2396
M. Sani et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 2393–2396
CDCl3) d: ꢀ71.6 (d, 3F, J = 8.9 Hz); MS (DIS EI 70 eV)
m/z (%): 280 [M+] (15), 260 (20), 139 (100).
on a wider range of MMPs both in vitro and in vivo, in
order to have a more complete picture of the effect of
fluorine in this particular class of protease inhibitors.
10. To a stirred solution of 9 (0.41 mmol) in a MeOH/AcOEt
4:1 mixture (5 mL), a catalytic amount of Pd(OH)2/C was
added and the reaction mixture was kept vigorously
stirred under hydrogen atmosphere at rt for 1 h. The
palladium powder was filtered over Celite pad, washing
the dark solid with MeOH. The solvent was removed in
vacuo and the residue was purified byflash chromato-
Acknowledgements
We thank the European Commission (IHP Network
grant ÔFLUOR MMPIÕ HPRN-CT-2002-00181), MIUR
(Cofin 2004, Project ÔPolipeptidi Bioattivi e Nano-
strutturatiÕ), Politecnico di Milano and CNR for eco-
nomic support.
graphy(CHCl /MeOH, 95:5), affording 1 (74% yield): Rf:
3
1
0.36 (CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1); H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD)
d: 7.86 (d, 2H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.14 (d, 2H, J = 8.9 Hz), 4.62
(m, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 2.92 (dd, 1H, J = 16.2 and 5.9 Hz),
2.63 (dd, 1H, J = 16.2 and 6.1 Hz); 13C NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3, 305 K) d: 169.3, 168.9, 135.1, 132.9, 127.1 (q,
J = 279.1 Hz), 118.4, 66.7 (q, J = 28.1 Hz), 59.0, 31.1; 19F
NMR (235.3 MHz, CDCl3) d: ꢀ64.1 (d, 3F, J = 8.2 Hz);
MS (DIS EI 70 eV) m/z (%): 327 [M+] (3), 295 (12), 155
(100).
References and notes
1. (a) Whittaker, M.; Floyd, C. D.; Brown, P.; Gearing, A. J.
H. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2735–2776; (b) Bode, W.; Huber,
R. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1477, 241–252; (c)
Giavazzi, R.; Taraboletti, G. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hemat.
2001, 37, 53–60.
11. Evans, D. A.; Gage, J. R.; Leighton, J. L.; Kim, A. S. J.
Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1961–1963, and references cited
therein.
2. For a critical overview of the status and perspectives of the
clinical use of MMPs: Coussens, L. M.; Fingleton, B.;
Matrisian, L. M. Science 2002, 295, 2387–2392.
3. (a) Groneberg, R. D.; Burns, C. J.; Morrissette, M. M.;
Ullrich, J. W.; Morris, R. L.; Darnbrough, S.; Djuric, S.
W.; Condon, S. M.; McGeehan, G. M.; Labaudiniere, R.;
Neuenschwander, K.; Scotese, A. C.; Kline, J. A. J. Med.
Chem. 1999, 42, 541–544; (b) Salvino, J. M.; Mathew, R.;
Kiesow, T.; Narensingh, R.; Mason, H. J.; Dodd, A.;
Groneberg, R.; Burns, C. J.; McGeehan, G.; Kline, J.;
Orton, E.; Tang, S.-Y.; Morrissette, M.; Labaudiniere, R.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 1637–1640.
12. (a) Crimmins, M. T.; King, B. W.; Tabet, E. A.;
Chaudhary, K. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 894–902; (b)
Crimmins, M. T.; McDougall, P. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
591–594, and references cited therein; (c) Palomo, C.;
´
Oiarbide, M.; Garcıa, J. M. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 37–44.
13. Sani, M.; Belotti, D.; Giavazzi, R.; Panzeri, W.; Volon-
terio, A.; Zanda, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 1611–
1615, and references cited therein.
14. Under these conditions no intramolecular thia-Michael
addition byaction of the oxazolidinethione sulfur atom
was observed. For an overview of this process see:
´
Palomo, C.; Oiarbide, M.; Dias, F.; Lopez, R.; Linden,
4. Freskos, J. N.; Mischke, B. V.; DeCrescenzo, G. A.;
Heintz, R.; Getman, D. P.; Howard, S. C.; Kishore, N. N.;
McDonald, J. J.; Munie, G. E.; Rangwala, S.; Swearingen,
C. A.; Voliva, C.; Welsch, D. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
1999, 9, 943–948.
5. For a review see: Zanda, M. New J. Chem. 2004, 28, 1401–
1411.
6. Mikami, K.; Itoh, Y.; Yamanaka, M. Chem. Rev. 2004,
104, 1–16.
7. For a discussion of organic fluorine as hydron-bond
acceptor, see: (a) Carosati, E.; Sciabola, S.; Cruciani, G.
J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 5114–5125; (b) Dunitz, J. D.
ChemBioChem 2004, 5, 614–621.
8. For a recent example of thia-Michael reaction with
trifluorocrotonic esters, see: Karimova, N. M.; Glazkov,
A. A.; Ignatenko, A. V.; Kolomiets, A. F. Russ. Chem.
Bull. Int. Ed. 2003, 52, 1621–1622.
9. To a stirred solution of 6 (5.25 mmol) in DCM (10 mL)
thiol 3 (3.5 mmol) and Et3N (8.75 mmol) were added.
After stirring for 24 h the reaction mixture was washed
with a 1 M solution of HCl and then with a 5% aqueous
solution of NaHCO3. The aqueous solution was acidified
with a 1 M solution of HCl until pH 1–2 was reached and
then extracted with AcOEt. The organic layer was dried
over anhydrous Na2SO4 and the solvent was removed
A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 53, 3307–3310.
15. The absolute configuration of (S,S)-15 was confirmed on
the basis of the Flack parameter (x = 0.0329 (0.0284) for
the selected configuration and x = 1.0281 (0.0380) for the
opposite one): Flack, H. D. Acta Crystallogr. 1983, A39,
876–881, Full data (excluding structure factors) of the
crystal structure have been deposited with Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publica-
tion no. 263271. Copies of the data can be obtained, free
of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cam-
bridge, CB2 1EZ, UK [fax: +44(0)-1223-336033 or e-mail:
deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk].
16. Although the cleavage reaction of 15 was conducted under
strictlycontrolled conditions, it is likelythat competitive
oxidation of the sulfur atom byaction of hdyrogen
peroxide is responsible for the rather modest yields.
17. The following values were recorded bypolarimetric
analysis: (R)-1: ½a
23
D
ꢀ16.9 (c 0.88, EtOH); (S)-1:
23
D
½a þ16:1 (c 1.1, EtOH).
18. The catalytic domains of MMP-3 and MMP-9 enzymes
were produced in E. coli, transfected with cDNAs corre-
sponding to the respective human sequences. Proteins
were purified byaffinitychromatographyand the inhib-
itorypotencies of racemic 1 and single enantiomers were
assayed with synthetic, general MMP fluorescent substrate
(Mca-PLGLDpaAR, Tebu-bio) using a FL600 Avantec
fluorimeter. For MMP-3 see: (a) Ye, Q. Z.; Johnson, L.
L.; Hupe, D. J.; Baragi, V. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 11231–
11235; For MMP-9 see: (b) Ye, Q. Z.; Johnson, L. L.; Yu,
A. E.; Hupe, D. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 4702–4708.
19. The tests were reproduciblyrepeated several times on
chemicallypure compounds, therefore this result is
unlikelyto be an artifact.
in vacuo, affording pure 7 (64% yield): Rf: 0.40 (CHCl3/
23
D
MeOH, 9:1); ½a (R enantiomer) ꢀ5.6 (c 0.78, CHCl3);
23
D
½a (S enantiomer) +5.1 (c 1.1, CHCl3); 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) d: 10.7–9.20 (verybr s, 1H), 7.53 (d,
2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 6.88 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.77
(m, 1H), 2.94 (dd, 1H, J = 17.0 and 3.8 Hz), 2.69 (dd, 1H,
J = 17.0 and 10.6 Hz); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d:
175.4, 160.8, 137.1, 126.8 (q, J = 276.3 Hz), 121.6, 114.8,
55.3, 48.5 (q, J = 29.7 Hz), 34.1; 19F NMR (235.3 MHz,
20. We thank one of the referees for this suggestion.