6242 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 35, No. 21, 1996
Bormans et al.
Table 3. Selected Bond Lengths and Bond Angles
Bond Lengths (Å)
Tc1-O1
1.629(4)
1.957(5)
1.951(5)
1.941(5)
1.958(5)
Tc2-O2
1.665(4)
1.940(5)
1.939(5)
1.932(5)
1.953(5)
Tc1-N111
Tc1-N121
Tc1-N131
Tc1-N141
Tc2-N211
Tc2-N221
Tc2-N231
Tc2-N241
Bond Angles (deg)
80.4(3)
129.1(4)
78.9(3)
78.7(3)
129.3(4)
79.5(3)
115.6(4)
114.6(4)
115.3(4)
116.1(4)
N131-Tc1-N141
N121-Tc1-N141
N121-Tc1-N131
N111-Tc1-N141
N111-Tc1-N131
N111-Tc1-N121
O1-Tc1-N141
O1-Tc1-N131
O1-Tc1-N121
O1-Tc1-N111
N231-Tc2-N241
N221-Tc2-N241
N221-Tc2-N231
N211-Tc2-N241
N211-Tc2-N231
N211-Tc2-N221
O2-Tc2-N241
O2-Tc2-N231
O2-Tc2-N221
O2-Tc2-N211
79.7(3)
129.3(4)
80.2(3)
78.5(3)
129.3(4)
79.4(3)
115.8(4)
114.5(4)
114.9(4)
116.2(4)
Figure 2. HPLC chromatograms: (A) analysis of the labeling reaction
mixture of 99mTc-A4 with the presence of 99mTc-A4-A and 99mTc-A4-B
(radioactivity detection); (B) analysis immediately after the preparation
of 99Tc-A4 showing the presence of 99mTc-A4-A (radioactivity detec-
tion); (C) analysis of a sample of the crystals obtained from the 99Tc-
A4 preparation [(cyclotetra-L-alanyl)oxotechnetium(V)] exhibiting a
retention time identical to that of 99mTc-A4-B (UV detection 215 nm).
based on ψ scans were applied (program: EMPIR).9 Reflections were
measured in 10° intervals. The minimum and maximum transmission
values ranged from 0.601 to 0.732. The structure was solved by using
a combination of the Patterson method and direct methods on the
difference structure (program: DIRDIF).10 The model was refined on
F2 by full-matrix least-squares (program: SHELXL-93).11 Displace-
ment parameters were anisotropic for all non-hydrogen atoms. H-atoms
were located on ideal molecular geometries and refined by using a riding
model. Analysis of the final difference map revealed -0.68 e Å-3 as
the deepest hole and 0.70 e Å-3 as the highest peak. General
calculations were performed using PARST.12 The absolute configu-
ration was determined according to Flack.13
Final fractional coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement
parameters with estimated standard deviations (esd) of the (cyclotetra-
L-alanyl)oxotechnetium(V) anions are listed in Table 2. Table 3
contains selected bond lengths and bond angles. A complete report is
included in the supporting information.
of the reaction mixture immediately after preparation showed
the presence of only one compound with a retention time
identical to that of 99mTc-A4-A, obtained by labeling tetra-L-
alanine with technetium-99m in alkaline conditions (Figure 2).
HPLC analysis of the mixture was repeated 24 h after synthesis
and yielded a chromatogram that shows the presence of two
peaks, the retention times of which correspond to 99mTc-A4-A
and 99mTc-A4-B, respectively. The conversion of Tc-A4-A to
Tc-A4-B, which was observed on the technetium-99m scale,
also appeared to proceed for the carrier-added technetium-99
complex that was initially obtained. Subsequent HPLC analyses
showed that this conversion to Tc-A4-B proceeded further as a
function of time and was complete after 14 days.
Yellow crystals started to form about 20 days after synthesis,
and, as could be expected, the retention time on HPLC of the
crystallized compound was identical to that of 99mTc-A4-B
(Figure 2). Negative ion Fab mass spectroscopy of the crystal
surprisingly showed a molecular ion with a mass of 385 Da,
corresponding to a Tc complex in which an oxotechnetium core
is bound to the four amide nitrogen atoms of cyclic tetra-L-
alanine, of which four protons have been withdrawn [(cyclotetra-
L-alanyl)oxotechnetium(V)]. This structure was unexpected as
we were unsuccessful in previous attempts to chelate techne-
tium-99m with cyclic tetrapeptides.
Results and Discussion
99Tc pertechnetate was spiked with 99mTc to facilitate the
detection of any contaminations caused during handling and
synthesis and to enable radiometric detection with a NaI(Tl)
detector during HPLC analysis.
The technetium complex was synthesized in two steps with
an initial reduction of technetium(VII) pertechnetate to oxo-
technetium(V) tetrachloride in concentrated hydrochloric acid.5
Oxotechnetium(V) tetrachloride was isolated by precipitation
with tetraphenylarsonium chloride, and the salt was added to a
solution of the ligand tetra-L-alanine in sodium methanolate/
methanol. Previous experiments on the technetium-99m scale
indicated that complexation of technetium by tetrapeptides
proceeds with a higher yield in an alkaline environment.3
Accordingly, we used an alkaline solution to facilitate the
deprotonation of the amide groups, which is necessary for
chelation of technetium by tetra-L-alanine. The colloidal
precipitate of TcO2, which was also formed during this reaction,
was easily removed by filtration to yield a clear yellow solution,
the color typical for Tc(V) complexes.1,14-21 HPLC analysis
The structure derived from the results of mass spectroscopy
was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray analysis. An ORTEX22
plot is shown in Figure 3. The asymmetric unit consists of two
tetraphenylarsonium cations and two (cyclotetra-L-alanyl)-
oxotechnetium(V) anions. Apart from the peptide bond atoms,
the structure is pseudocentrosymmetric. The (cyclotetra-L-
alanyl)oxotechnetium(V) anions have a square pyramidal ar-
(9) EMPIR. Empirical absorption correction program. Version 1.2; Stoe
& Co.: Darmstadt, Germany, 1992.
(16) DePamphilis, B. V.; Jones, A. G.; Davis, M. A.; Davison, A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1978, 17, 5570.
(17) Kawashima, M.; Koyama, M.; Fujinaga, T. J. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem.
1976, 38, 801.
(18) Davison, A.; Orvig, C.; Trop, H.; Sohn, M.; DePamphilis, B. V.; Jones,
A. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 1988.
(19) Smith, J.; Byrne E.; Cotton, F.; Sekutowski, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1978, 16, 5570.
(10) Beurskens, P. T.; Admiraal, G.; Beurskens, G.; Bosman, W. P.; Garcia-
Granda, S.; Gould, R. O.; Smits, J. M.; Smykalla, C. The DIRDIF
program system, Technical Report of the Crystallography Laboratory;
University of Nijmegen: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1992.
(11) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL93. Program for Crystal Structure Refine-
ment; Univ. of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1993.
(12) Nardelli, M. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 7, 95.
(13) Flack, H. D. Acta Crystallogr. 1983, A39, 876.
(14) Jones, A.; Davison, A.; LaTegola, M.; Brodack, J.; Orvig, C.; et al. J.
Nucl. Med. 1982, 23, 801.
(15) Smith, J.; Byrne, E.; Cotton, F.; Sekutowski, J. Inorg. Chem. 1978,
17, 5571.
(20) Jurisson, S.; Schlemper E.; Troutner, D.; Canning, L.; Nowotnik, D.;
Neirinckx R. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 543.
(21) Rao, T. N.; Adhikesavalu, D.; Camerman, A.; Fritzberg, A. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5798.
(22) McArdle, P. ORTEX2.1b. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1994, 27, 438.