT70-1B were present, including 1,5-di-O-acetyl-
2,3,4,6-tetra-O-methyl-D-glucitol, 1,2,3,5,6-penta-O-acetyl-4-O-methyl-
D-glucitol, 1,2,4-tri-O-acetyl-3,5-di-O-methyl-L-arabinitol, 1,5,6-tri-O-
acetyl-2,3,4-tri-O-methyl-D-galactitol, 1,3,5,6-tetra-O-acetyl-2,4-di-O-
methyl-D-mannitol, and 1,4-di-O-acetyl-2,3,5-tri-O-methyl-L-arabinitol.
These results indicate that the main residue linkages of CT70-1B were
Glcp-(1→, →2,3,6)-Glcp-(1→, →2)-Araf-(1→, →6)-Galp-(1→, →3,6)-
Manp-(1→ and Araf-(1 → .
Five residues of CT70-2 were identified, including 1,5-di-O-acetyl-
2,3,4,6-tetra-O-methyl-D-glucitol,
1,4,5-tri-O-acethyl-2,3,6-tri-O-
methyl-D-glucitol,
1,4-di-O-acetyl-2,3,5-tri-O-methyl-L-arabinitol,
1,5,6-tri-O-acetyl-2,3,4-tri-O-methyl-D-galactitol and 1,3,5,6-tetra-O-
acetyl-2,4-di-O-methyl-D-mannitol. These results indicate that the main
residue linkages of CT70-2 were Glcp-(1→, →4)-Glcp-(1→, Araf-(1→,
→6)-Galp-(1→ and →3,6)-Manp-(1 → .
Fig. 3. IR spectrum of CT70-1A.
3358 cmꢀ 1 (CT70-1B), and 3393 cmꢀ 1 (CT70-2) were matched the hy-
droxyl stretching vibration of oligosaccharides. The peaks around 2927
cmꢀ 1 (CT70-1A), 2933 cmꢀ 1 (CT70-1B), and 2927 cmꢀ 1 (CT70-2) were
corresponded to the C–H stretching vibration. A weak bands appeared at
1639 cmꢀ 1(CT70-1A), 1643 cmꢀ 1 (CT70-1B), and 1638 cmꢀ 1 (CT70-2)
were due to absorption of water, because of hygroscopic properties of
this oligosaccharide. The bands around 1036 cmꢀ 1(CT70-1A), 1026
cmꢀ 1 (CT70-1B), and 1035 cmꢀ 1 (CT70-2) were the characteristic peaks
of pyranose configuration of the oligosaccharides. In addition, the peak
at 938 cmꢀ 1 indicated the existence of the furan ring in CT70-2 (Wang
et al., 2017a; Albuquerque et al., 2014).
3.5. NMR spectra of Kunlun Chrysanthemum oligosaccharides
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of CT70-1A are shown in Fig. 4. In the
1H NMR spectrum, all chemical signals were distributed from 1.00 to
6.00 ppm. Those in the range of 4.00–6.00 ppm were associated with
anomeric protons. The
α and β configurations of the residues were
determined via the chemical shift and coupling constants of the
anomeric proton (Habibi et al., 2004). The 1H NMR data showed signals
at δH 4.41, 4.83, 5.04, and 5.36 ppm, which were attributed to charac-
teristic anomeric proton signals. An examination of the 13C NMR data
disclosed five anomeric carbon signals at δC 92.4, 100.1, 102.2, 103.1,
and 108.3 ppm, which substantiated that there were five residues in
CT70-1A. The result was consistent with the result of GC-MS. In the
HSQC spectra (Fig. 4C), we observed the correlations of 5.36 with 92.4,
5.36 with 108.3, 5.04 with 102.2, 4.83 with 100.1, and 4.41 with 103.1.
Comprehensive analyses of 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HSQC spectra and
GC-MC suggested that the glycosidic linkages were followed by
3.4. Methylation and GC-MS analysis
GC-MS analysis was performed to identify linkages in the sugar
residue. The methylated oligosaccharides were acid hydrolyzed and
acetylated prior to GC-MS analysis. Mass spectrum of methylated sugar
residues are shown in Figs. S7–S9. The results of methylation analysis by
GC-MS are shown in Table 1 and Tables S1–S2. Five residues of CT70-1A
were identified, including 1,5-di-O-acetyl-2,3,4,6-tetra-O-methyl-D-
glucitol, 1,2,4-tri-O-acetyl-3,5-di-O-methyl-L-arabinitol, 1,5,6-tri-O-
acetyl-2,3,4-tri-O-methyl-D-galactitol, 1,3,5,6-tetra-O-acetyl-2,4-di-O-
methyl-D-mannitol, and 1,5,6-tri-O-acetyl-2,3,4-tri-O-methyl-D-gluci-
tol. These results indicate that CT70-1A may be composed of Glcp-(1→,
→2)-Araf-(1→, →6)-Galp-(1→, →3,6)-Manp-(1→ and →6)-Glcp-(1→ at a
ratio of 11.34:4.21:3.05:4.93:4.01, respectively, which was about
(1→)-linked
α
-D-glucose, (1 → 2)-linked
α-L-arabinose, (1 → 6)-linked
β-D-galactose, (1 → 6)-linked
α
-D-glucose and (1 → 3, 6)-linked
β-D-mannose (Dertli et al., 2017; Sahragard and Jahanbin, 2017; Zhao
et al., 2017; Li et al., 2017). Furthermore, based on the correlations of
HMBC spectrum, the H2/C2, H3/C3, H4/C4, H5/C5, and H6/C6
chemical shifts of each residue were defined. Thus, the combined 1H,
13C, HSQC, and methylation data, along with data from the literature
(Wang et al., 2009; Westphal et al., 2010; Pattanayak et al., 2015; Guo
et al., 2015b), led to complete descriptions of the residues of CT70-1A
(Table 2).
The HMBC spectra showed cross-peaks in different residues, con-
firming the linkage sites and sequences among residues. Fig. 4D shows
cross-peaks that could be assigned as follows: H1 (5.36 ppm) of residue
A and C2 (84.0 ppm) of residue B (AH1/BC2), suggesting that the C-2 of
residue B was linked to the O-1 of residue A. The cross-peaks of 4.03/
108.3 ppm (DH3/BC1), 3.45/102.2 ppm (DH6/EC1), 5.36/72.3 ppm
(AH1/FC6), 4.83/72.1 ppm (FH1/EC6), and 5.36/103.1 ppm (AH1/
DC1) suggest that the C-1 of residue B was linked to the O-3 of residue D,
the C-1 of residue E was linked to the O-6 of residue D, the C-6 of residue
F was linked to the O-1 of residue A, the C-6 of residue E was linked to
the O-1 of residue F, and the C-1 of residue D was linked to the O-1 of
residue A.
Table 1
GC-MS data of the methylated products of CT70-1A.
PMAA
Molar
ratio
Mass fragments (m/z)
Linkage
1,5-di-O-acetyl-
2,3,4,6-tetra-
O-methyl-D-
glucitol
11.34
4.21
3.05
4.93
4.01
43,57,71,87,101,118,129,145,162
Glcp-(1→
1,2,4-tri-O-
acetyl-3,5-di-
O-methyl-L-
arabinitol
43,57,87,101,111,129,146,161
→2)-
Araf-(1→
1,5,6-tri-O-
acetyl-2,3,4-
tri-O-methyl-
D-galactitol
1,3,5,6-tetra-O-
acetyl-2,4-di-
O-methyl-D-
mannitol
43,57,87,99,101,117,129,169,189
43,57,87,101,117,129,139,189,234
43,57,71,99,101,117,129,143,161,173
→6)-
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of CT70-1B are shown in Fig. S10. The
1H NMR data show the characteristic anomeric proton signals at δH 4.41,
4.36, 4.84, 5.16, and 5.36 ppm. An examination of the 13C NMR data
Galp-(1→
→3,6)-
Manp-
(1→
disclosed six anomeric carbon signals at δ 92.4, 99.7, 103.0, 103.2,
C
108.6, and 109.4 ppm, which indicated that there were six residues in
CT70-1B. The result was consistent with the result of GC-MS. In the
HSQC spectra (Fig. S10C), we observed the correlations of 5.36 with
92.4, 5.36 with 108.6, 5.16 with 109.4, 4.84 with 99.7, 4.41 with 103.0
and 4.36 with 103.2. A comprehensive analysis of 1H NMR, 13C NMR,
HSQC spectra, and GC-MC suggested that the glycosidic linkages were
1,5,6-tri-O-
acetyl-2,3,4-
tri-O-methyl-
D-glucitol
→6)-
Glcp-(1→
5