I. Hiromitsu et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 474 (2009) 315–319
319
Table 1
Energy transfer efficiency
U of the ZnO–porphyrin systems in diethylene glycol.
System
Diluted by three times
Diluted by 21 times
!
!
Zn : 1:7 ꢁ 10ꢂ3 mol=L
Zn : 2:4 ꢁ 10ꢂ4 mol=L
Porphyrin : 1:4 ꢁ 10ꢂ5 mol=L
Porphyrin : 1:0 ꢁ 10ꢂ4 mol=L
(ZnO–LC)–H2TPPa
69 6%
59 5%
60 5%
33 15%
29 17%
37 12%
(ZnO–LC)–H2TPP(NH2)a
ZnO–H2TPP(NH2)b
a
ZnO–LC denotes the ZnO nanoparticles treated with L-cysteine.
Without L-cystine.
b
amino groups. The above two features clearly indicate that the en-
ergy transfer in the (ZnO–LC)–H2TPP and (ZnO–LC)–H2TPP(NH2)
systems is due to the collisions between the ZnO particle and TPP.
Table 1 also shows the results for the ZnO–H2TPP(NH2) system
were generated at 540 and 577 nm, the origin of which is unknown
at present. The energy transfer efficiency from the photoexcited
ZnO to the porphyrin was the same for (ZnO–LC)–H2TPP, (ZnO–
LC)–H2TPP(NH2) and ZnO–H2TPP(NH2), and the efficiency became
smaller by diluting the system by adding diethylene glycol. This
clearly indicates that the energy transfer occurs by the collisions
of the ZnO particles with porphyrins in the dispersion. ZnO and
without L-cysteine. It is observed that L-cysteine does not affect
the energy transfer efficiency, which is as expected because
teine does not work as a linker between ZnO and TPP.
L-cys-
The present energy transfer from ZnO to porphyrin may be ex-
plained by the Förster’s mechanism [13]. In the Förster’s theory,
the energy transfer rate kET obeys the following relationship.
TPP do not bound with each other because
to the ZnO particles.
L-cysteine is not bound
Z
Acknowledgment
1
kET
¼
IDðkÞeAðkÞk4 dk=R6;
ð2Þ
0
The authors thank Prof. Sugimori in Toyama University for his
help in the characterization of the porphyrins by measuring their
MALDI-TOF mass spectra. The TEM observation of the ZnO particles
were performed at Center for Integrated Research in Science,
Shimane University.
where ID(k) is the emission spectrum of the energy donor,
e
A(k) is
the absorption coefficient of the energy acceptor, R is the distance
between the donor and the acceptor. In the present system, the
emission spectrum of ZnO shown in Fig. 3 overlaps with the strong
B-band absorption of the TPP’s shown in Fig. 4, while the emission
spectra of the TPP’s shown in Fig. 5 do not have any overlap with the
absorption spectrum of ZnO shown in Fig. 3. Thus, the direction of
the energy transfer is expected to be from ZnO to TPP, as observed
in the present experiment. In the present system, the ZnO particles
and TPP can move in the dispersion, so that the energy transfer can
occur when they are in close proximity to each other. The effective
distance at which the transfer occurs is unknown.
References
[1] A.R. Clapp, I.L. Medintz, J.M. Mauro, B.R. Fisher, M.G. Bawendi, H. Mattoussi, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 301.
[2] A. Dorfman, N. Kumar, J. Hahm, Langmuir 22 (2006) 4890.
[3] A. Dorfman, N. Kumar, J. Hahm, Adv. Mater. 18 (2006) 2685.
[4] X. Cao, C.M. Li, H. Bao, Q. Bao, H. Dong, Chem. Mater. 19 (2007) 3773.
[5] A. Dif, E. Henry, F. Artzner, M. Baudi-Floc’h, M. Schmutz, M. Dahan, V. Marchi-
Artzner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 8289.
Generally, there can be another mechanism of the luminescence
quenching, which is the photoinduced electron transfer from elec-
tron donor to acceptor. In the present system, the LUMO level of
TPP’s is ꢃ3.3 eV calculated from the reported ionization potential
of 5.2 eV [26] and the optical HOMO–LUMO gap of ꢃ1.9 eV. On
the other hand, the conduction band edge of ZnO locates at
4.4 eV [27]. Thus, the electron transfer is possible from the LUMO
level of TPP’s to the conduction band of ZnO, resulting in the lumi-
nescence quenching of TPP’s. However, no substantial quenching of
the TPP emission was observed in the present systems. This may be
another evidence that the present TPP’s are not bound to the ZnO
particles.
[6] J. Chen, F. Zeng, S. Wu, Q. Chen, Z. Tong, Chem. Eur. J. 14 (2008) 4851.
[7] D.C. Hone et al., Langmuir 18 (2002) 2985.
[8] A.C.S. Samia, X. Chen, C. Burda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 15736.
[9] I. Roy et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 7860.
[10] Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, S. Wang, C. Pope, W. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 (2008)
143901.
[11] S. Dayal, Y. Lou, A.C.S. Samia, J.C. Berlin, M.E. Kenney, C. Burda, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 128 (2006) 13974.
[12] M. Idowu, J.-Y. Chen, T. Nyokong, New J. Chem. 32 (2008) 290.
[13] A.A.R. Neves, A. Camposeo, R. Cingolani, D. Pisignano, Adv. Funct. Mater. 18
(2008) 751.
[14] S. Moeno, T. Nyokong, Polyhedron 27 (2008) 1953.
[15] A.M.-C. Ng et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 18 (2008) 566.
[16] H.-M. Cheng, H.-C. Hsu, S.-L. Chen, W.-T. Wu, C.-C. Kao, L.-J. Lin, W.-F. Hsieh, J.
Cryst. Growth 277 (2005) 192.
[17] K.-F. Lin, H.-M. Cheng, H.-C. Hsu, L.-J. Lin, W.-F. Hsieh, Chem. Phys. Lett. 409
(2005) 208.
[18] W.J. Kruper, T.A. Chamberlin, M. Kochanny, J. Org. Chem. 54 (1989) 2753.
[19] R. Luguya, L. Jaquinod, F.R. Fronczek, M.G.H. Vicente, K.M. Smith, Tetrahedron
60 (2004) 2757.
[20] J.V. Staros, Biochemistry 21 (1982) 3950.
[21] S. Wang, N. Mamedova, N.A. Kotov, W. Chen, J. Studer, Nano Lett. 2 (2002) 817.
[22] M. Gouterman, Porphyrins 3 (1978) 1.
4. Conclusions
Photoluminescence properties of the (ZnO–LC)–porphyrin sys-
tems dispersed in diethylene glycol were studied using four kinds
of tetraphenylporphyrins, H2TPP, H2TPP(NH2), H2TPP(NH2)2 and
ZnTPP(NH2)2. The central hydrogen atoms of the metal-free TPP’s
were replaced by Zn atom by an aging of 2–4 weeks, which altered
the Q-band features of the TPP’s significantly. For (ZnO–LC)–
H2TPP(NH2)2 and (ZnO–LC)–ZnTPP(NH2)2, new emission bands
[23] M. Gouterman, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 6 (1961) 138.
[24] M. Gouterman, G.-E. Khalil, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 53 (1974) 88.
[25] D.J. Quimby, F.R. Longo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97 (1975) 5111.
[26] H. Ishii et al., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 296 (1997) 427.
[27] M. Wang, X. Wang, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 92 (2008) 766.