C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Catalytic Redox Amidations of Enals
forming a known, metastable hemiaminal 3 that acts as an in situ
protecting group;15 (2) a role in promoting the decomposition of
the imine to the aldehyde and amine substrates;16 and (3) a tandem
catalysis approach via chemoselective reaction of the acyl triazolium
activated carboxylate with imidazole, leading to an acyl imidazolium
species that is eventually converted to the desired amide product.
Given the previous failures of nitrogen-based nucleophiles to
participate in these redox-type reactions,17 we initially favored for
imidazole a role as a transient aldehyde-protecting group. However,
exposure of formyl cyclopropane 1 to imidazole, without precatalyst
1, in either the presence or absence of DBU led to no observable
reactions by NMR analysis (Scheme 1). Upon addition of benzyl
amine, in the absence of 1, imine formation occurred readily,
discounting a role for imidazole in suppressing or reversing imine
formation. In contrast, when 2, imidazole, precatalyst 1, and DBU
were combined in the absence of benzyl amine, the aldehyde was
quickly consumed and new product formed. Analysis by 1H NMR
(see Supporting Information) identified this species as the acyl
imidazole 5. Treatment of this intermediate with amines or alcohols
leads cleanly to amide or esters products, respectively.
In summary, we have documented a straightforward solution to
the seemingly intractable problem of competing imine formation
in the NHC-catalyzed redox amidation of R-functionalized alde-
hydes. These studies provide a valuable addition to ongoing efforts
on developing catalytic, stereoselective, and atom-economical
approaches to carboxylic acid derivatives.
a Conditions: 1 equiv of aldehyde, 1.1 equiv of imidazole, 5 mol % of
1 and 20 mol % of DIPEA amine at 40 °C for 20 min prior to addition of
1.2 equiv of amine at rt, 15 h. b Amine added after 15 h, and rxn stirred at
rt for 1 h. c With 1 equiv of DIPEA employed. d Isolated yield after
chromatography.
Acknowledgment. Support for this work was provided by the
National Science Foundation (CHE-0449587). Unrestricted support
from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, and
Bristol Myers Squibb is gratefully acknowledged. J.W.B. is a fellow
of the Packard Foundation, the Beckman Foundation, the Sloan
Foundation, and a Cottrell Scholar. We thank Justin Struble for
catalyst preparation. We thank Prof. Tomislav Rovis for a personal
communication of related results.
Scheme 1. Consideration of Reaction Pathways in Imidazole-
Promoted Redox Amidation of R-Functionalized Aldehydes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
characterization data for all compounds. This material is available free
References
(1) For recent progress, see: (a) Maki, T.; Ishihara, K.; Yamamoto, H. Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 5043-5046. (b) Gunanathan, C.; Ben-David, Y.; Milstein,
D. Science 2007, 317, 790-792. (c) Yoo, W.-J.; Li, C.-J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 13064-13065.
(2) Bode, J. W. Curr. Opin. Drug DiscoVery DeV. 2006, 9, 765-775.
(3) (a) Bode, J. W.; Fox, R. M.; Baucom, K. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 1248-1252. (b) Carrillo, N.; Davalos, E. A.; Russak, J. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1452-1453.
(4) Zeitler, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7506-7510.
(5) Chow, K. Y.-K.; Bode, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8126-8127.
(6) (a) Reynolds, N. T.; Read de Alaniz, J.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 9518-9519. (b) Reynold, N. T.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 16406-16407.
the NHC catalyst,13 afforded the amide product in good yield with-
out competing reactions (Table 2, entries 1 and 2).
(7) (a) Sohn, S. S.; Bode, J. W. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3873-3876. (b) Chan,
A.; Scheidt, K. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 905-908.
(8) Zeitler, K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 637-640.
Unlike other classes of R-functionalized aldehydes, including
R-halo- and R,â-epoxyaldehydes, R,â-unsaturated aldehydes are less
reactive and their redox reactions can be complicated by competing
lactone-forming dimerization reactions.14 However, their wide
availability and relative stability renders them the most attractive
class of acyl donors. We were therefore pleased to identify
conditions suitable for direct redox amidations of enals, again using
imidazole as an essential, inexpensive, promoter (Table 2). Con-
sistent with our previous studies, the use of Hu¨nig’s base, rather
than DBU, was critical to the success of the reaction.
The ability of imidazole and related N-heterocycles to facilitate
the catalytic amidation reaction raises several mechanistic questions,
particularly, in light of the failure, in the case of formyl cyclopro-
panes, of other common additives to successfully promote the
amidations. Initially, we considered three explanations for the role
of imidazole: (1) rapid reaction of imidazole with the aldehyde,
(9) Sohn, S. S.; Bode, J. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6021-6024.
(10) (a) Li, G.-Q.; Li, Y.; Dai, L.-X.; You, S.-L. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3519-
3521. (b) Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Redondo, M. C. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
1765-1767.
(11) Acyl azolium salts appear to exhibit an inherent preference to nucleophilic
substitution reactions with oxygen and sulfur nucleophiles; see: Movas-
saghi, M.; Schmidt, M. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2453-2456.
(12) Contemporaneously, Rovis has reported a similar redox amidation utilizing
HOAt as a promoter: Vora, H. U.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, in press.
(13) He, M.; Uc, G. J.; Bode, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15088-
15089.
(14) (a) Sohn, S. S.; Rosen, E. L.; Bode, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
14370-14371. (b) Burstein, C.; Glorius, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 6205-6208. (c) Burstein, C.; Tschan, S.; Xie, X.; Glorius, F. Synthesis
2006, 2418-2439.
(15) Dixon, D. J.; Scott, M. S.; Luckhurst, C. A. Synthesis 2003, 2317-2320.
(16) Dirksen, A.; Hackeng, T. M.; Dawson, P. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 7581-7584.
(17) For the only two exceptions, see examples cited in refs 6a and 7b.
JA0768136
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 45, 2007 13799