Aureliano Antunes et al.
SCHEME 7
(Chart 2, TS-I). This picture is clearly more in line with
the experimental evidences presented above.38
This hypothesis is in contrast with the suggestion of
Banks and Scaiano that the 1-oxaspiro[2,5]octadienyl
radical is a true intermediate in the neophyl-like rear-
rangement of the 1,1-diphenylethoxyl radical.5 In this
context, it is important to point out that this suggestion
was not supported by any direct experimental evidence
but only by the results of AM1-UHF calculations, which,
however, are not expected to provide sufficiently reliable
results. Unfortunately, theoretical calculations carried
out at a higher lever of theory, which may provide
additional information on the mechanism of the O-
neophyl rearrangement of 1,1-diarylalkoxyl radicals, are
not presently available.
CHART 2
In conclusion, the results of product and time-resolved
kinetic studies on the O-neophyl rearrangement of ring-
substituted 1,1-diarylalkoxyl radicals strongly support
the hypothesis that the reaction proceeds through a
concerted mechanism and not via formation of an inter-
mediate 1-oxaspiro[2,5]octadienyl radical as previously
proposed.3,5,6 The rearrangement is governed by electronic
effects in the starting 1,1-diarylalkoxyl radicals, ex-
plained in terms of negative hyperconjugative contribu-
tions, whereas the stability of the rearranged carbon-
centered radical plays a minor role.
that fully accounts for the results of kinetic and product
studies. In addition, the reactivity order observed in the
series of the symmetric cyclopropyldiarylmethoxyl radi-
cals 4•, 6•, and 8• (8• > 4• > 6•) reflects their differences
in stability, which, accordingly, are expected to follow the
opposite order (6• > 4• > 8•), with the ring-dimethoxylated
radical 6• characterized by the greatest extent of reso-
nance stabilization.
Experimental Section
Materials. Spectroscopic-grade MeCN was used as received.
CH2Cl2 was purified prior to use by column chromatography
over basic alumina. (Diacetoxy)iodobenzene (DIB), iodine, 1,1-
diphenylethanol (1a), cyclopropyldiphenylmethanol (4a), and
cyclopropyl-4-methoxydiphenylmethanol (5a) were of the high-
est commercial quality available and were used as received.
Details of the synthesis of 1,1-diarylalkanols 2a, 3a, 6a-8a,
the tert-butyl 1,1-diarylethyl peroxides (1p-3p), and tert-butyl
cyclopropyldiarylmethyl peroxides (4p-8p) are given in the
Supporting Information. The purity of the 1,1-diarylalkanols
(1a-8a) employed in the product studies was always g99%.
Product Analysis. All the reactions were carried out under
an argon atmosphere. Irradiations were performed with visible
light (10 × 15 W lamps with emission between 400 and 550
nm, λmax ≈ 480 nm). The reactor was a cylindrical flask
equipped with a water cooling jacket thermostated at T ) 20
°C. Irradiation times were chosen in such a way as to avoid
complete substrate consumption. In a typical experiment, a
solution of the alcohol (10 mM) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) containing
(diacetoxy)iodobenzene (22 mM) and iodine (10 mM) was
irradiated for times ranging between 5 and 60 min under Ar
bubbling. The reaction mixture was then poured into water
and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 10 mL). The combined organic
layers were washed with a 10% aqueous thiosulfate solution
(2 × 30 mL) and water (2 × 30 mL) and dried over anhydrous
sodium sulfate. Reaction products and unreacted substrate
were identified by GC-MS and quantitatively determined by
GC using bibenzyl as internal standard. Good-to-excellent
mass balances (g85%) were obtained in all experiments.
Laser Flash Photolysis Studies. Laser flash photolysis
experiments were carried out with a laser kinetic spectrometer
using the fourth harmonic (266 nm) of a Q-switched Nd:YAG
laser. The laser energy was adjusted to e10 mJ/pulse by the
use of the appropriate filter. A 3-mL Suprasil quartz cell (10
mm × 10 mm) was used for all experiments. Argon- or oxygen-
saturated MeCN solutions of the peroxides 1p-8p (between
It is thus possible to discuss the results of product and
time-resolved kinetic studies described above in terms
of the two possible mechanisms proposed previously for
the O-neophyl rearrangement of the 1,1-diphenylethoxyl
radical (Scheme 7, R ) Me, cyclopropyl, showing for the
sake of simplicity a ring-unsubstituted radical):2 the
stepwise mechanism, proceeding through the formation
of a bridged 1-oxaspiro[2,5]octadienyl radical intermedi-
ate (paths b and c), and the concerted mechanism (path
a).
In a stepwise mechanism, by reasonably assuming that
the first step is the rate-determining one5 and by
considering that the rearranged benzyl radical (III) is
significantly more stable than the parent 1,1-diaryla-
lkoxyl radical (I), the bridged 1-oxaspiro[2,5]octadienyl
radical intermediate (II) is expected to be at a relatively
higher energy than I.5,36 Thus, as a consequence of the
Hammond postulate,37 the transition state of the rate-
determining step will be close in structure to radical II,
exhibiting a pronounced cyclohexadienyl radical charac-
ter (Chart 2, TS-II). On the other hand, in a concerted
mechanism a reactant-like transition state that is close
in structure to radical I, displaying a certain extent of
charge separation and a limited cyclohexadienyl radical
character, is to be expected, a transition state where
formation of a new bond by attack of the oxygen radical
onto the aromatic ring has not proceeded significantly
(35) According to this picture, the observation that the rate constants
for â-scission of ring-substituted cumyloxyl radicals are essentially
independent from the nature of the substituent (see ref 22) may
indicate that substituent effects operate in the same direction on both
the cumyloxyl radical and the product acetophenone.
(36) Asensio, A.; Dannenberg, J. J. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 5996-
5999.
(38) As a consequence of a reactant-like transition state, possible
differences in C-CAr BDE in the 1,1-diaryalkoxyl radicals determined
by the presence of ring substituents should not be important.
(37) Hammond, G. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 334-338.
3890 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 10, 2005