calculated from the harmonic oscillator approximation of the O–O
oxygenation reaction with its iron(II)–copper( ) complex has been
I
16
stretching vibration [D
( O2/18O2) = 46 cm21]. These ob-
preliminarily investigated by various spectroscopic methods.
This work was financially supported by the Grant-in-Aid for
COE Research (#08CE2005) and for Scientific Research on
Priority Areas (#09235225 and 11228207) from MEXT and for
Scientific Research (A) (#14204073) from JSPS. P&P project,
Green Chemistry, of Kyushu University partly supported this
research. J.-G. Liu gratefully acknowledges JSPS for providing
postdoctoral fellowship.
calcd
served n(O–O) values are similar to those of previous reported
dioxygen adducts in the peroxy state.4,8 (4) Both 11 and 12 are EPR
silent in a frozen solution (CH3CN, 77K), which indicates the
presence of the strong antiferromagnetic coupling between the two
metals.
The formed peroxo species are stable at 2 30 °C in CH3CN, and
on warming of the solution to room temperature (after removal of
excess O2 in vacuo), the dioxygen adducts [LOMOMFeIII–O2–CuII]+
(11) and [LOHFeIII–O2–CuII]+ (12) exhibit interesting differences.
For 11, the major decomposed product is the m-oxo complex
formulated as [LOMOMFeIII–O–CuII]+ [m/z, 1346.6 (M+)] with UV–
vis features [lmax = 440 nm (Soret)] similar to the reported m-oxo
analogues.8,9 By contrast, no m-oxo final species is observed for 12.
The final decomposed product demonstrates features like that of the
hydroxo ferric porphyrin derivatives.10 The EPR spectrum (MeCN,
77 K) of the product shows signals at g = 5.56 and 1.99
corresponding to a high spin iron(III) porphyrin, and signals at g∑ =
2.23 and g4 = 2.06, which are assigned to a S = 1/2 Cu(II) ion in
a tetragonal field.11 We tentatively formulate the product as
[LOHFeIII–OH, CuII]2+. The decomposition mechanism and further
product characterization are in progress.
Notes and references
‡ Synthetic details will be reported elsewhere. All new compounds were
fully characterized by spectroscopic methods. Stated yields refer to isolated
compounds and the purity was guaranteed by chromatography. Data for
LOH (8), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.84 (d, J = 8.0, 1 H), 8.75 (d, J =
4.8, 2 H), 8.67 (d, J = 4.4, 2 H), 8.63 (d, J = 3.6, 4 H), 8.03 (d, J = 6.0,
1 H), 7.85 (d, J = 7.2, 1 H), 7.83 (s, 1 H), 7.76 (s, 1 H), 7.54 (t, 1 H), 7.24
~ 7.26 (m, 6 H), 7.20 (s, 2 H), 7.14 (s, 1 H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.0, 1 H), 6.77
(d, J = 6.0, 1 H), 6.70 (d, J = 8.0, 1 H), 6.59 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H,), 6.28
(s, 1 H), 6.03 (s, 1 H), 3.29 (s, 2 H), 3.25 (s, 2 H), 3.16 (s, 2 H), 2.86 (s, 3
H), 2.60 (s, 3 H), 2.58 (s, 6 H), 2.13 (s, 3 H), 1.85 (s, 3 H), 1.82 (s, 6 H), 1.79
(s, 3 H), 1.75 (s, 6 H), 2 2.54 (s, 2 H). IR (KBr) 3411, 3318, 3026, 2916,
2855, 1697, 1683, 1674, 1652, 1599, 1578, 1558, 1520, 1472, 1457, 1446,
1399, 1377, 1344, 1284, 1257, 1217, 1188, 1131, 1070, 968, 804 cm21. HR-
MS (FAB, NBA) Found: 1170.5869. Calcd for C76H72N11O2: [M + H]+,
1170.5870.
In summary, a novel heme-based binucleating ligand incorpo-
rated with N-(2A-hydroxyphenyl)imidazole moiety as a CcO’s CuB
site mimic has been designed and successfully prepared. The
1 S. Ferguson-Miller and G. T. Babcock, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 2889; G.
T. Babcock, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1999, 96, 12971.
2 S. Yoshikawa, K. Shinzawa-Itoh, R. Nakashima, R. Yaono, E.
Yamashita, N. Inoue, M. Yao, M. J. Fei, C. P. Libeu, T. Mizushima, H.
Yamaguchi, T. Tomizaki and T. Tsukihara, Science, 1998, 280, 1723; C.
Ostermeier, A. Harrenga, U. Ermler and H. Michel, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 1997, 94, 10547.
3 D. A. Proshlyakov, M. A. Pressler, C. DeMaso, J. F. Leykam, D. L.
DeWitt and G. T. Babcock, Science, 2000, 290, 1588; E. Pinakoulaki, U.
Pfitzner, B. Ludwig and C. Varotsis, J. Biol. Chem., 2002, 277,
13563.
4 J. P. Collman, R. Boulatov and C. J. Sunderland, in The Porphyrin
Handbook, eds. K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith and R. Guilard, Academic
Press, San Diego, 2003, Vol. 11, pp. 1–49 and references cited
therein.
5 J. P. Collman, Z. Wang, M. Zhong and L. Zeng, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1, 2000, 1217; K. M. McCauley, J. M. Vrtis, J. Dupont and W.
A. van der Donk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 2403; J. A. Cappuccio,
I. Ayala, G. I. Elliott, I. Szundi, J. Lewis, J. P. Konopelski, B. A. Barry
and O. Einarsdottir, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 1750; M. Aki, T.
Ogura, Y. Naruta, T. H. Le, T. Sato and T. Kitagawa, J. Phys. Chem. A,
2002, 106, 3436.
Fig. 1 UV–visible spectral changes of 10, [LOHFeIICuI]+, to 12 upon
exposure to dioxygen in CH3CN at 230 °C.
6 K. Kamaraj, E. Kim, B. Galliker, L. N. Zakharov, A. L. Rheingold, A.
D. Zuberbuhler and K. D. Karlin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125,
6028.
7 J. P. Collman and M. Zhong, Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 1233. The coupling
reaction affords two isomers, N-1 and N-3 aryl products, which can be
readily separated by silica-gel column chromatography in 75% (N-1)
and 7% (N-3) yields, respectively.
8 T. Chishiro, Y. Shimazaki, F. Tani, Y. Tachi, Y. Naruta, S. Karasawa,
S. Hayami and Y. Maeda, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 2788; Y.
Naruta, T. Sasaki, F. Tani, Y. Tachi, N. Kawato and N. Nakamura, J.
Inorg. Biochem., 2001, 83, 239.
9 E. Kim, M. E. Helton, I. M. Wasser, K. D. Karlin, S. Lu, H.-W. Huang,
P. Moenne-Loccoz, C. D. Incarvito, A. L. Rheingold, M. Honecker, S.
Kaderli and A. D. Zuberbuhler, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2003, 100,
3623; M.-A. Kopf and K. D. Karlin, Inorg. Chem., 1999, 38, 4922.
10 Data for the decomposed product [LOHFeIII–OH, CuII]2+: UV–vis
(CH3CN) lmax = 418, 560 nm. ESI–MS m/z = 651.9 (M2+).
11 F. Tani, Y. Matsumoto, Y. Tachi, T. Sasaki and Y. Naruta, Chem.
Commun., 1998, 1731; B. Andrioletti, D. Richard and B. Boitrel, New J.
Chem., 1999, 23, 1143. As comparison, the EPR spectrum of the
dinuclear complex [LOHFeIII–CuII]OTf3 shows signals at g = 5.45 and
2.01, g∑ = 2.24 and g4 = 2.09, respectively.
Fig. 2 Resonance Raman spectra of 12 formed from 16O2 (A) and 18O2 (B).
The difference spectra A minus B is shown as trace C (3% toluene in
CH3CN, 230 °C, 413 nm excitation).
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 2 0 – 1 2 1
121