D.-U. Chen et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 2665–2668
2667
The preparation of the proposed compound 5 is
depicted in Scheme 1. The synthesis started with a
base-catalyzed aldol condensation of 20-hydroxyace-
tophenone and 40-phenylbenzaldehyde 1 under reflux
conditions in methanol for 3 h to give the a,b-unsatu-
rated ketone 2 with a 75% yield.15 Ketone 2 was then
cyclized by refluxing with phosphoric acid in ethanol
for 2 days to yield 2-biphenylchroman-4-one 3 with a
70% yield.15 Further reduction of the ketone 3 (or the
mixtures of 2 and 3) with sodium borohydride in meth-
anol under room temperature for 30 min gave the corre-
inhibition result is quite encouraging if we consider that
the 4-hydroxyl group on the coumarin moiety, which is
crucial for potent VKOR inhibition is not available in
compound 6. Since the importance of hydrogen bonding
in the enzyme–inhibitor interaction is well-recognized,
the inhibition activity of 6 may be attributed, partially
at least, to its novel rigid bicyclic skeleton. Therefore,
future preparation of 4-hydroxycoumarin conserved as
well as conformation-restricted diphenacoum analogues
not only can facilitate the development of potent VKOR
inhibitors but also can serve as a lead compound for fur-
ther study of the mode of action of coumarin-type anti-
coagulants at the molecular level.
sponding alcohol
4
quantitatively. The final
condensation of 4 with 4-hydroxycoumarin in 1,2-
dichloroethane in the presence of a catalytic amount
of p-toluenesulfonic acid under reflux conditions for
6 h afforded the target compound 5 with a 78% yield.
This concise synthetic route is highly attractive since
no column chromatography is needed. When compound
5 was further heated with aluminum chloride at 130–
140 °C for 30 min, a cyclized compound 6 formed as ex-
pected. Alternatively, this dioxabicyclic derivative 6 can
be prepared directly from condensation of alcohol 4
with 4-hydroxycoumarin in AlCl3.16 Numerous attempts
to obtain a satisfactory crystal structure of 6 proved fu-
tile, presumably due to the extended biphenyl moiety in
6 preventing proper crystal formation. Nevertheless, the
structure of 6 was indirectly confirmed by X-ray crystal-
lographic analysis of 6a,17 as depicted in Figure 3, which
was prepared by the exact same procedure as 6 except
benzaldehyde 1a was used as the starting material.
In conclusion, we have rationally designed, chemically
synthesized, and characterized two novel diphena-
coum-derived, conformation-restricted analogues. Bio-
logical evaluation demonstrated that 5 is a potent and
6 is a moderate VKOR inhibitor. Further design and
synthesis of a rigid diphenacoum-derived analogue,
which retains the 4-hydroxycoumarin functionality is
currently underway.
Acknowledgements
The financial assistance provided by National Science
Council of Republic of China is gratefully
acknowledged.
The inhibition studies of 5 and 6 with partially purified
VKOR18 from beef liver indicated that compound 5
remains a potent VKOR inhibitor with IC50 value of
0.04 lM, which is 2.5-fold more potent than warfarin.19
This result confirmed that the replacement of the tetra-
hydronaphthalene on diphenacoum with a chroman
functionality does not have a major impact on inhibition
potency. Although further toxicity tests are needed, the
four-step, highly efficient synthesis of 5 from relatively
inexpensive starting materials and reagents makes it
suitable for mass production on an industrial scale.
The conformation-restricted compound 6, on the other
hand, was a moderate VKOR inhibitor with IC50 value
of 1 lM, which is 10-fold less potent than warfarin. This
References and notes
1. Bell, R. G.; Matchiner, J. T. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1970,
141, 473–476.
2. Suttie, J. W. Vitamin K; In Handbook of Lipid Research;
Deluca, H. F., Ed.; Plenum: New York, 1978; pp 211–277.
3. Cain, D.; Hutson, S. M.; Wallin, R. Thromb. Haemostasis
1998, 80, 128–133.
4. Suttie, J. W. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1985, 54, 459–477.
5. Furie, B.; Furie, C. Cell 1988, 53, 505–518.
6. Wallin, R.; Sane, D. C.; Hutson, S. M. Thromb. Res. 2003,
108, 221–226.
7. Suttie, J. W. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and
Biology; Wessler, S., Becker, C. G., Nemerson, Y., Eds.;
Plenum: New York, 1987; Vol. 214, pp 3–16.
8. Fasco, M. J.; Principe, L. M.; Walsh, W. A.; Friedman,
P. A. Biochemistry 1983, 22, 5655–5660.
9. Wallin, R.; Patrick, S. D.; Martin, L. F. Int. J. Biochem.
1987, 19, 1063–1068.
10. Raj, G.; Kumar, R.; McKinney, W. P. Am. J. Med. Sci.
1994, 307, 128–132.
11. Hadler, M. R.; Shadbolt, R. S. Nature 1975, 253, 275–277.
12. Routh, C. R.; Triplett, D. A.; Murphy, M. J.; Felice, L. J.;
Sadowski, J. A.; Bovill, E. G. Am. J. Hematol. 1991, 36,
50–54.
13. van Heerden, P. S.; Bezuidenhuodt, B. C. B.; Ferreira, D.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 1141–1146.
14. Thijssen, H. H. W. Pestic. Sci. 1995, 43, 73–78.
15. Hsu, K. K.; Shi, J. Y. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 1973, 20, 51–56.
16. For preparation of 5 and 6 from 4: To a solution of 2-
biphenyl-4-yl-chroman-4-ol 4 (0.2 g, 0.66 mmol) and 4-
hydroxycoumarin (0.1 g, 0.62 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane
(25 mL) was added a catalytic amount of p-toluenesulfonic
acid. This mixture was then gently refluxed for 6 h. After
completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the
Figure 3. X-ray crystal structure of compound 6a.