Angewandte
Chemie
offset by dynamic disordering of the flexible ethylene glycol
chains. The mobility of the carbon and oxygen atoms in the
side chains significantly increases in the absence of guest
molecules, as shown by the ORTEP drawing of the square-
grid cavity in Figure 3.
Experimental Section
Single crystals of 2 were grown by layering a methanol solution of
Co(NO3)2·6H2O (5.8 mg in 1 mL) onto a toluene solution of 1
(15.0 mg in 2 mL). After allowing the solution to stand for 4 d, the
crystals were isolated in 76% yield by filtration. Elemental analysis
(%) calculated: C 50.53, H 4.98, N 8.84; found: C 50.34, H 4.86, N
8.72. Crystal data for 2: orthorhombic, Pbcn, a = 20.580(6), b =
23.717(7), c = 8.820(3) ꢀ, V= 4263.9(7) ꢀ3, Z = 4, T= 80 K, 1calcd
=
1.434 gcmÀ3, m = 0.483 mmÀ1, final R1 (I > 2s(I)) = 0.0762, wR2 (all
data) = 0.2062, GOF = 1.044.
Crystal data for 3: orthorhombic, Pbcn, a = 20.572(5), b =
23.092(5), c = 8.496(2) ꢀ, V= 4036.0(16) ꢀ3, Z = 4, T= 423 K,
1calcd = 1.441 gcmÀ3 m = 0.506 mmÀ1
, , final R1 (I > 2s(I)) = 0.1039,
wR2 (all data) = 0.2384, GOF = 1.039.
2’: Elemental analysis (%) calculated: C 50.53, H 4.98, N 8.84;
found: C 50.60, H 4.89, N 8.73. Crystal data for 2’: orthorhombic,
Pbcn, a = 20.576(2), b = 23.677(3), c = 8.7155(9) ꢀ, V= 4246.0(8) ꢀ3,
Z = 4, T= 80 K, 1calcd = 1.304 gcmÀ3, m = 0.466 mmÀ1, final R1 (I >
2s(I)) = 0.0948, wR2 (all data) = 0.2206, GOF = 1.025.
All the diffraction data were measured on a Siemens SMART/
CCD diffractometer (MoKa radiation, l = 0.71073 ꢀ). Non-hydrogen
atoms were refined anisotropically and hydrogen atoms were fixed at
calculated positions and refined using a riding model. CCDC-250540
(2), -250541 (3), and -250542 (2’) contain the supplementary crystallo-
graphic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge
from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center via
Received: October 6, 2004
Published online: February 25, 2005
Keywords: cobalt · coordination polymers · host–guest systems ·
.
hydrogen bonds · ligand design
[1] For pertinent reviews, see: a) S. Kitagawa, R. Kitaura, S. Noro,
Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 2388 – 2430; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 2334 – 2375; b) C. Janiak, Dalton Trans. 2003, 2781 –
2804.
[2] Single-crystal-to-single-crystal guest inclusion/removal in coordi-
nation networks is a topic of current interest: a) H. Li, M.
Eddaoudi, M. OꢁKeeffe, O. M. Yaghi, Nature 1999, 402, 276 – 279;
b) S. S.-Y. Chui, S. M.-F. Lo, J. P. H. Charmant, A. G. Orpen, I. D.
Williams, Science 1999, 283, 1148 – 1150; c) C. J. Kepert, M. J.
Rosseinsky, Chem. Commun. 1999, 375 – 376; d) K. Biradha, Y.
Hongo, M. Fujita, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 4001 – 4003; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3843 – 3845.
[3] For the dynamic behavior of coordination networks in a single-
crystal-to-single-crystal fashion, see: a) K. Biradha, M. Fujita,
Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 3542 – 3545; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 3392 – 3395; b) K. Biradha, Y. Hongo, M. Fujita, Angew.
Chem. 2002, 114, 3545 – 3548; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
3395 – 3398; c) M. P. Suh, W. J. Ko, H. J. Choi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 10976 – 10977; d) S. Takamizawa, E. Nakata, T. Saito,
Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 1392 – 1395; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 1368 – 1371; e) B. F. Abrahams, M. Moylan, S. D.
Orchard, R. Robson, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 1892 – 1895;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1848 – 1851; f) T. K. Maji, K.
Uemura, H.-C. Chang, R. Matsuda, S. Kitagawa, Angew. Chem.
2004, 116, 3331 – 3334; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3269 –
3272; g) D. N. Dybtsev, H. Chun, K. Kim, Angew. Chem. 2004,
116, 5143 – 5146; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5033 – 5036.
[4] For reversible single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformation of
coordination networks, see: a) B. Rather, M. J. Zaworotko, Chem.
Commun. 2003, 830 – 831; b) E. Y. Lee, M. P. Suh, Angew. Chem.
2004, 116, 2858 – 2861; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2798 –
Figure 3. ORTEP drawing (30% probability) of a square-grid unit of 2
(a) and 3 (b). The bridging ligand of 3 shows considerable distortion
compared to that of 2. The disordered guest water molecules in (a)
have been omitted for clarity.
Thermogravimetric analysis of the crystal of 2 showed loss
of all water molecules in the range 25–908C. The number of
water molecules removed (weight loss of 6.47%) agrees well
with that determined by X-ray analysis (6.6%). DSC analysis
of a crystal of 2 showed two endothermic peaks at 93.88C and
77.48C, which are attributed to the release of coordinated
water from the cobalt ion and noncoordinated water from the
cavity, respectively.
In summary, we have succeeded in the crystallographic
observation of an apical-ligand-exchange reaction at a cobalt
ion within a square-grid coordination network. Since ligand
exchange at a metal is a bimolecular reaction, the process can
only rarely be observed by X-ray crystallography. We have
realized the in situ crystallographic observation of this
dynamic process, which involves drastic structural changes
around the reaction center, by utilizing functionalized bridg-
ing ligands. The in situ observation of various chemical
processes in the fluid cavity is our next challenge, and the
results will be reported in due course.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2151 –2154
ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2153