afforded 2-(â-naphthyl)ethyl chloride 2a-Cl in 73% yield.
The formation of 2a-Cl is explained by assuming the
following sequence. Protonation of the carbonyl group
induces an intramolecular electrophilic attack on the pendant
vinyl group.4 Elimination of the â-proton quenches the
resultant benzylic cation, yielding tertiary alcohol 3. Proto-
nation of the hydroxy group then assists the removal of water,
setting up an equilibrium with the nonclassical cyclobutyl
cation 4.5 A chloride anion attacks the cation in such a way
to accompany concomitant aromatization, furnishing the
naphthalene derivative 2a-Cl.6 Release of the ring strain
together with aromatic stabilization provides the driving force
for this transformation.
cyclohexadiene moiety with disrotatory motion of the sub-
stituents to furnish the eight-membered ring intermediate
7.9,10 The strain of the four-membered ring is released by
this sequence. Protonation at the benzylic position results in
rearomatization to furnish the eight-membered ring ketone
5a.
Encouraged by these distinctly contrasting results, a variety
of Lewis acids were examined, with the selected results listed
in Table 1. The use of ZnBr2 afforded a mixture of products
Table 1. Effect of Reaction Conditions on the Reaction of
2-(o-Styryl)cyclobutanone 1a
On the other hand, when 1a was heated in m-xylene at
140 °C for 18 h in the presence of molecular sieves (4 Å),
the benzene-fused eight-membered ring ketone 5a was
produced in 25% yield (Scheme 2).7,8 It is likely that the
conditions
solvent temp time
% yielda
Lewis acid
(equiv)
entry
2a (X)
5a
Scheme 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ZnBr2 (1.05)
YbCl3 (2.0)
YbCl3 (2.0)
YbCl3 (2.0)
m-xylene 140 °C 6 h
m-xylene 140 °C 3 h
40 (Br)
14 (Cl)
44 (Cl)
90 (Cl)
27
72
48
b
PhCl
dioxane
130 °C 1 h
100 °C 1 h
Yb(OTf)3 (0.2) m-xylene 140 °C 3 h
<5 (OH) 73
87
24 (OH) 38
Yb(OTf)3 (0.2) PhCl
Yb(OTf)3 (0.2) dioxane
130 °C 0.5 h
100 °C 3 h
b
a Determined by 1H NMR of the crude reaction mixture. b Not detected.
2a-Br (40%) and 5a (27%) (entry 1). The reactions with
AlCl3 (-10 °C) and Cu(OTf)2 (140 °C) resulted in lower
conversion. With SnCl4 (-78 °C) and BF3‚OEt2 (-78 °C),
a complex mixture of products was obtained. Gratifying
activities were finally found with ytterbium(III) salts. In the
case of YbCl3, the product distribution was largely influenced
by the solvent employed (entries 2-4).11 Whereas a mixture
of 2a-Cl and 5a was obtained in m-xylene and in chloroben-
zene, 2a-Cl was produced exclusively in 90% yield using
1,4-dioxane. On the other hand, the use of Yb(OTf)3 as the
catalyst (20 mol %) favored the formation of the eight-
membered ring ketone 5a. In particular, 5a was obtained as
the sole product when the reaction was carried out in
chlorobenzene at 130 °C (entry 6).
Thus, appropriate selection of Lewis acid and solvent
dramatically alters the reaction pathway. A polar solvent
favors the formation of a nonclassical cation, and opening
of the four-membered ring predominates in the presence of
a nucleophilic halide anion. On the other hand, the use of a
less polar solvent disfavors the ionic pathway, and the
absence of a suitable nucleophile steers the reaction course
to an alternative electrocyclic pathway to open the six-
membered ring.
Lewis acidic character of the molecular sieves was respon-
sible for activating the carbonyl group and promoting
electrophilic cyclization, since no thermal reaction occurred
in their absence. Loss of a proton then generates tricyclic
intermediate 6, as is the case with the HCl-promoted reaction.
Intermediate 6, in the absence of an appropriate nucleophile,
undergoes thermal electrocyclic ring-opening of the 1,3-
(4) For a related electrophilic aromatic substitution, see: Bernard, A.
M.; Floris, C.; Frongia, A.; Piras, P. P. Synlett 2002, 796.
(5) (a) Koch, W.; Liu, B.; DeFrees, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110,
7325. (b) Saunders, M.; Laidig, K. E.; Wiberg, K. B.; Schleyer, P. v. R. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7652. (c) Holman, R. W.; Plocica, J.; Blair, L.;
Giblin, D.; Gross, M. L. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2001, 14, 17.
(6) For recent examples of acid-promoted dehydrative aromatization
reactions, see: (a) Kumar, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 3157.
(b) Kabalka, G. W.; Ju, Y.; Wu, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7915. For a
review, see: (c) Bradsher, C. K. Chem. ReV. 1987, 87, 1277.
(7) For the syntheses of eight-membered ring ketones from cyclobu-
tanones, see: (a) Wender, P. A.; Correa, A. G.; Sato, Y.; Sun, R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7815. (b) Oh, H.-S.; Lee, H.-I.; Cha, J. K. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 3707. (c) Dowd, P.; Zhang, W. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 2091.
(d) Mehta, G.; Singh, V. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 881. See also: (e) Paquette,
L. A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 1709. (f) Hamura, T.; Kawano, N.; Tsuji,
S.; Matsumoto, T.; Suzuki, K. Chem. Lett. 2002, 1042.
(9) For the disrotatory 6π electrocyclic ring-opening of bicyclo[4.2.0]-
octane ring system, see: (a) Wang, T.-Z.; Paquette, L. A. J. Org. Chem.
1986, 51, 5232. (b) Takeda, T.; Fujiwara, T. Synlett 1996, 481.
(10) For a related ring-expansion, see: Suginome, H.; Itoh, M.; Koba-
yashi, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1988, 491.
(11) Use of other lanthanide salts such as SmCl3 and CeCl3 led to poor
reactivities compared with YbCl3.
(8) 9,10-Dihydrobenzocycloocten-7(8H)-one skeleton is similar to that
obtained by the rhodium-catalyzed reaction of 2-(o-styryl)cyclobutanone
(ref 2). Under rhodium catalysis, however, no reaction occurred with 1a
having an additional methyl group at the R-position, presumably because
the rhodium insertion was hampered due to the increased steric congestion.
2060
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 10, 2005