C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
116, 882-893 (iron). (b) Donkervoort, J. G.; Vicario, J. L.; Jastrzebski,
J. T. B. H.; Gossage, R. A.; Cahiez, G.; van Koten, G. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1998, 558, 61-69 (copper). (c) Tsuji, T.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima,
K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4137-4139 (cobalt). (d) Nakamura,
M.; Matsuo, K.; Ito, S.; Nakamura, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3686-
3687 (iron). (e) Nagano, T.; Hayashi, T. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1297-1299
(iron). (f) Martin, R.; Fu¨rstner, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3955-
3957 (iron).
(3) For nickel-catalyzed couplings, see: (a) (organozinc reagents) Zhou, J.;
Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14726-14727. (b) (organoboron
reagents) Zhou, J.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1340-1341.
(c) (organosilicon reagents) Powell, D. A.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 7788-7789. (d) (organotin reagents) Powell, D. A.; Maki, T.;
Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 510-511.
(4) For examples of other types of metal-catalyzed asymmetric cross-coupling
processes, see: (a) Hayashi, T. In ComprehensiVe Asymmetric Catalysis;
Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer: New York,
1999; Chapter 25. (b) Yin, J.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 12051-12052. (c) Shimada, T.; Cho, Y.-H.; Hayashi, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 13396-13397. (d) Hamada, T.; Chieffi, A.; Åhman, J.;
Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1261-1268. (e) Willis,
M. C.; Powell, L. H. W.; Claverie, C. K.; Watson, S. J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1249-1251.
(5) For reviews of applications of oxazoline-based chiral ligands, including
pybox, in asymmetric catalysis, see: (a) McManus, H. A.; Guiry, P. J.
Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 4151-4202. (b) Nishiyama, H. In AdVances in
Catalytic Processes; Doyle, M. P., Ed.; JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1997;
Volume 2, pp 153-188.
(6) Notes: (a) NiCl2‚glyme, unlike Ni(cod)2, is air-stable; both are com-
mercially available. NiBr2‚diglyme and NiCl2‚diglyme can also be used,
although they are somewhat less effective. (b) (i-Pr)-Pybox, unlike (s-
Bu)-Pybox, is commercially available. (c) We have not been able to
employ commercially available HexZnBr (Aldrich) in this process. We
recommend that pure organozinc reagents be prepared from the corre-
sponding alkyl bromides according to the straightforward procedure of
Huo: Huo, S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 423-425. (d) At room temperature, the
product is generated in 91% ee. At -20 °C, the cross-coupling process is
slow.
(7) General Procedure for Table 1: In the air (no special precautions are
necessary), a 10 mL Schlenk flask was charged with NiCl2‚glyme (22.0
mg, 0.100 mmol), (R)-(i-Pr)-Pybox (39.2 mg, 0.130 mmol), and the
R-bromo amide (1.00 mmol). The flask was purged with argon for 5 min,
and then DMI (2.2 mL) and THF (0.5 mL) were added. The resulting
orange solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min, and then the
flask was placed into a 0 °C bath. The reaction mixture was stirred for 10
min, and then the organozinc reagent (1.0 M in DMI; 1.3 mL, 1.3 mmol)
was added. The resulting dark-brown reaction mixture was stirred for 12
h at 0 °C. Then, the excess organozinc reagent was quenched by the
addition of ethanol (0.5 mL), and the brown mixture was passed through
a plug of silica gel (eluted with Et2O) to remove inorganic salts and most
of the DMI. The filtrate was concentrated, and the resulting orange oil
was purified by flash chromatography.
(8) Notes: (a) The yield of the reaction is sensitive to the steric demand of
the coupling partners. Thus, we have not been able to efficiently cross-
couple a secondary organozinc reagent or an R-isopropyl-R-bromo amide.
(b) Under the standard conditions, benzylzinc reagents are not suitable
substrates. (c) For the cross-coupling illustrated in entry 1 of Table 1,
when the reaction is run on a 10 mmol scale, we obtain the product in
88% yield (3.0 g) and 95% ee. (d) The process is not highly sensitive to
oxygen or moisture; when we conduct a coupling under air in a closed
vial with 1.6 equiv of the organozinc reagent, we obtain essentially
identical yield and enantiomeric excess. (e) Under identical conditions,
R-bromoesters furnish lower yield and lower enantiomeric excess.
(9) Anderson, T. J.; Jones, G. D.; Vicic, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
8100-8101.
tion may proceed via radical-radical coupling.9 In view of the high
enantioselectivity that we observe under the conditions described
in eq 1, we believe that for this system the Vicic mechanism is
unlikely to be operative.
In conclusion, we have developed the first method that achieves
catalytic asymmetric cross-couplings of alkyl electrophiles. These
Ni/(i-Pr)-Pybox-catalyzed reactions of secondary R-bromo amides
with organozinc reagents are tolerant of an array of functional
groups and generally proceed in good yield and in high enantiomeric
excess. This advance further highlights the potential impact of cross-
couplings of alkyl electrophiles on synthetic organic chemistry.
Acknowledgment. This paper is dedicated to our colleague,
Prof. Richard R. Schrock, on the occasion of his 60th birthday.
Support has been provided by the National Institutes of Health
(National Institute of General Medical Sciences, R01-GM62871),
the German Academic Exchange Service (postdoctoral fellowship
to C.F.), Merck Research Laboratories, and Novartis. Funding for
the MIT Department of Chemistry Instrumentation Facility has been
furnished in part by the National Science Foundation (CHE-9808061
and DBI-9729592).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
compound characterization data (PDF). This material is available free
References
(1) For a recent review, see: Frisch, A. C.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 674-688.
(2) For pioneering studies of iron-, copper-, and cobalt-catalyzed couplings
of Grignard reagents, see: (a) Brinker, U. H.; Ko¨nig, L. Chem. Ber. 1983,
JA0506509
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 13, 2005 4595