C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 3
Figure 1. AM1 conformation of 6 and cycloaddition transition states.
(Figure 1). This seemingly contrasteric result can be understood
by considering the preferred conformation of the cyclic oxocarbe-
nium ion. The lowest energy conformation of this intermediate was
determined via a Monte Carlo conformational search using the AM1
method.8 The four sp2 centers within the seven-membered ring are
nearly coplanar, while the remaining three sp3 atoms adopt a more
staggered conformation. The alkyl substituent on the ring splays
outward from the periphery of the molecule and does not interfere
with the incoming diene. However, the three sp3 hybridized atoms
contain three pseudoaxial hydrogens (Ha, Hb, and Hc in Figure 1)
that could potentially interfere with the approach of the diene. Of
these, Ha and Hb point toward the top face of the structure as
depicted, and Hc points toward the bottom. We hypothesize that
Ha and Hb more effectively block the top face of the molecule
and thereby dictate that the diene approach from the bottom face.9
To probe for the intermediacy of an oxocarbenium ion, we
studied the corresponding bis-TIPS ether (12), which cannot form
an oxocarbenium ion under our optimized reaction conditions
(Al(OTf)3/TfOH, CH2Cl2, -20 °C, eq 2). Under these conditions,
this compound provides an 85:15 mixture of the trans-alkene 14
with both TIPS ethers intact and the Diels-Alder adducts 13 as a
mixture of diastereomers. At 0 °C, a 10:90 mixture of 14 and 13,
again as a mixture of diastereomers, is observed. The decreased
reactivity and selectivity of 12 as compared to that of 5 suggests
that these compounds react via different mechanisms and that 5
reacts via the corresponding oxocarbenium ion.
Acknowledgment. We thank the NIH (GM48498) for financial
support of this work, Dr. Bruce Noll for obtaining the X-ray crystal
structure of compound 11, and Professor Andrew Phillips for
assistance with the AM1 calculations. NMR instrumentation used
in this work was supported in part by the National Science
Foundation CRIF program (CHE-0131003).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures for
the synthesis and characterization of all new compounds as well as 1H
and 13C spectra for selected compounds, and X-ray crystallography data
for compound 11. This material is available free of charge via the
References
(1) For an early review, see: Rosen, T.; Heathcock, C. H. Tetrahedron 1986,
42, 4909-4951.
(2) Lam, Y. K. T.; Gullo, V. P.; Goegelman, R. T.; Jorn, D.; Huang, L.;
DeRiso, C.; Monaghan, R. L.; Putter, I. J. Antibiot. 1981, 34, 614.
(3) (a) Yang, Y.-L.; Manna, S.; Falck, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106,
3811. (b) Funk, R. L.; Zeller, W. E. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 180. (c)
Zeller, W. E. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, 1985.
(d) Marino, J. P.; Long, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7916. (e)
Hagiwara, H.; Kon-no, M.; Uda, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992,
866. (f) Hagiwara, H.; Kon-no, M.; Nakano, T.; Uda, H. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. I 1994, 2417. (g) Burke, S. D.; Deaton, D. N. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1991, 32, 4651. (h) Nagashima, S.; Taishi, T.; Kanematsu, K.
Heterocycles 1994, 39, 55.
(4) Danishefsky and Uskokov´ıc have described syntheses of compactin and
mevinolin, respectively, which proceed with remote stereocontrol in which
the key step is a diastereoselective hetero-Diels-Alder reaction used to
construct the lactone. See: (a) Danishefsky, S. J.; Simoneau, B. Pure
Appl. Chem. 1988, 60, 1555. (b) Danishefsky, S. J.; Simoneau, B. J. Am
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2599. (c) Wovkulich, P. M.; Tang, P. C.; Chadha,
N. K.; Batcho, A. D.; Barrish, J. C.; Uskokov´ıc, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 2596.
(5) (a) Sammakia, T.; Berliner, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 6652. (b)
Sammakia, T.; Berliner, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 6890.
(6) For a review of cycloaddition reactions of vinyl oxocarbenium ions, see:
Harmata, M.; Rashatasakhon, P. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 2371.
(7) Tsunoda, T.; Suzuki, M.; Noyori, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 1357.
(8) For details of the molecular modeling, including the structures of other
low-energy conformers, see the Supporting Information.
(9) For examples of related contrasteric reactions, see: (a) Haynes, R. K.;
Lam, K.-P.; Wu, K.-Y.; Williams, I. D.; Yeung, L.-L. Tetrahedron 1999,
55, 89. (b) Liu, H.-J.; Yeh, W.-L.; Browne, E. N. C. Can. J. Chem. 1995,
73, 1135.
Completion of the synthesis was accomplished as described in
Scheme 3. The primary alcohol of compound 11 was selectively
protected as the trityl ether (73%) and the ketone at C-1 reduced
with L-selectride to the hindered axial alcohol (93%).1 The less
hindered hydroxyl group at C-5′ was then acylated with bromoacetyl
bromide (87%) to provide compound 15, and the hindered alcohol
at C-1 was acylated with (S)-2-methylbutyric anhydride using
Vedejs’ conditions (96%).10 Deprotection of the trityl ether with
excess zinc bromide11 provided the primary alcohol at C-3 (80%),
which was oxidized with the Dess-Martin periodinane12 to
aldehyde 16 (79%). Compound 16 then underwent a SmI2 promoted
intramolecular Reformatsky reaction as described by Molander13
to provide (+)-dihydrocompactin in 75% yield as a 7:1 mixture of
isomers at C-3′, which was crystallized to homogeneity.14
(10) Vedejs, E.; Daugulis, O. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 5702.
(11) Kohli, V.; Blo¨cker, H.; Ko¨ster, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 2683.
(12) (a) Dess, D. B.; Matrin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155. (b) Meyer,
S. D.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 7549.
(13) Molander, G. A.; Etter, J. B.; Harring, L. S.; Thorel, P.-J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 8036.
(14) This material was fully characterized and displays identical spectral
properties to that described in the literature (see Supporting Information).
JA043506G
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 18, 2005 6505