Phenylsulfanyl Oxiranyl Ethanones
2381
TABLE II 1H and 13C NMR Data of 4-Aryl-3-(phenylsulfanyl)-3-buten-2-ones
1
1
a
1H-NMR [CDCl3/TMS, δ (ppm)]
13C-NMR [CDCl3/TMS, δ (ppm)]
2.33 (s, 3H), 7.14–7.85 (m, 10H), 7.94 27.6, 126.3, 127.7, 128.3, 129.3, 130.1,
(s, 1H)
130.8, 132.2, 134.1, 135.2, 144.2, 198.9
27.3, 126.3, 127.5, 128.3, 129.2, 131.8,
132.4, 132.6, 134.6, 135.7, 42.3, 198.2
21.5, 27.6, 126.2, 127.5, 128.7, 129.1, 129.3,
131.1, 131.4, 135.5, 140.8, 144.9, 199.1
27.6, 115.4, 115.7, 126.5, 127.5, 127.6,
129.0, 129.5, 133.0, 133.2, 135.0, 137.2,
143.2, 198.9
b
c
2.16 (s, 3H), 6.93–7.59 (m, 9H), 7.62
(s, 1H)
2.20 (s, 6H), 6.83–7.68 (m, 9H), 7.84
(s, 1H)
2.34 (s, 3H), 6.87–7.90 (m, 9H), 7.91
(s, 1H)
d
e
f
2.24 (s, 3H), 7.15–8.18 (m, 9H), 7.72
(s, 1H)
2.28 (s, 3H), 7.04–7.86 (m, 9H), 7.98
(s, 1H)
27.8, 123.3, 126.9, 127.2, 128.4, 128.9,
129.5, 130.9, 136.7, 139.3, 147.5, 198.4
27.6, 126.3, 126.6, 127.4, 128.1, 129.4,
129.4, 130.6, 130.7, 132.9, 134.8, 135.9,
140.5, 198.2
g
h
i
2.27 (s, 3H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 7.02–7.74
(m, 9H), 7.98 (s, 1H)
20.1, 27.7, 125.5, 126.3, 127.8, 129.1, 129.3,
129.5, 130.1, 131.6, 133.6, 134.3, 135.5,
143.0, 203.6
27.5, 55.5, 110.4, 119.9, 126.0, 127.5, 129.2,
130.2, 131.5, 132.5, 135.8, 137.1, 140.4,
158.3, 190.4
2.35 (s, 3H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 6.84–8.02
(m, 9H), 8.27 (s, 1H)
2.29 (s, 3H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 6.93–7.79
(m, 9H), 7.94 (s, 1H)
27.6, 55.4, 113.9, 126.1, 127.2, 127.4, 129.0,
129.3, 129.9, 133.3, 145.4, 164.6, 199.2
or in benzene with azeotropic removal of water,6 or in chloroform.7 The
shorter reaction time and the enhanced yield of 1 in the present study
could probably arise from the role of piperidinium acetate functioning
in concert as (1) a base (OAc−) leading to the formation of enolate ion
from the 1-(phenylsulfanyl)acetone, or (2) as an acid (piperidinium ion)
enhancing the electrophilicity of the aldehyde. The NMR spectroscopic
data of the butenones 1 are presented in Table II.
The 1-(phenylsulfanyl)acetone required for the present study, in
turn, was obtained by the reaction of chloroacetone with benzenethiol in
methanol in the absence of any added base in an excellent yield of 95%,
while the literature yields in presence of sodium hydroxide or pyridine
were much lower, 53 and 64%, respectively.8
Epoxidation was affected by reacting 1 with hydrogen peroxide in a
1:1 molar ratio in tetrahydrofuran (THF) in presence of sodium hydrox-
ide at room temperature (Scheme 1). Monitoring the reaction by thin
layer chromatography (TLC) helped in optimizing the reaction time
(Table III). Reactions performed for longer durations led to a mixture
of products, suggesting further reactions of the oxiranes.