is due to the rapid acceleration of ring expansion to unstable
tropanes observed with this substrate, making halting the
reaction at the azabicycloheptane stage difficult. For all
substrates, only one diastereoisomer of 7 was observed, exo
with respect to the aldehyde substituent, despite precursors
6 being diastereoisomeric mixtures. Substrates 6c and 6d
(entries 3 and 4) demonstrate that the reaction is stereo-
specific with respect to olefin geometry in 6, because they
exclusively afforded products 7c and 7d, respectively.
Substrate 6g, possessing a cyclic alkenyl fragment, failed to
rearrange, giving a complex product mixture (entry 7).
Formation of tropanes 8 or 9 (Table 3) was also tolerant
of substituent X being changed from phenyl to methyl
(entries 2-4). However, employing an unsubstituted vinyl
group (entry 5) halted the reaction at azabicycloheptane 7e
as previously described. Given that ring expansion to
tropanes 8/9 is observed to be a slower process than
formation of 7, this result is not altogether surprising in view
of the already slow rate of azabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane forma-
tion observed with this substrate. Olefin geometrical isomers
6c and 6d again produced different isomeric tropane products
(entries 3 and 4). This is the expected outcome of the
proposed ring expansion mechanism for isomerization of 7
to 8/9 (Scheme 4): connectivity of the bicyclic ring system
is maintained throughout, maintaining the syn or anti
disposition of substituents Y/Z relative to the nitrogen bridge.
(Proposed structures for 8c, 9c, and 8d are corroborated by
key spectral features. See Supporting Information for details.)
The complete diastereoselectivity and stereospecificity
(with regard to alkene geometry) of formation of products 7
prompted us to consider alternative mechanistic explanations
for their generation. Two pathways were prominent in our
consideration (Scheme 5): an aza-Cope-Mannich process
Table 3.
entry
substrate
yield 8 (%)
yield 9 (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6a
6b
6c
6d
6e
60
37
49
42
0a
16
17
trace
0
0
a No ring expansion observed after formation of 7e as outlined in Table
2.
was obtained. 8a and 9a proved to be readily separable by
chromatography. It was demonstrated that these tropanes
arose via the intermediacy of azabicycloheptane 7a: a pure
sample of 7a was resubjected to the reaction conditions and
smoothly isomerized to the ring-expanded system. This novel
interconversion of the two ring systems can be postulated
to be mechanistically analogous (Scheme 4) to the recently
Scheme 4
Scheme 5
observed carbocyclic variant reported by Davies et al.9 The
ca. 4:1 isolated ratio of 8a:9a partly reflects epimerization
during chromatography; the initial ratio according to NMR
analysis of the crude reaction mixture was close to 1:1.
With preferred reaction conditions identified to access
either the [2.2.1] or expanded [3.2.1] ring systems, we
synthesized a range of alternative rearrangement precursors
6 (Tables 2 and 3). We hoped to probe the generality of the
rearrangement and to shed further light on the mechanisms
of conversion to products 7-9. The strategy employed for
preparation of 6b-g was again addition of the appropriate
vinyl Grignard reagent to aldehyde 5a.
With respect to the formation of azabicycloheptanes 7
(Table 2), replacement of the phenyl vinyl substituent of 6a
with an aliphatic group (methyl) is well tolerated (entries
2-4). However, the presence of an unsubstituted vinyl group
(entry 5) dramatically slowed the formation of 7e. The low
yield of 7f from electron-rich vinyl compound 6f (entry 6)
as originally planned (pathway I) and an aza-Prins-pinacol
reaction (pathway II). In pathway II, the carbocation
intermediate B must undergo rapid pinacol rearrangement
to give the more strained [2.2.1]azabicycle 7 as the kinetic
product; prolonged exposure to Lewis acid would lead to
the thermodynamically more stable, less strained [3.2.1]-
system 8/9 via reversion to B and H-migration/enol formation
(cf. Scheme 4). In both pathways I and II, the observed exo
(8) Overman, L. E.; Kakimoto, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 1310.
For a review, see: Overman, L. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 352-359.
(9) Davies, H. M. L.; Dai, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2692-
2693. Niess, B.; Hoffmann, H. M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
26-29.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 7, 2005
1337