ORGANIC
LETTERS
2005
Vol. 7, No. 11
2173-2176
Regioselective Lewis Acid-Mediated [1,3]
Rearrangement of Allylvinyl Ethers
Christopher G. Nasveschuk and Tomislav Rovis*
Department of Chemistry, Colorado State UniVersity, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523
Received March 9, 2005
ABSTRACT
Aluminum and copper Lewis acids were implemented to effect a regioselective [1,3] rearrangement of allylvinyl ethers in moderate to good
yields. The use of trisubstituted alkenes leads to depressed levels of Claisen products.
The formation of sterically congested carbon-carbon bonds
with control of stereochemistry still represents a formidable
challenge in organic synthesis. One tool that has met some
of these challenges is the Claisen rearrangement, a [3,3]
rearrangement of allylvinyl ethers.1 This thermal sigmatropic
rearrangement has been shown to relay stereochemical
information from the cleaving C-O bond to the forming
C-C bond via a concerted transition state.2 More recently,
the use of Lewis acids has provided rate acceleration for the
Claisen rearrangement.1 However, under the Lewis acid
manifold, ionic intermediates have been proposed, which
diverges from the generally accepted concerted mechanism.3
If true ionic intermediates do exist, then other regioisomeric
products should be observed. Yamamoto and co-workers
reported that pentadienyl vinyl ethers undergo rearrangement
to produce a mixture of [1,3], [3,3], and [5, 3] regioisomers
in the presence of their bulky aluminum bisphenoxy Lewis
acid.3 Grieco and co-workers, under strongly ionizing condi-
tions, were able to selectively produce [1,3] rearrangement
products from sterically hindered allylvinyl ethers.4 Gansauer
has also illustrated a Cu(OTf)2- and B(C6F5)3-catalyzed
regioselective [1,3] rearrangement of tert-butyl alcohol,
benzyl alcohol, and isophorone-derived vinyl ethers.5,6 In
these cases, the Lewis acid-mediated [1,3] rearrangement of
allylvinyl ethers necessarily proceeds through an allyl cation
and metallo-enolate ion pair. As part of our efforts aimed at
developing stereoselective [1,3] rearrangements,7,8 we initi-
ated a study to harness this reactivity, elucidate the factors
that govern regioselectivity, and explore the scope of the
[1,3] rearrangement of allylvinyl ethers (Scheme 1). Herein,
we disclose our results.
Scheme 1. [3,3] vs [1,3] Rearrangement
Experimentation began with a brief Lewis acid screen
using cinnamyl vinyl ether 1. Cu(II), Sn(IV), and Ti(IV)
(5) (a) Gansauer, A.; Fielenbach, D.; Stock, C. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2002,
344, 845-848. (b) Gansauer, A.; Fielenbach, D.; Stock, C.; Geich-Gimbel,
D. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 1017-1030.
(6) Other examples of [1,3] rearrangements include: (a) Shi, G.; Cai,
W. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 6289-6295. (b) Sperling, D.; Reissig, H.-U.;
Fabian, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 1107-1114. (c) Shiina, I.; Nagasue,
H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5837-5840. (d) Novikov, A. V.; Kennedy,
A. R.; Rainier, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 993-996. (e) Suzuki, T.;
Inui, M.; Hosokawa, S.; Kobayashi, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3713-
3716. (f) Cai, Y.; Roberts, B. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 4645-4648.
(7) Zhang, Y.; Reynolds, N. T.; Manju, K.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 9720-9721.
(1) (a) Lutz, R. P. Chem. ReV. 1984, 84, 223-247. (b) Wipf, P. In
ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford,
1991; Vol. 5, pp 827-873. (c) Martin Castro, A. M. Chem. ReV. 2004,
104, 2939-3002.
(2) For a mechanistic discussion, see: Gajewski, J. J. Acc. Chem. Res.
1997, 30, 219-225.
(3) Nonoshita, K.; Banno, H.; Maruoka, K.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 316-322.
(4) Grieco, P. A.; Clark, J. D.; Jagoe, C. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 5488-5489.
(8) Nasveschuk, C. G.; Rovis, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. http://
www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/110473806/PDFSTART.
10.1021/ol0505151 CCC: $30.25
© 2005 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 05/03/2005