281
with 75 L of 0.05 kg/dm3 phenol solution on an ice bed and sul-
phuric acid (375 L) was then added. The mixtures were incubated
at 80 ◦C for 30 min and absorbance was measured at 495 nm using a
spectrophotometer (Spectamax M5, Moleular Devices, USA). Mal-
tose was used as a standard.
Uronic acid content was determined using the method as
described by Blumenkrantz and Asboe-Hansen [29]. Crude polysac-
charide (250 L) at concentration of 1 mg/mL was mixed with
1.5 mL of 0.0125 mol/dm3 sulphuric acid/sodium tetraborate
solution on an ice bed and then heated at 100 ◦C for 5 min m-
Hydroxydiphenyl (25 L) was then added and the absorbance was
measured after 5 min at 520 nm using a spectrophotometer (Spec-
tamax M5, Moleular Devices, USA).
to possess a higher anticoagulant activity than those of heparin [20]
whereas galactoglucomannans and pectins from woody materials
have also been reported to exhibit immunostimulating and free
radicals scavenging activities [21,22]. Several studies have reported
the possibility of using waste products as polysaccharide sources.
To date, polysaccharides have been extracted from several under
utilised biomasses, such as mango waste, sunflower head residues,
sugar beet, soy hull and sweet potato residues [23–25]. Nonethe-
less, not all sources are suitable for commercial uses. The sources as
well as their extraction and purification methodologies may affect
the structure and composition of the produced pectin. Therefore, a
continuous search for suitable pectin is aggressively performed by
researchers.
The main objective of this study was to explore the potential
of Pinto bean pod as an alternative source of polysaccharide. The
specific objectives of the study were to extract polysaccharide from
the pods of Pinto bean using various extraction parameters; and to
evaluate the molecular structure, chemical properties as well as the
biological activities of the extracted macromolecule carbohydrate.
2.5. Functional groups and degree of esterification (DE)
determinations
FTIR spectra of crude pectic-polysaccharide (powder form) were
recorded from 650 to 4000 cm−1 using Cary 670 FTIR spectrom-
eter with an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) system (Agilent
Technologies, CA, USA). The spectra were analysed using Agilent
Resolutions Pro software. DE was determined using the following
equation:
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
A1730
Fresh Pinto bean pods were collected from different markets
(∼10 kg from each market) in Penang. The pods were cleaned with
deionised water and were kept frozen at −20 ◦C. They were subse-
quently freeze-dried. The lyophilised pods were ground into fine
powder using a blender, sieved (30 Mesh) and stored at 4 ◦C prior
to extraction. All chemicals used in this study were of analytical
grade (Sigma-Aldrich, USA).
DE =
× 100
(1)
A1730 + A1600
where A1730 was defined as the area of the band at 1730 cm−1 and
A1600 was defined as the area of the band at 1600 cm−1 [30].
2.6. Determination of molecular weights
The molecular weight of PBPP was examined using a gel per-
meation chromatography (GPC) equipped with Viscotek Model
TDA 305 Triple Detector Array incorporated Refractive index, Light
scattering and viscosity detectors (Malvern, UK). CLM 3021 col-
umn (A6000 M, 300 × 7.8 mm, 13 m beads size, Malvern, UK) was
used. A 100 L of sample (0.01 kg/dm3) in 0.1 mol/dm3 NaNO3) was
injected and the flow rate and temperature were maintained at
1.0 mL/min and 30 ◦C, respectively. The elution was carried out with
0.1 mol/dm3 NaNO3 containing 0.003 kg/dm3 NaN3 to prevent bac-
teria growth. Polyethylene Oxide (18670 Da) was used as working
calibration standard. A second standard, dextran (65333 Da) was
applied to verify the calibration accuracy with high level of con-
fidence. The molecular weight of the sample was determined by
comparing with calibration curve. The chromatogram obtained was
analyzed using the OmniSEC software.
2.2. Crude polysaccharide extraction
Briefly, 6 g of lyophilised pod powders were added in 300 mL of
0.1 mol/dm3 citrate-phosphate buffer at different pH values (i.e. pH
2, pH 4 and pH 6) using solid to buffer ratio of 1:50. The mixture was
then incubated at different extraction durations (i.e. 1 h, 3 h and 5 h)
in an incubator shaker (IKA KS 4000i Control, Staufen, Germany)
which constantly shaking at 250 rpm at different temperature set-
tings (i.e. 50 ◦C, 60 ◦C and 70 ◦C). The resulting slurries were then
filtered through a muslin cloth (2 layers) to remove solid particles.
Thereafter, three volumes of ethanol were added to one volume of
extract and incubated at 4 ◦C for 5 h to precipitate polysaccharide.
The precipitates obtained were filtered through a muslin cloth and
then washed with ethanol to remove the small molecular weight
molecules in the extract. The crude polysaccharide (PBPP) was then
lyophilised and stored in a desiccator prior to analysis. The PBPP
yield was expressed in g/100 g (w/w, dry basis).
2.7. Determination of monosaccharide composition
2.3. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis
Monosaccharides composition was determined using the
method of Lv et al. [31] using a high performance liquid chro-
matography (HPLC) system equipped with an UV detector. Sample
(10 mg) was hydrolyze using 3 mol/dm3 trifluoroacetic acid (1 mL)
at 95 ◦C for 8 h, vacuum dried and re-dissolved in 1 mL of deionized
water. Sample (100 L) was then added with 3-methyl-1-phenyl-
2-pyrazoline-5-one (PMP, 200 L) and 0.3 mol/dm3 NaOH (300 L)
followed by incubation at 70 ◦C for 1 h. HCl (300 L, 0.3 mol/dm3)
was then added and the resulting solution was extracted with
1 mL of chloroform for 3 times. The aqueous layer was collected
and filtered through a 0.45 m membrane prior to HPLC analysis.
The HPLC system was prepared as the following condition: Zor-
bax SB-C18 reversed-phase column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 m, Agilent,
USA). Mobile phase: (A) Acetonitrile; (B) 3.3 mmol/dm3 KH2PO4-
3.9 mmol/dm3 Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer containing 0.10 kg/dm3
ACN. The gradient: 0–4 min: 94% B; 4–9 min: from 94% to 88%B;
Samples were mounted onto SEM specimen stub with a double-
sided tape and coated with gold using a Polaron SC 515 Sputter
Coater (Fisons Instruments, UK). Subsequently, the samples were
photographed using Leo Supra 50VP Field Emission Scanning Elec-
tron Microscope equipped with Oxford INCA 400 energy dispersive
X-ray Microanalysis system (Oxford Instruments Analytical, UK).
Protein content of PBPP was determined using Bradford method
[26], lipid content was determined using Soxhlet method [27] and
total carbohydrate content was determined using the method as
described by Dubois et al. [28]. Sample (75 L, 1 mg/mL) was mixed