Published on Web 10/19/2004
Large Structural Modification with Conserved Conformation: Analysis of
∆3-Fused Aryl Prolines in Model â-Turns
Guillaume Jeannotte and William D. Lubell*
De´partement de chimie, UniVersite´ de Montre´al, C.P. 6128, Succursale CentreVille, Montre´al,
Que´bec, Canada H3C 3J7
Received May 17, 2004; E-mail: lubell@chimie.umontreal.ca
Proline serves as a turn inducer in natural peptides and proteins
because of the pyrrolidine ring, which restricts motion about the φ
dihedral angle and reduces the energy difference between the prolyl
amide cis- and trans-isomers.1a Steric and stereoelectronic effects
of alkyl- and heteroatom-substituted prolines have thus been used
Figure 1. Representative unsaturated, aryl, and heteroaryl prolines.
Table 1. cis-Isomer N-terminal to Pro and PyPro (concn = 10 mM)
to induce specific conformations for studying factors that effect
prolyl peptide activity and biology.1 In contrast, ∆3-dehydroproline
1 acts as a conservative proline replacement in peptides and proteins.
For example, little conformational change was observed after the
replacement of Pro by 1 in a 14-residue cyclic analogue of
gramicidin S that exhibited a similarly stable â-sheet structure with
two type II′ â-turns, as shown by spectroscopic and computational
analysis.2 Moreover, replacement of Pro by 1 has provided peptide
and protein analogues with similar and improved biological
activities.3
% cis (±1%)
peptide
2:1 CD2Cl2/DMSO
DMSO
4a: Ac-D-Val-Pro-Gly-D-Leu-NMe2
4b: Ac-D-Val-PyPro-Gly-D-Leu-NMe2
5a: Ac-Leu-D-Phe-Pro-Val-NMe2
5b: Ac-Leu-D-Phe-PyPro-Val-NMe2
12
15
26
44
19
18
43
47
∆3-Fused arylprolines, such as 2, have yet to be examined in
peptides primarily because of the difficulties in their synthesis.4
Like 1, ∆3-fused arylprolines may serve as conservative proline
surrogates; moreover, structural modifications may be added without
influencing conformation. Recently, we introduced an effective
methodology for synthesizing enantiopure ∆3-fused pyrrol-prolines
(PyPro) of general structure 3 (Figure 1: R1, R2 ) H, alkyl; P )
protection).4 To examine the influence of the aryl moiety and
flattened pyrrolidine ring on conformation, Fmoc-PyPro 3 (R1 )
CH3, R2 ) H, P ) Fmoc) has now been introduced into peptides
4b and 5b for comparison with Pro in model â-turns, 4a and 5a,
respectively (Table 1). Peptides 4a and 4b were selected to examine
if PyPro would accommodate itself at the i + 1 position of a
â-hairpin because studies of the enantiomeric sequence of 4a have
shown that the D-Pro-Gly residue adopted the central position of a
â-hairpin.5 Peptides 5a and 5b, analogues of the â-turn portion of
gramicidin S, were synthesized to examine PyPro at the i + 2
position because spectroscopic analysis revealed a significant â-turn
population in a peptide related to 5a.6 Sequences 4 and 5, possessing
Pro and PyPro, were synthesized in solution and examined by NMR
spectroscopy to assess the influence of the pyrrole moiety on the
hydrogen-bonding network, the prolyl amide equilibrium, and the
turn conformation.
Peptides possessing Pro (4a and 5a) and PyPro (4b and 5b) were
synthesized in solution using NR-Boc and NR-Fmoc strategies,
respectively, as described in the Supporting Information (SI). The
NMR spectra of peptides 4 and 5 were measured in CD2Cl2 at
concentrations e10 mM because aggregation was observed at
higher concentrations.7a Intramolecular hydrogen bonding was
evaluated by plotting the change in the chemical shift of the amide
and the pyrrole protons as a function of DMSO-d6 added to the
peptide in CD2Cl2 (Figure 2) because exchangeable protons engaged
in intramolecular hydrogen bonds are typically not influenced by
strong hydrogen-bonding solvents, such as DMSO-d6 relative to
exposed protons.7b,8 The prolyl amide isomer equilibrium was
measured in CD2Cl2, 2:1 CD2Cl2/DMSO, and DMSO by integration
of the signals for the isomeric amide and R-protons for 4a and 5a
and the pyrrole protons for 4b and 5b. Finally, sequential and long
distance NOEs were measured in the NOESY spectrum of each
peptide to assess the presence of a turn conformation.
The influence of DMSO on the amide proton chemical shifts
was similar in peptides 4 and 5 (Figure 2). In 4, the amide protons
for Val and Leu were downfield from that for Gly in CD2Cl2 and
were unaffected by the addition of DMSO relative to that for Gly,
which was downfield shifted (∆δ ) 1.29 ppm), indicative of its
exposure to solvent. In peptide 5, the Leu amide proton was
unaffected by the solvent change, indicative of a solvent-shielded
NH. The Phe and Val amide protons were downfield shifted with
the addition of DMSO, indicative of their exposure to the effects
of the solvent. In peptides 4b and 5b, the pyrrole-NH was
influenced most by the solvent change (∆δ ) 1.95 and 2.1 ppm,
respectively). The most significant difference between the Pro and
PyPro peptides was the magnitude of the chemical shift variation
of the Phe amide proton, which was larger for 5a (∆δ ) 1.1 ppm)
than for 5b (∆δ ) 0.6 ppm), potentially due to a different
orientation of the phenyl ring over the peptide backbone.
The population of the amide cis-isomer, N-terminal to Pro and
PyPro (Table 1), was very similar in peptides 4 and 5 and
undetectable in CD2Cl2. In comparison with 20% cis-isomer in
DMSO-d6 observed in a related â-hairpin octapeptide containing a
central D-Pro-Gly residue,8 peptides 4a and 4b exhibited similar
amounts of cis-isomer (19 and 18%, respectively). Alternatively,
relative to 39% cis-isomer observed in Ac-D-Phe-Pro-NH(Me) in
DMSO,1b peptides 5a and 5b exhibited slightly higher cis-isomer
populations (43 and 47%, respectively). When favored â-turn
conformations are assumed, the lower amount of cis-isomer in 4 is
consistent with the stabilization of the trans-isomer by an intramo-
lecular hydrogen bond.9 The significantly higher cis-isomer in 5b
may be due to a staggered π-π interaction between the phenyl
and pyrrole ring in this conformer.1a,10 The greatest difference in
9
14334
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2004, 126, 14334-14335
10.1021/ja0471222 CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society